10 likes | 113 Vues
This updated framework refines leadership performance assessment for military personnel, emphasizing clear responsibility divisions between Rater-Performance and Senior Rater-Potential roles. It includes differentiated evaluation reports based on grade plates, Rater Profiles, and future assignment recommendations. The system redefines senior rater box labels, manages large rater populations through pooling, approves rating schemes, and limits Intermediate Rater usage to specific roles. Clear directives on Rater-Senior Rater relationships and mandatory form realignment for WO1-COL. This system ensures accurate leadership attribute evaluation and competency assessment in military settings.
E N D
OER Changes • Assess performance based on leadership attributes and competencies • Clear delineation of responsibilities: Rater-Performance; Senior Rater-Potential • Three separate evaluation reports based on grade plate: • Company Grade (2LT-CPT & WO1-CW2) • Field Grade (MAJ-LTC & CW3-CW5) • Strategic Leaders (COL-BG) (Currently under review) • Rater Profile for the Company and Field Grade Plate • Future Operational and Broadening Assignment Recommendations • Redefine Senior Rater box label techniques (49% Top Box remains) • Manage large senior rater populations (pooling) – adhere to normal line of supervision • Rating Schemes approved one level up • Limit use of Intermediate Raters to Specialty Branches and Dual Supervisory Roles • Rater “will be the immediate supervisor of the rated officer” • Senior Rater “will be the immediate supervisor of the rater” • Support Form realigned and mandatory for WO1-COL