1 / 8

11.5 Implicit Partitioning/Packing Problems

11.5 Implicit Partitioning/Packing Problems. Given M = {1, … , m}, K implicitly described sets of feasible subsets of M. Find a maximum value packing or partition of M consisting of certain of these subsets.

xanthus-fox
Télécharger la présentation

11.5 Implicit Partitioning/Packing Problems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 11.5 Implicit Partitioning/Packing Problems • Given M = {1, … , m}, K implicitly described sets of feasible subsets of M. Find a maximum value packing or partition of M consisting of certain of these subsets. • In terms of original IP, we set xk = (yk, wk) with yk{0, 1}m being the incidence vector of subset k of M. wk are auxiliary variables needed to define whether the subset with incidence vector yk is feasible, and to define the possibly nonlinear objective function value of the corresponding subset. ck = (ek, fk), Ak = ( I, 0), b = 1. z = max { k=1K (ekyk + fkwk ): k=1Kyk1, (yk, wk)  Xkfor k = 1, … , K}. Now let (yk,t, wk,t) corresponds to the tth feasible solution in the set Xk , and k, t is the corresponding variable.

  2. z = max { k=1K (ekyk + fkwk ): k=1Kyk1, (yk, wk)  Xkfor k = 1, … , K}. • Integer Programming Master z = max k=1K t=1Tk ( ekyk, t + fkwk, t ) k, t k=1K t: y(i, k, t) =1 k, t=1 for i M t=1Tkk, t 1 for k = 1, … ,K k, t  {0, 1} for t = 1, … , Tk and k = 1, … , K

  3. Ex) Multi-Item Lot-Sizing Given demands dtk for items k = 1, … , K over a time horizon t = 1, … , T. All items must be produced on a single machine; the machine can produce only one item in each period and has a capacity Ctk if item k is produced in period t. • min k=1K t=1T ( ptkxtk + htkstk + ftkytk) k=1Kytk 1 for t = 1, … , n (xk, sk, yk)  Xk for k = 1, … ,K where Xk = { (xk, sk, yk)  R+nR+n Bn : st-1k + xtk = dtk + stk, xtkCtkytk for t = 1, … , T}.

  4. Ex) Clustering (min cut clustering) Given G = (V, E), edge costs ce for e  E, node weights di for i  V, and a cluster capacity C, want to split the node set V into K (possibly empty) clusters such that the sum of the node weights in each cluster does not exceed C and the sum of the weights of the edges between clusters is minimized (maximize the sum of weights of edges within clusters). • max k=1K eEcewek k=1Kyik 1 for i V (wk, yk)  Xk for k = 1, … ,K where Xk = { (wk, yk)  BmBn : wekyik , wekyjk , wekyik + yjk – 1, for e = (i, j)  E, iVdiyik C } with yik = 1 if node i is in cluster k and wek = 1 if edge e has both endpoints in cluster k.

  5. Ex) Capacitated Vehicle Routing Given G = (V, E), a depot node 0, edge costs ce for each e  E, K identical vehicles of capacity C, and client orders di for i  V\{0}. Want to find a set of subtours (cycles) for each vehicle such that (i) each subtour contains the depot, (ii) together the subtours contain all the nodes, (iii) the subtours are disjoint on the node set V\{0}, and (iv) the total demand on each subtour (the total amount delivered by each vehicle) does not exceed C. • Ex) Generalized Assignment Problem

  6. 11.6 Partitioning with Identical Subsets • How to avoid symmetry in solutions when subsets are interchangeable (independent of k) (ex: clustering, vehicle routing) • As Xk = X, (ek, fk) = (e, f) and Tk = T for all k. Set t = k=1K k, t (IPM) max t=1T ( eyt + fwt ) t t: y(i, t) = 1 t = 1 for i M t=1Tt K for i M   BT • Subproblem is  = max { (e - )y + fw -  : (y, w)  X}

  7. Branching rules: What if solution is not integral? (i) If , then form two branches with and respectively. (ii) If  BT, need modifications on the branching rule. Rationale: For every feasible partitioning, any two elements i and j are either in the same subset or in different subsets. • Prop 11.3: (Ryan and Foster(1981)) If  BT, there exist rows i, j  M such that 0 < t : y(i, t) = y(j, t) =1 t < 1

  8. Two branching constraints: (1): t: y(i, t)=1, y(j, t) = 1 t = 1 : rows iand j should be covered by same column. All feasible columns must have yit = yjt= 0 or yit = yjt= 1. Infeasible columns eliminated (or value of corresponding variable  set to 0 ) After branch, generate only the subsets such that i and j are in the same subset. (Add yi = yj to the subproblem) (2): t: y(i, t)=1, y(j, t) = 1 t = 0 : rows iand j should be covered by diff. columns. All feasible columns must have yit= yjt= 0 or yit = 0,yjt= 1 or yit = 1,yjt= 0 Generate only subsets which include at most one of i or j. (Add yi + yj 1 to the subproblem)

More Related