1 / 38

PROPERTY B SLIDES 3-27-19

Explore landmark adverse possession cases and memory aids for understanding the elements and requirements. Includes Jackie Robinson & Branch Rickey tribute.

xavierg
Télécharger la présentation

PROPERTY B SLIDES 3-27-19

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PROPERTY B SLIDES3-27-19 NATIONAL SCRIBBLE DAY

  2. Wednesday Mar 27: Music to Accompany Lutz: Billie Holiday Sings (1952) Next Few DF Sessions: • Today/Friday (Lauren): Lawyering Problem 1H from Lawyering Qs Bank at Bottom of Course Page • Next Wed (Lauren) & Fri (Brendan): Review Problem 4B NCAA CONTEST • Hard Copy Forms on Front Table • Submit to Me Electronically or to Me or Tina in Hard Copy Before ConLaw Tomorrow

  3. PROPERTY B: 3/27 WEDNESday Pop Culture Moment 72 Years Ago in Brooklyn: 1st Night of Passover Why is This Night Different …?

  4. PROPERTY B: 3/27 Pop Culture Moment Why is This Night Different …? A Brief Tribute to Jackie Robinson & Branch Rickey

  5. PROPERTY B: 3/27 Pop Culture Moment Why is This Night Different …? … Back in Brooklyn!!!

  6. CHAPTER 4: ADVERSE POSSESSIONINTRODUCTION Cont’d

  7. Cases: Brief Introduction with Memory AidsLutz (NY 1952) Squatters’ Garden Thrives During the Great Depression Billie Holiday Sings

  8. Cases: Brief Introduction with Memory AidsRay (NY 1996) Creepy Summers in Empty Resort barry manilow, summer of ‘78

  9. Cases: Brief Introduction with Memory AidsE. 13th Street (NY. Supr. 1996) Squatters’ Ensemble Tries to Act Together RENT (Original Cast Album)

  10. Cases: Brief Introduction with Memory AidsBell (Wash. 1989) Houseboat Tied to Land with Woodshed, Sauna & Moving Outhouse The B-52s, COSMiCThiNG featuring “Love Shack”

  11. Secondary Cases: Not Required for Panels I’ll Use Facts or Specific Doctrinal Points as Examples I Won’t Call on You for These Need to Read Eventually; Can Follow Better if Read Howard (Wash App 1970 (S110-13) Marengo Cave (Ind 1937) (in Note at P114-15 on Open & Notorious)

  12. Cases: Brief Introduction with Memory AidsHoward v. Kunto (S110-13) Everyone is One Lot Over from Their Deed

  13. Adverse Possession: OverviewCases: Three Common Fact Patterns Mistaken Owner w Good Faith Belief in Title ~Ray; Howard Boundary Dispute between Neighbors Miami Herald Article; Rev Probs 4J-4L, 4N Outsider “Squatting” Lutz; E. 13th St.; Bell

  14. SEQUOIA: DQs 4.02-4.03 SEQUOIAS

  15. Adverse Possession: Color of Title Origins: “Color of …” Title, Law Writing (Incorrectly) Purporting to Give Title Often Defective Will or Deed Need to Have Good Faith Belief in Document Significance: Makes it Easier for APors to Prove Case Examples in Readings of Rules Doing This

  16. Adverse Possession: Color of TitleSequoia DQ 4.02 Writing (Incorrectly) Purporting to Give Title Significance: Makes it Easier for APors to Prove Case DQ4.02: Why do states have stricter requirements for AP w/o Color of Title?

  17. Adverse Possession: Color of TitleSequoia DQ 4.02 Writing (Incorrectly) Purporting to Give Title Significance: Makes it Easier for APors to Prove Case DQ4.02: Why do states have stricter requirements for AP w/o Color of Title? Reward good faith; reward better title

  18. Adverse Possession: Boundary Disputes v. AP of Complete Parcel AP regarding overlapping borders, not whole lots. Most Common Type of AP Case Shows Up in Some of My Old Problems Significance: Changes Requirements/Elements in Some States We’ll Go Through Some Specifics as We Cover Indiv. Elements

  19. Adverse Possession: Boundary DisputesSequoiaDQ 4.03 AP regarding overlapping borders, not whole lots Significance: Changes Requirements/Elements in Some States DQ4.03: Why Treat Boundary Disputes Differently?

