1 / 17

Entanglement Propagation in Photon Pairs created by SPDC

Entanglement Propagation in Photon Pairs created by SPDC. Malcolm O’Sullivan-Hale , Kam Wai Chan, and Robert W. Boyd Institute of Optics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY. Presented at OSA Annual Meeting, October 10 th , 2006. Spontaneous Parametric Down-Conversion. k. k. k. 2. 2.

xanthe
Télécharger la présentation

Entanglement Propagation in Photon Pairs created by SPDC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Entanglement Propagation in Photon Pairs created by SPDC Malcolm O’Sullivan-Hale,Kam Wai Chan, and Robert W. Boyd Institute of Optics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY Presented at OSA Annual Meeting, October 10th, 2006

  2. Spontaneous Parametric Down-Conversion k k k 2 2 2 2 ' ' ! ! ! = = i i s s p p Type-II We will restrict ourselves to degenerate and nearly collinear SPDC taking, c ks ki kp

  3. Motivation • Entangled position and momentum spaces in SPDC involve high dimensional Hilbert spaces. • Questions: • Effects of free-space propagation on the spatial correlations between photons? • Implications about the entanglement present in the system?

  4. Theory of SPDC 2 ½ · µ ¶ ¸ ¾ L 1 R 2 w ¾ 0 2 0 ( ) j j à i ¡ + ¡ + q q q q / e x p i i ¡ s s ¾ 2 2 ; [ = ) ] [ ( = ) ] 2 2 = k 0 2 2 1 2 1 + + w ¾ ¾ w 0 0 k 0 0 0 p n 0 p p · ¸ L L i + ´ 2 j j £ ¡ ¡ q q e x p i s k 4 0 p Given a Gaussian pump field (waist w0, curvature R), the two-photon wave function can be written in momentum-space as, where qs,i are transverse wave vectors, L is the crystal length, h is a fitting parameter, and

  5. qi Dqicond Entanglement Dqi qs ( ) ( ) ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ i + < q q m n q q q R i i s s ; ´ d q ¢ c o n ( ) ( ) q ¢ ¢ ¢ i ¡ < x x m n x x i i s s ; Entanglement criterion [1]: D(qs+ qi) Dqi Dqs To quantify amount of entanglement, we use the Schmidt Number: More conveniently, we can use the Fedorov Ratio [2,3]: D(xs- xi) Dxi Dxs [1] D’Angelo et al, PRL. 92, 233601 (2004). [2] Fedorov et al., PRA 69, 052117 (2004). [3] Chan and Eberly, quant-ph/0404093.

  6. Propagation of Correlations Intermediate-field ? Far-field Near-field

  7. Propagation of Correlations (continued…) qi Dqcond Dq qs xi Dxcond Dx xs How does the Fedorov Ratio change on propagation? z 1 z What is going on here?

  8. Experimental Set-up ¸ 3 6 3 8 n m = 2 : j ( ) j à x x i 8 5 0 s ; w ¹ m = 0 x x i s BBO (2 mm) f=100 mm 1:1 imaging PBS Measure coincidence events as a function of xi and xs to map out wave function at various longitudinal positions.

  9. Near-field Correlations ( ( ) ) x x ¹ ¹ m m i s • Slits/knife edge placed in the imaged plane of the crystal. • Strongly correlated photon positions. • Rx = 9.61 • Theory predicts 31.6 Normalized Coincidence Rates

  10. Far-field Correlations ( ( ) ) x x ¹ ¹ m m i s • Slits/knife edge placed in the focal plane of the lens. • Strongly anti-correlated photon positions. • Rx = 28.52 • Theory predicts 76.3 Normalized Coincidence Rates

  11. The Intermediate Zone? ( ( ) ) x x ¹ ¹ m m i s • Slits moved behind image plane (12 cm behind image plane or 14.5 cm after crystal). • Little residual spatial correlations. • Rx = 1.19 • Theory predicts 1.92 Normalized Coincidence Rates

  12. Migration of Entanglement to Phase 2 j ( ) ( ) j p ( ) Ã Ã Á i ( ) + ( ¡ ) ( ) Ã f x x x x x x i i i s ; x x x g x e = s s i i 2 ; ; j ( ) j ( ) ( ) Ã f s s ; x x x g x = i i s s ; • At a particular propagation distance z0the amplitude-squared wave function will become separable, although the wave function itself is entangled, i.e. • The entanglement has migrated to phase. We need interferometric methods to get information about the entanglement.

  13. Experiment to Detect Phase Entanglement 2 j ( ) ( ) j à à + ¡ x x x x i i s s ; ; Same as before, but with a rotational shearing interferometer in idler arm. Superimposes image with rotated version of itself

  14. Theoretical Predictions b a a Fourth-order fringes yield information about entanglement independent of propagation distance.

  15. Conclusions • We have experimentally investigated the propagation of spatial correlations in SPDC. • The apparent disappearance of entanglement can be explained by the migration of entanglement from intensity to the phase of the wave function. • Rotational shearing interferometers should enable us to recover the entanglement information in the intermediate zones.

  16. Acknowledgements Collaborators: J.H. Eberly J.P. Torres & Supported by - the US Army Research Office through a MURIgrant

  17. THANK YOU! www.optics.rochester.edu/workgroups/boyd/nonlinear.html

More Related