1 / 56

Why Record Retention/Destruction is Important ?

Why Record Retention/Destruction is Important ?. Bar Association ethical obligations Maintain confidentiality and attorney-client privilege Record advice given to clients Surrender the client’s property upon termination Keep records for sometime after termination

wynn
Télécharger la présentation

Why Record Retention/Destruction is Important ?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Why Record Retention/Destructionis Important? • Bar Association ethical obligations • Maintain confidentiality and attorney-client privilege • Record advice given to clients • Surrender the client’s property upon termination • Keep records for sometime after termination • Obtain client consent before destroying records • Responding to government requests for information

  2. IRS Treasury RegulationSection 1.6011-4(g) • Taxpayers must retain a copy of all documents and other records related to the transaction that are material to an understanding of the tax treatment or tax structure of the transaction • Reportable transactions only

  3. The Government May Obtain Your Attorney-Client Privileged Materials • Thompson memorandum requires waiver of the attorney-client privilege • Crime fraud exception requires attorney-client materials to be produced • Administrative summons • Federal grand jury subpoena (forthwith)

  4. Will the Corporation be Prosecuted? • Thompson Memorandum • Corporations are “legal persons,” capable of suing and being sued, and capable of committing crimes. Under the doctrine of respondeatsuperior, a corporation may be held criminally liable for the illegal acts of its directors, officers, employees, and agents. To hold a corporation liable for these actions, the government must establish that the corporate agent’s actions (i) were within the scope of his duties and (ii) were intended, at least in part, to benefit the corporation.

  5. Factors to Determine if a Corporation will be Prosecuted • the nature and seriousness of the offense, including the risk of harm to the public, and applicable policies and priorities, if any, governing the prosecution of corporations for particular categories of crime; • the pervasiveness of wrongdoing within the corporation, including the complicity in, or condonation of, the wrongdoing by corporate management;

  6. Factors to Determineif a Corporation will be Prosecuted • the corporation’s timely and voluntary disclosure of wrongdoing and its willingness to cooperate in the investigation of its agents, including, if necessary, the waiver of corporate attorney-client and work product protection; • the corporation’s history of similar conduct, including prior criminal, civil, and regulatory enforcement actions against it;

  7. Additional Benefits of A Record Retention Policy • Backup to the client’s set of files • Protect the firm from liability • Reduce storage costs or charge clients • Reduce cost of responding to government subpoena/summons

  8. Preliminary Questions • Consideration must be given to: • What the client’s foreseeable need for any of the documents in the file may be • Which specific documents the client has retained • What the client has actually kept or can actually find • What documents does the firm need to keep for loss prevention and ethical compliance • What are statute of limitations periods for relevant potential claims • Cost of storing closed/inactive files

  9. Elements of a Record Retention Program • A written policy • Retention schedules • Implementation procedures • Follow-up and monitoring compliance procedures

  10. Scope of a Record Retention Program • Client and/or administrative records. • Physical and/or electronic records • Retroactive or going forward

  11. Steps In Implementing ARecord Retention Policy • Form a record retention committee • Review the current document management system • Develop a document collection policy • Determine document retention needs • Develop a document retention policy • Publish a records retention manual • Develop an employee training program • Review and update the record retention policy

  12. The Record Retention Committee • Top management • Finance • Records Manager • Articulate the firm’s retention policy and implementation procedures • Define legal obligations of firm • Designate records coordinator for each practice group or department • Collect policies of each department and prepare a manual • Develop the training program • Review performance on an annual basis and report to management

  13. Review Current Record Management System • What stays in the file when the file is closed? • Attorney handwritten notes and internal memoranda. • At conclusion of matter, which documents are returned to the client? • Identify number of boxes in storage and their contents. • Gather indexes prepared by individual lawyers for their files in storage. • Review procedures used for maintaining current files and closed matters. • Are drafts retained in the file? • Are any documents destroyed before a files is sent to storage? • Does your firm have a written document policy?

