1 / 11

AWRP In-Flight Icing Status

AWRP In-Flight Icing Status. Marcia K. Politovich , NCAR AWRP In-Flight Icing PDT Lead 2 December 2010. In-Flight Icing Product Development Team. Sponsored by FAA’s Aviation Weather Research Program Agenda Algorithm development Severity NWP model improvements Outyear Plans Alaska

wray
Télécharger la présentation

AWRP In-Flight Icing Status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AWRP In-Flight Icing Status Marcia K. Politovich, NCAR AWRP In-Flight Icing PDT Lead 2 December 2010

  2. In-Flight Icing Product Development Team • Sponsored by FAA’s Aviation Weather Research Program • Agenda • Algorithm development • Severity • NWP model improvements • Outyear Plans • Alaska • MRMS • NextGen

  3. Current/Forecast Icing Product

  4. Algorithm Status • CIP-Severity is operational • FIP-Severity is experimental: will be operational 18 Jan’11 • CIP/FIP-RR debut in July – only upgrades will be bug fixes and minor logic changes • Initial CIP/FIP-IOC (V1.0) by end of FY11 • Developmental work on CIP/FIP-HRRR may begin in FY10

  5. Algorithm Development for NextGen Initial Operating Capability, Segment 1, etc. • CIP/FIP-IOC • Major code rewrite (by Mar’11) • Waaaaay overdue • Streamline! Must do for the HRRR….. • Data-driven: provides basis for higher update rates • Science improvements • Better use of model microphysics • Incorporate ASAP (NASA LaRC satellite) products • Other fuzzy logic improvements

  6. CIP/FIP-IOC

  7. Severity • We’re meteorologists, not aerodynamicists • Aero community’s job is to develop accretion and performance models to simulate flight degradation in icing conditions • Our job is to produce temperature, liquid water content, drop size fields in CIP and FIP • Where NWP guidance produces these fields, use them • Where CIP/FIP says icing and NWP models say no, use other means • First attempts during FY11 • Initial! Preliminary! Not for human consumption!!! • Will work with FAA to coordinate activities with aero folks

  8. Supplied by CIP/FIP Supplied by NWP, obs Supplied by DSS

  9. NWP Model Development • Long-term goal is accurate forecasts of liquid water content and drop size • “fill the field” • begin with drop size metric such as median volume diameter – eventually predict full drop size distribution! • Initial work in FY11 to produce improved microphysics output fields • Evaluate which new input data sets will have most value

  10. Outyear Plans: R&D • Model microphysics for HRRR, develop drop size output • Determine how MRMS/dual-pol can help • Analyze and incorporate regional differences in icing physics • Requirements for Alaska products must be clarified – we have versions of CIP/FIP-AK under development

  11. Outyear Plans: NextGen • CIP/FIP-IOC meet the JPDO Environmental Impacts (EI) definitions for IOC products (hourly updates, 13-km/1000-ft resolution) • FY10 and FY11 tasking moves us toward FOC requirements – particularly, increased temporal and spatial resolution • R&D to incorporate MRMS • Model microphysics progress • Begin CIP/FIP-HRRR • Improved satellite analyses • Severity

More Related