1 / 10

LOCALISM AND NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNING

LOCALISM AND NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNING. FIRST THOUGHTS FROM MICHAEL PARKES FORMER PLANNING WORKER KXRLG, CLAWS AND PAL MARCH 2011. PERSONAL BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT. MEMBER OF KXRLG . PLANNING WORKER 1990 – 2005 PERSONAL VIEWS . KXRLG HAS AS YET NO FORMAL POSITION ON THE BILL

xiu
Télécharger la présentation

LOCALISM AND NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNING

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LOCALISM AND NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNING FIRST THOUGHTS FROM MICHAEL PARKES FORMER PLANNING WORKER KXRLG, CLAWS AND PAL MARCH 2011

  2. PERSONAL BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT • MEMBER OF KXRLG . PLANNING WORKER 1990 – 2005 • PERSONAL VIEWS . • KXRLG HAS AS YET NO FORMAL POSITION ON THE BILL • SUPPORT THE BILL IN PRINCIPLE • MOVE FROM TOP DOWN PATERNALISM TO BOTTOM UP “HELPING PEOPLE TO HELP THEMSELVES” • WELCOME THE INSTITUTIONLISATION OF COMMUNITY PLANNING INTO FORMAL PROCESS AND PRACTICE • NEW DELIVERY AND FUNDING MECHANISMS • EVENTUALLY MERGE / SIMPLIFY LDF INTO SCS / LAA ?

  3. COMMUNITY PLANNING NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNING • SHOULD BE POSSIBLE IN ESTABLISHED NEIGHBOURHOODS • PREVIOUS RELATIVE SUCCESS ON FAR MORE CONTROVERSIAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT SITES eg :- • KINGS CROSS RAILWAY LANDS INTERIM AND PERMANENT • ISLEDON ROAD (FPAG) (completely built) • SPITALFIELDS (BANGLADESHI CMTY DEV GROUP) • STONEBRIDGE ESTATE (TENANTS ADVANCEMENT C’EE) • ELEPHANT AND CASTLE 2001 / 2 (E & C CMTY DEV GRP) • WHITECHAPEL CROSSRAIL COMMUNITY LIAISON PANEL

  4. COMMUNITY LED NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNING PUBLIC / CVS / PRIVATE SECTOR PARTNERSHIP AND RESOURCES WILL BE KEY CREDIBILITY AND CAPACITY ON ALL SIDES

  5. 1 : COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION : WHY DO IT ? Community participation can lead to better planning and delivery by :- • Building in local knowledge, needs and circumstances • Developing local partnerships with important public and private sector interests • Building local “ownership” or a tangible stake in the product • Creating a better informed and empowered local community • Developing local capacity to manage, access funding and even deliver some of the local services and development eg Community Gardens, Community Nurseries

  6. 2 : COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION : WHY DO IT ? As a result the Plan is :- • Politically and practically deliverable • More responsive to demand • Easier to manage and maintain • More flexible in its response to changing circumstances • More economically efficient with potential for jobs and training for local people • More sustainable

  7. FOREWARNED IS FORARMED • Inner City communities are not in my experience incapable of thinking strategically and are not necessarily “nimby” egKXRLG permanent development proposals 1990, • Regeneration is about People as well as Place. Disadvantaged communities would generally prefer to stay and get a “slice of the action” rather than be “squeezed out” through the unrestrained workings of the property market. • There is a legacy of distrust, as well as limited capacity, to be overcome • Access independent technical aid. • Access good research and practice.

  8. COMMUNITY LED NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNINGFIRST THOUGHTS • CRITICAL PATH / ACTION PLAN : DO NOT START UNTIL PROCESS , STRUCTURES , RESOURCES, DEFINITION OF SOME / ALL NEIGHBOURHOODS ARE BROADLY IN PLACE • OVERVIEW / STEERING : USE COUNCILLORS / VAC / CEN / OTHER EXPERIENCE • BE PRAGMATIC – START WITH THE MOST ESTABLISHED , MANAGEABLE, LEAST CONTROVERSIAL , NEIGHBOURHOODS AND CUSTOMISE / ADAPT PROCESSES ACCORDINGLY • LIKELY TO BE RELATIVELY FREE OF DEVELOPMENT PRESSURE • OUTCOME MORE LIKELY TO BE ALONG SCS / LAA LINES • TEMPORARY USES AND SMALL SCALE SPATIAL AND NON SPATIAL OUTCOMES

  9. SOME PREREQUISITES FOR PARTNERSHIP OR COLLABORATIVE WORKING • MAYBE, UP FRONT, A COMPACT OR CHARTER • THE ABILITY TO PUT YOURSELF IN OTHER PEOPLES SHOES - TO SPEAK A COMMON LANGUAGE OR DIALECTS OF THE SAME LANGUAGE • CAPACITY AND RESOURCES • TRUST AND COMMITMENT OVER TIME THROUGH THICK AND THIN • GENUINE / CREDIBLE / MUTUAL RESPECT / BEHAVIOUR • SOMETHING IN IT FOR BOTH / ALL PARTIES • COMPROMISE • BROADLY COMMON AGENDA AND OBJECTIVES / ACTION PLAN • SHARING OF INFORMATION / RESPONSIBILITY / POWER • WHILE APPRECIATING DIFFERENCES , SOME MEASURE OF EQUAL SAY • APPRECIATING AND MAXIMISING THE STRENGTHS AND PROGRESSIVELY ADDRESSING THE WEAKNESSES OF EACH PARTY • VALUE OF “EARLY WINS”

  10. RESOURCESFIRST THOUGHTS • All Local Authority Planners , as part of CPD, to work at least one year in the Neighbourhood / community, as Community Planners. • Access / fund CEN and existing CVS networks and experience in Camden • Access existing Higher Education and University courses, teachers, students and researchers eg Bartlett School UCL • Access London wide independent expertise such as Planning Aid for London, Community Development foundation, London Civic Forum etc • Neighbourhood Council as a Community Development Trust ?

More Related