1 / 27

Rapid thermalization and thermal radiation: From CGC to QGP

Rapid thermalization and thermal radiation: From CGC to QGP. Kirill Tuchin in collaboration with Dima Kharzeev and Genya Levin. 2006 RHIC & AGS Annual Users’ Meeting. The main puzzle at RHIC. Hydrodynamic models are successful if thermalization time is Δt≈0.5 fm Naively, Δt∼1/(nσ)∼fm/α s.

wstanton
Télécharger la présentation

Rapid thermalization and thermal radiation: From CGC to QGP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Rapid thermalization and thermal radiation: From CGC to QGP • Kirill Tuchin • in collaboration with Dima Kharzeev and Genya Levin 2006 RHIC & AGS Annual Users’ Meeting

  2. The main puzzle at RHIC • Hydrodynamic models are successful if thermalization time is Δt≈0.5 fm • Naively, Δt∼1/(nσ)∼fm/αs (Baier, Mueller, Son, Schiff) Why thermalization is so fast?

  3. Possible solutions • Plasma instabilities (Mrowczynski; Arnold, Lenaghan, Moore). • Early isotropization may help explain v2 (Arnold, Lenaghan, Moore; Rebhan, Romatschke, Strickland). • No thermalization in pQCD (Kovchegov). • AdS/CFT ☺

  4. Macroscopic picture

  5. Space-time structure of the HIC t x- x+ • Upon collision heavy ions experience very large deceleration. • Indeed, most of matter is produced in the transverse plane! Aμ z • How large is acceleration? • It depends only on the strength of the nuclear field ⇒ Limiting fragmentation.

  6. Comoving frame t x- x+ • Comoving frame: Aμ z • ρ, η define the Rindler space in which accelerated particle is at rest. • In the Rindler space x- and x+ are event horizons. Therefore, the produced particle can carry information only about conserved quantities. This is realized in the thermal distribution with T=a/(2π) (Unruh,Hawking).

  7. Hagedorn argument • Consider breakdown of a high energy hadron of mass m into a final hadronic state of mass M. Transition probability: • In dual resonance model density of states is • Transition amplitude: • Probability conservation requires that ∑M P(M) = 1.

  8. Limiting temperature • Therefore the string tension cannot accelerate particles beyond which exactly corresponds to the Hagedorn temperature: • One needs stronger fields to get T>TH; e.g. CGC • In this macroscopic quasiclassical picture one can also study phase transitions. (Ohsaku)

  9. Microscopic picture

  10. Particle production at high energies • Structure of the partonic cascade at high energies: A rapidity p,A,γ* time τ

  11. Background field method • Structure of the partonic cascade at high energies: A static field sources “CGC” rapidity p time • Strength of the field is determined by the density of color charges in the transverse plane, i.e. Qs(y)

  12. Field configuration at low x (I) Kharzeev, KT hep-ph/051234; Kharzeev, Levin, KT hep-ph/0602063 • (Chromo) Electric and Magnetic fields of a high energy hadron/nucleus are transverse (plane wave) and stable. • However, this is true only for a non-interacting hadron. Boundary conditions at the interaction point generate the longitudinal fields. • Recall reflection of light in Electrodynamics!

  13. Field configuration at low x (II) • Since Qs(y) increases down the cascade, the parton transverse size decreases. Therefore, • and A(x,t) does not depend on s • Fries, Kapusta and Li argue that non-Abelian interactions can produce both longitudinal chromoelectric and chromomagnetic fields. • implications: see paper by Lappi & McLerran

  14. Supercritical fields • The work done by the external chromo-electric field E accelerating a virtual qq pair apart by a Compton wavelength λc=h/mc is W=gEh/mc. • If W>2mc2 the pair becomes real. • In QED Ecr=1016 V/cm - beyond the current lab frontier. • In QCD g∼1, m∼Qs or Λ, thus Ecr∼(1 GeV)2 : pair production is a common phenomenon.

  15. Vacuum rearrangement (I) • Example: charged scalar field in time dependent electromagnetic background • Eigenstates: where • Note, that ϕin = ϕ(t→-∞) are different from ϕout =ϕ(t→+∞)

  16. Vacuum rearrangement (II) • Second quantization where • Equivalently • Unitarity implies • Therefore, even if

  17. Particle production by black hole • The same problem of quantization in external field • In Schwartzschild metric • Black hole emission rate Hawking, 75 where the surface gravity is

  18. Propagator in external field • Pair production rate = imaginary part of the propagator • WKB approximation is quite useful for calculating tunneling probabilities. • see T. Lappi’s numerical solution of Dirac equation in external field.

  19. WKB approximation • In the pair production process electron’s energy changes from ε- to ε+ where • Pair production rate Γ≈e-2ImS. Imaginary part of action ImS can be found by integrating phase over states with imaginary momentum: where the turning points of the linear potential are

  20. Canonical approach • Gauge boson propagator in SU(2) can be found from equation of motion • In the quasiclassical approximation we seek solution in form W=exp(-iS-ip⋅x) such that S’’<<(S’)2 • Introduce canonical momenta Pμ=-∂μS+gAμ. Then S can be found along the classical particle trajectories.

  21. Action as a function of coordinates • Trajectory of a particle moving with constant acceleration coincides with the that of particle in a constant field E • Quasiclassical trajectory • Action • Introduce new variables • Imaginary part of action

  22. Schwinger vs Unruh • ImS corresponds to instable, classically forbidden motion. Vacuum decay probability is Γ=exp(-2ImS). • In the constant field • How to reconcile this with Unruh thermal emission? • In Schwiner formula we average over produced pairs while in Unruh one over the excited states of the classical detector. The relative occupation number of two excited states is

  23. Adiabaticity parameter • The adiabaticity parameter measures how rapidly the external field change • At early proper time τ<<1/Qs it follows from the parton model that γ<<1 since • Then the spectrum is: as it should be in E=const

  24. Time evolution of pair production • At later time τ∼1/Qs the parton cascade decays and γ∼1 • The field E∝e-ωτ due to the screening of the original field by the field of produced pairs. • Momentum conservation (momentum lost by the fields equals momentum gain by produced particles) implies

  25. Statistical interpretation • Consider the relative probability of single pair production • The probability that no pairs is produced w0 satisfies • Total probability that vacuum is unchanged is

  26. Statistical interpretation • Narozhny and Nikishov demonstrated in 1970 that the imaginary part of the effective action for multi-pair production has the same form as the thermodynamic potential: • We can follow the produced system till times τ∼1/T. • However, we cannot follow it all the way to the equilibrium until we solve the back-reaction problem. see Cooper, Eisenberg, Kluger, Mottola, Svetitsky, hep-ph/9212206

  27. Summary • We have started to reexamine the role of the vacuum instability in high energy QCD. • Due to existence of a hard scale Qs we hope to be able to analytically address many interesting problems. • Already now we can see that these new ideas can considerably modify our physical picture of particle production in high energy.

More Related