  14. Record Collection Policy • Develop a document collection policy by determining what belongs in the file, and what does not. For example, drafts or closing documents • Design forms and document a step-by-step process for routine attorney review of a file at the close of a matter • Assign accountability and responsibility for each step in the process

  15. Determine Record Retention Needs • What types of documents do clients need to defend claims? • Are there statutes of limitations that may affect a client’s right to pursue or defend a claim? • Are original or official records maintained in the file or returned to the client? • Are client provided documents kept in files or returned to the client? • When are matters considered inactive?

  16. Determine Record Retention Needs • When are matters considered closed? • When should specific documents be returned to clients? For example, at the close of a matter or at the end of a defined storage period? • Which documents should be returned? • Should the firm retain copies of any returned documents? • How should drafts be handled?

  17. Elements Of ARecord Retention Policy • Define the firm’s ethical obligations regarding retention of client records. • Explain how the records are managed and stored. • Explain retention periods. • Discuss when documents are eligible for destruction. • Explain how document destruction occurs.

  18. Key Components Of ARecord Retention Policy • In the engagement letter create a record retention/destruction agreement between the firm and the client. • Describe specifically what must be removed from the file when it is closed. • Determine what part of the file belongs to the client and the law firm. • Outline the extent of lawyer/CPA judgment and/or client participation in the decision to destroy or return to the client. • The classification system should establish categories of documents such as correspondence, legal research, pleadings etc.

  19. Three Phases To ARecord Retention Policy • Active phase - on-going use and maintenance of documents in the file. • Inactive phase – documents are stored offsite and rarely examined. • Final disposition – documents are destroyed, returned to the client, or permanently retained.

  20. Client File Retention Schedule Retention Area of LawPeriodComment Tax MC + 10Y Retain Opinion Letters 15Y

  21. Administrative Records Retention Schedule RecordDescriptionOfficeOff-SiteComment 1 Billing Ltr 2Y 5Y

  22. Records Retention Policy forClient Files • General Statements • Statement of Purpose • Scope • Statement of Responsibility • Terms and Definitions • Confidentiality • Exceptions

  23. Records Retention Policy forClient Files • General Records Management • Definition of “Record” • The Records Management System • Records Creation • Records Maintenance • Records Storage

  24. Records Retention Policy forClient Files • Specific Records Retention Procedures • Basis for client records retention schedules • Retention schedules • Ownership issues • Notice requirements • Preparing client files for storage • Returning client-owned materials • Storage costs • Final disposition • Suspension of final disposition • Release of client records

  25. Records Retention Policy forClient Files • Lawyers Beginning/Terminating • Incoming Lawyers • Departing Lawyers • Firm Dissolution

  26. What If The Records Are Electronic? • Identify the body of digital information that needs a separate retention period, decide how long to retain the records, and then express the retention and disposition periods in a manner that makes implementing them practical. • Collect appropriate data that describe existing computer applications. • Conduct interviews with information technology group and end-users. • Solicit data from information technology group by questionnaire • Determine retention periods

  27. What If The Records Are Electronic? • Construct “total life cycle” retention periods • Determine whether data migration and deletion occur automatically • Determine the need for consistent retention periods where redundant data exist on multiple media • Be highly selective about appraising electronic records as “permanent”

  28. Reconciling Record Retention Policies With Federal Obstruction of Justice Statutes • Record retention policies destroy documents • Obstruction of justice laws are designed to protect documents from being destroyed

  29. Main Reason for Improper Destruction • Poorly designed record retention programs • Record retention program not administered properly • Record retention program not audited properly

  30. When Should Record DestructionBe Suspended? • The record retention policy must contain specific directions about when and to what degree the record retention program should be suspended • Compliance with the record retention policy should be documented • Regular auditing of the record retention policy will assure that records are actually being destroyed/retained pursuant to the policy

  31. Process for Destroying Records A record retention policy should provide specific guidance on the process for destroying records. • Including the time of file reviews • A description of circumstances in which records can be discarded or shredded • Identification of individuals who have authority and responsibility for destroying records

  32. Procedures for Destroying Records • Notice of intent to destroy • Monitor transfer records • Monitor destruction of records

