210 likes | 331 Vues
This presentation discusses the potential of forage-based fuels and the challenges faced in their production. Emphasizing energy independence and the need for value-added crops, it explores recent research on switchgrass and cooperative projects across states. The economic viability of producing biofuels from agricultural residues and switchgrass is evaluated, highlighting the importance of integrated systems for yield improvement. It also addresses logistical challenges in biomass transport, storage, and market dynamics that affect the sustainability of biofuel production.
E N D
Making Fuel from Forages Ryan Lock (in for the Hawaiian vacationing) Robert Kallenbach Division of Plant Sciences
A more sophisticated model E3 Biofuels, Shawnee, KS
Agriculture has some decisions to make • Energy independence • Value added crops • Competition for commodities • Interesting times for Price discovery • My background is old school • Cattle/forages/feed CRP acres show promise as a buffer (Average $50/acre, currently)
Recent Biofuel research at Mizzou • Switchgrass • Cooperative project with 8 other states • Cool-season CRP and CRP renovation with legumes and Switchgrass • Cooperative project with 4 other states Big challenges require teamwork
MU Switchgrass data Latitudinal and Longitudinal Adaptation of Switchgrass Populations M. D. Caslera,*, K. P. Vogelb, C. M. Taliaferroc, N. J. Ehlked, J. D. Berdahle, E. C. Brummerf, R. L. Kallenbachg, C. P. Westh and R. B. Mitchellb • Crop Sci 47:2249-2260 (2007) Take home messages: Not all varieties of switchgrass are created equal A variety should not be grown more than 1 hardiness zone away from its ancestral origin Cave-in-Rock most widely adapted to migration
MU cool-season CRP data Switchgrass dominated warm-season mixture, ND Switchgrass dominated warm-season mixture with legume, KA Tall fescue dominated cool-season mixture with two-cut system, MO Tall wheatgrass dominated cool-season mixture with legume, MT Switchgrass dominated warm-season mixture, OK
MU cool-season CRP data • Yields not tremendous • Next logical step • Integrate Switchgrass to beef up yields • legumes to provide N • Yellow sweetclover • Switchgrass • Binary mixture • w/without glyphosate to establish
Challenges • Production • Mandates • Approx. 16 Billion gallons of ethanol from biomass • At 100 gallons per ton conversion efficiency = 160 Million tons of biomass needed • At an ave. yield of 5 t/a we need 32 million acres • A typical 50 Million gallon/yr plant would need 500,000 tons of cellulosic materials – about 1 million big round bales
Challenges • Transport – about 4 times higher for biomass than grains • Corn 44 lb/ft3 • Biomass 10 to 12 lb/ft3 • Storage - where do you keep 1 million bales without having them deteriorate? • Outside storage helps? • Enough to fill Memorial Stadium level full with bales 5 times
Challenges • Economic benefit to producers – • Current prices for a great deal of biomass greater as forage than fuel • Most cellulosic models built on $35-45/ton feedstock • Higher fuel prices would improve feedstock value • Fertilizer costs for N-P-K • $40/T for cool-season crp • $25/T for switchgrass • Organic matter • losses from removing crop residues • gains under crp w/switchgrass (2.4 and 4 Mg/ha) • N rate dependant (Lee et al., Agron. J. 99:462–468 (2007)).
Challenges • Risk management • Can you hedge these commodities?
Summary • Find 3 million acres to grow corn on • Ensure CRP acres can provide enough cellulosic material • Figure out how to supply CRP with N from legumes