1 / 19

Structuring An Argument

Structuring An Argument. Argument Seeks to discover a truth Seeks conviction Seeks to get audience to agree with us More about finding the best strategy to present ideas. Persuasion Seeks to know a truth Seeks to change opinion using reason and other rhetorical strategies

wyoming-meyer
Télécharger la présentation

Structuring An Argument

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Structuring An Argument

  2. Argument Seeks to discover a truth Seeks conviction Seeks to get audience to agree with us More about finding the best strategy to present ideas Persuasion Seeks to know a truth Seeks to change opinion using reason and other rhetorical strategies Propaganda and advertising: abandons all reason, truth, fairness Is it Argument or is it Persuasion?

  3. Strategies Inductive Reasoning Deductive Reasoning Toulmin Argument

  4. Inductive Reasoning (formal) • Inductive reasoning: makes a generalization, writer offers enough evidence until he can draw a logical conclusion from the evidence. Not always a smoking gun, so must close the gap between the evidence presented and the conclusion • Present evidence that will lead to a conclusion: Court of law; criminal investigation

  5. Take a moment: • Examine your thesis • Spanking as a form of discipline does not help a child change behavior. • Try to write your thesis in an inductive manner: a sentence that evidence must prove.

  6. Deductive Reasoning (formal) • Deductive reasoning: predicated on moral or principle commonly held by both the writer and his audience: something that you both agree on: All children disserve to grow up loved • Establishes common ground with reader

  7. Take a Moment: • Examine your thesis • What value or principle will you and your audience share? • Children shouldn’t be abused • Try to write a deductive thesis

  8. Toulmin? • British philosopher • Wanted to look for a method that actually represents the way people make the most effective and reasonable argument. • Allows writer to use qualifiers • Not air tight in reasoning as inductive reasoning and deductive

  9. Faults with Toulmin • Not air tight • Not formal • Not as structured But Develops good critical thinking skills Allows to use qualifiers: often, presumably, unless, almost, some, generally

  10. Toulimin’s model had 3 elements: • Claim:equivalent of the conclusion or whatever the writer wants to prove: your thesis • Data: evidence, reasoning, logic that writer uses to support the claim--your research • Warrant: a general statement that establishes a trustworthy relationship between the data and claim

  11. New Language • Claim: statement or assertion writer hopes to prove • Controversial and debatable statement • Argument depends on conditions set by others--your audience

  12. Examples of simple, underdeveloped claims • The electoral college has outlived its usefulness • It’s time to lower the drinking age. • Vegetarianism is the best choice of diet

  13. A claim cannot stand alone: Where to begin? • Needs data and reasons • So draw up a list of reasons to support the claim • And find evidence (research) that support your reasons • You will discover more claims in need of support: the argument begins to take shape

  14. How to come up with reasons • Search your personal experience • Anecdotes (from personal life or friends) • Facts: research • Authorities: research

  15. Using the Enthymeme: adding “because” (the reason) • Combine your claim with your reason: • The Electoral College has outlived its usefulness because it gives undue power to small and mid-sized states in presidential elections

  16. Always be aware of your audience • While you are structuring your argument you are thinking about being reasonable and logical, your reader will be reading your essay with a critical eye, questioning your logic

  17. Next step: The Warrant Logical and persuasive connection between claim and its reasons and the data that supports the claim This is the warrant: the connection between the claim, reasons, and data Warrant answers the question How do I get from the claim to the data You can precede in an argument with a sound warrant

  18. The Claim • Must be worth arguing • Must be debatable • Rely on using logic or evidence • Difficult to sometimes to get a strong claim • A good claim answers “So what’s your point?” • Does your working thesis fit these qualities?

  19. Take a Moment • Examine your thesis • What is your claim: Spanking is not an effective method of discipline for children • Data: evidence that you will gather to prove the claim • Warrant: the conclusion that you draw from the evidence you present: Spanking demoralizes children, often leads to abuse, and does not provide strategies for behavior modification

More Related