  33. Obstructing the Due Administration of Justice Under 18 U.S.C. § 1503 - Elements • A judicial proceeding must be pending • The defendant must know that the judicial proceeding is pending • Defendant must act “corruptly” with the specific intent to impede the due administration of justice

  34. Anticipatory obstruction • If you know that a subpoena will be coming, you may violate the obstruction of justice statute

  35. Arthur Andersen timeline • October 12, 2001: Temple e-mail says remind Enron engagement team of the retention policy • October 16, 2001: Enron press release states that losses are massive • October 19, 2001: Enron informs AA of SEC inquiry into “SPE” • October 23, 2001: AA meets to coordinate destruction of documents • October 31, 2001: SEC sends AA a subpoena • November 8, 2001: SEC serves AA with subpoena • November 9, 2001: AA stops destroying documents

  36. Elements of 18 U.S.C. § 1512 (b): (Victim and Witness Protection Act) • There is no need to show that a judicial proceeding is pending • Corruptly persuading another person to destroy or conceal the documents from use in an official proceeding • The government had to prove two elements beyond a reasonable doubt to convict Arthur Andersen • AA corruptly persuaded another person; and • AA intended to cause another person to withhold a document from an official proceeding, or destroy or conceal an object with the intent to impairthe object’s availability for use in an official proceeding.

  37. AA Indictment • On October and November 2001 . . . Partners corruptly persuaded persons to destroy documents to impair the documents integrity and availability for use in an official proceeding.

  38. AA Jury Instruction • . . . .[I]f an agent/partner acted within the scope of employment (even if the agent’s act was illegal or contrary to the firm’s policies), the partnership is still responsible for the agent’s act.

  39. Solution for avoiding Arthur Andersen problems • The record retention program must be routinely followed and not just when there is a problem. • Non-destruct memoranda should be sent to employees if an investigation is anticipated • Create a record retention policy at a neutral time • Managing and auditing the record retention policy to insure compliance must be done regularly (e.g. issue periodic reminders) • The Arthur Andersen jury foreman stated that “the shredding showed that AA had not trained its people very well”.

  40. 18 U.S.C. Section 15.19 Sarbanes-Oxley • Whoever knowingly destroys or conceals a document with intent to impede an investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States may be imprisoned up to 20 years.

  41. Government Requests Information • Produce documents and data • Select a records custodian • Develop a process for producing documents • Produce the responsive documents • Preserve and assert attorney-client/work product privileges • Avoid improper destruction

  42. Benefits of a Legal Freeze • Preservation of key facts necessary to advise the company • Prevent obstruction of justice allegations

  43. Implementing a Legal Freeze • Send a “non-destruct” memorandum • Formal communication to all employees that have relevant documents

  44. Contents Of A “Non-Destruct” Memorandum • Clearly identify the types of documents to be preserved • Memorandum comes from high-level officials • Identify all recorded information, such as electronic data • Identify a person who employees can contact with questions

  45. Select A Records Custodian To Gather Requested Records • Send memorandum to records custodian documenting her/his tasks • Non-Lawyer • No knowledge of facts

  46. Send Memorandum ToThe Records Custodian • Identify all departments, offices and employees with potentially responsive documents • Identify former employees who may possess responsive documents • Consult with information technology personnel to develop a search protocol for responsive computer data • Segregate all documents produced so that they can be identified by source

  47. Send Memorandum To The Records Custodian (continued) • Keep all documents in a locked room with limited access • Bates-stamp all documents with control numbers • Copy and produce the copies if possible

  48. Records Custodian Sends Memorandum To Employees • Paraphrase the specific language of the subpoena so that the employees can identify relevant records • Instruct employees to thoroughly search all files and computer records within their possession, custody or control • Instruct employees to identify documents that may contain attorney-client privileged information • Identify a specific date for the employees to produce the documents

  49. Send Questionnaires To Employees • Ask each employee to identify the types and categories of responsive documents in their possession or that they are aware of • Employees identify responsive documents that are off site • Use questionnaire to develop a strategy

  50. Benefits Of Questionnaires • They identify persons who have knowledge of particular transactions • They can reduce costs by eliminating persons who do not have relevant information

More Related