  20. Adverse Possession: Boundary DisputesSequoiaDQ 4.03 AP regarding overlapping borders, not whole lots Significance: Changes Requirements/Elements in Some States DQ4.03: Why Treat Boundary Disputes Differently? 1. Tension re diligent owners v. friendly relations w neighbors. (Cross-Reference Easements by Estoppel in Chapter 5) 2. Maybe different expectations re OO’s diligence (Al-Qaeda & 5-foot strip) 3. Less concern about underutilization of land

  21. ELEMENTS OF ADVERSE POSSESSION Our Sequence • Actual Use • Open & Notorious • Exclusive • Continuous • Adverse/Hostile Primary Panel Responsibilities: ACADIA DQ4.04-4.06 (TodayM0nday) Rev. Prob. 4B (Wed 4/3) Rev. Prob. 4A in DF Wed & Fri Next Week

  22. Adverse Possession Actual Use: Overview 1. Focus: What has APor Done on Land a. Has to be some physical possession/entry to trigger SoL b. In practice need much more to satisfy element (LMN) 2. Many State-specific legal tests/examples in materials a. In real case, check specifics in your state b. On exam: Note & Deal w Possibilities i) Lawyering Q ii) Issue-Spotter or Short Problem

  23. Adverse Possession Actual Use: Overview 1. Focus: What has APor Done on Land 2. Many State-specific legal tests/examples in materials Common: Version of “Use Like Ordinary Owner of Similar Property.” E.g., Ray (similar test for both Actual & Continuous) Lutz Dissent (quoting Ramapo) Common: Cultivation, Enclosure, Improvements (CEI) NY [& Florida] Statutes

  24. Adverse Possession Actual Use: Overview Cultivation, Enclosure, Improvements (CEI) Rough Definitions (can check local law) Cultivation = Growing things; some sense of crops for food or sale Enclosure = Surrounding land in Q w fences/walls Improvements (Technical Legal Term) = Substantial Building or Repairs Not Just “Making Property Better”

  25. Adverse Possession Actual Use: Overview Cultivation, Enclosure, Improvements (CEI) Part of DQ4.05: When statute says CEI, can you have AP if residing or operating biz from pre-existing bldg.? Probably. No FL case re old statute holds otherwise; cases fall back on “ordinary use” if no CEI In practice, CEI = steps sufficient to show “possessing” land when not actually in residence or running business

  26. Adverse Possession Actual Use: Overview Cultivation, Enclosure, Improvements (CEI) CEI = steps sufficient to show “possessing” land when not actually in residence or running business Likely Source: Where land undeveloped, what are beneficial uses that give notice to OO? Build Grow crops Graze animals + Enclosure (Grazing alone may not be sufficient claim of ownership)

  27. Adverse Possession Actual Use: Overview Fit into AP Purposes

  28. Adverse Possession-Actual Use: Overview Easy Qs/Hard Qs Relatively Easy YES Use same as surrounding lots CEI covering entire claimed area Residing or Operating Business using Most of Parcel Relatively Easy NO: Use significantly less than surrounding lots Marginal CEI

  29. Adverse Possession Actual Use: Overview Easy Qs/Hard Qs Hard Qs Not a lot of use but more than surrounding lots (Ray, Bell, Vezey) Some non-trivial CEI but incomplete/imperfect (Lutz) Rev Prob 4A (Mon) addresses some hard Qs Qs on Overview of “Actual Use”?

  30. Review Problem 4B: “Actual Use” Element ACADIA WEDNESDAY April 3 Arguments/Missing Facts? Cultivation, Improvements, Enclosure Enclosure Separately All Three Together Activity Like Owner of Similar Property? Activity Meet Purposes of AP/Actual Use? Only Doing This One Element; Assume Others Met!!

  31. ACADIA: DQ4.04 Acadia Sunrise

  32. Actual Use Element in the CasesDQ4.04: Lutz (NY 1952) Squatters’ Garden Thrives During the Great Depression Billie Holiday Sings

  33. Actual Use: DQ4.04 (Badlands)Lutz: Garden of Great Depression Why no focus on Charley Residing? Maybe b/c area very small Maybe b/c anticipated problem with [no] claim of title (we’ll come back to with both improvements in a couple of slides & with state of mind on Thursday) Even dissent seems to focus more on cultivation So we’ll look mainly at CEI

  34. Actual Use: DQ4.04 (Badlands)Lutz: Garden of Great Depression If Need CEI: Enclosure? Some boundary line around garden; long row of logs & brush Not Discussed by Majority Maybe too low; maybe not complete enough Maybe not claimed by Attys

  35. Actual Use: DQ4.04 (Badlands)Lutz: Garden of Great Depression If Need CEI: Cultivation: “usually cultivated” Evidence Here? Why Rejected by Majority? Why Did Dissent Disagree?

  36. Actual Use: DQ4.04 (Badlands)Lutz: Garden of Great Depression ASIDE: Why should appellate courts defer to the factual findings of a trial court if the appellate judges believe the findings are incorrect? We Discussed in Context of Sorenson.

  37. Actual Use: DQ4.04 (Badlands)Lutz: Garden of Great Depression If Need CEI: Improvements (Substantial Building/Repairs) Some Small Stuff Insufficient Portable chicken coop Cutting of brush and trees Placing various rubbish on premises.

  38. Actual Use: DQ4.04 (Badlands)Lutz: Garden of Great Depression If Need CEI: Improvements (Substantial Building/Repairs) Some Small Stuff Insufficient Built Shack: What’s Wrong with? Garage Partly Over Boundary Line: What’s Wrong With?

More Related