1 / 22

Dialogue on Cooperative Action

Dialogue on Cooperative Action. India Presentation Surya P. Sethi Principal Adviser Energy Nov 16, 2006. Outline. Review of Annex I actions to reduce GHGs emissions India in the global context Low carbon pathway: sectoral opportunities in India CDM: in the post 2012 regime.

xue
Télécharger la présentation

Dialogue on Cooperative Action

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Dialogue on Cooperative Action India Presentation Surya P. Sethi Principal Adviser Energy Nov 16, 2006

  2. Outline • Review of Annex I actions to reduce GHGs emissions • India in the global context • Low carbon pathway: sectoral opportunities in India • CDM: in the post 2012 regime

  3. Review of Annex I National Communications - Highlights

  4. GHG emission changes in select Annex I countries (w/o LULUCF) over KP target/EU burden sharing • Only UK, Sweden and France have been able to achieve their targets (Note: Sweden’s target had been +4% and that of France 0%) • Germany shows good progress but is still behind the target • EC15 at minus 0.6 is much behind the target of minus 8% • GHG emissions in Canada, Italy, Japan & Netherlands have increased, against their emission reduction targets. Norway has far exceeded the permitted increase in emissions. UNFCCC 2006

  5. Changes in GHG emissions (1990-2004) CO2vs. other gases in select Annex I countries • Emission reduction in Germany, UK and EC 15 is mainly due to reductions of non CO2 gases • Only UK and Germany have achieved CO2 reduction UNFCCC 2006

  6. Emission Projections for 2010 in percent of base year emissions(UNFCCC 2006) • Neither Annex I nor EU 15 will meet Kyoto targets even with additional measures • The situation worsens if EITs excluded

  7. India in the Global Context

  8. India’s Growth Strategy Sustainable • Source : Key Energy Indicators IEA 2005; Planning Commission, India

  9. Per-capita consumption levels per-unit of inhabited land area • India ranks the lowest

  10. CO2 Emissions from Key Material Inputs for Infrastructure Development 1771 • S1 Scenario assumes India matches consumption levels of EU 15 on a per capita per square kilometer bases for Aluminum, Cement & Steel by 2031-32 • Co2 emissions increase from 1251 million tonnes (BAU) to 3022 million tonnes (S1) in 2031  Increase of 1771 million tonnes in S1 relative to BAU in 2031

  11. Low carbon pathway: Sectoral opportunities in India

  12. Relative CO2 emissions from Energy Sector Activities CO2 emission (2003) India 1050 (million tonnes), World (24983), China (3760) USA (5729) CO2 emissions/capita (2003): India 0.99 (tonnes), World (3.99), China (2.90), USA (19.68) Source: (IEA, Statistics, CO2 emissions from Fuel Combustion 1971-2003, 2005) Share of CO2 emissions from Large Point Sources (LPS) of energy and transformation industries (1995) Fossil power (94): 47% Steel (11): 6 (%) Cement (85): 9% (Source: Garg and Shukla, 2004) Source: NATCOM India, 2004

  13. Sectoral CDM Opportunities • Power Generation • Accelerated Renovation and Modernization of Old Plants • Clean coal technologies • Ultra supercritical • IGCC based on indigenous coal • IGCC based on imported coal • Efficient Gas (H-Frame CCGT) • Renewables (Wind, Small Hydro, PV, Biomass) • Iron and Steel Production • Efficiency improvement in existing plants (all retrofitted by 2017) • Introduction of Best Available Technology (BAT) in BF-BOF plant • Increased Share of BF-BOF (with BAT) in total steel production • Cement Production • Modernization of existing 4 and 5 stage to 6 stage systems (all retrofitted by 2017) • Waste heat recovery based cogeneration (30% electricity saving) • Increased share of blended cement • Reduction of process CO2 emissions during clinker production

  14. Sectoral CDM Potential During 2012-17(Power, Iron &Steel, Cement) • CO2 Emissions reduction potential of about 550 million tonnes during 2012-17 • Highest emissions reduction potential is in the power sector (309 MT) • India’s cement and steel sectors are closer to international emission norms as reflected by their lower reduction potential

  15. Additional Investment Requirements (2012-17) for Transition to Low Carbon Path, vis-a-vis Select Development Outlays of GoI for Tenth Plan Additional investment requirements to the tune of 25.1 Billion US$ (at 2001 Prices) similar order of magnitude as plan support for meeting social and environmental development targets

  16. Marginal Abatement Cost Curve for Power, Steel and Cement Sectors (All options) [For 2012-17] • Total additional investment requirement : 25.1 billion US$ • For options with positive mitigation cost total additional investment requirement : 22.3 billion US$ • Mitigation cost is highest for SPV: 925.8 $/tonne . This has not been plotted

  17. Marginal Abatement Cost Curve for Power Sector (for 2012-17) • Total additional investment requirement : 17 billion US$ • For options with positive mitigation cost total additional investment requirement : 15 billion US$ • Mitigation cost is highest for SPV: 925.8 $/tonne . This has not been plotted

  18. India’s Suggestions at the G-8 Summit • Place Energy Efficient and sustainable technologies in limited public domain • Replace traditional technology transfer with collaborative R&D • New Multilateral Window to provide additional funding for the above against the security of robust long term carbon markets

  19. CDM in the post 2012 regime

  20. Ensuring a Carbon Market: Post 2012 Regime • A long-term market • Unequivocal commitment to continuation of CDM post 2012 • Deeper ER cuts by Annex I countries • Longer commitment period • Single universal unit example: CERs • Urgent need for guidelines on programmatic CDM • Automatic approval of projects below Sectoral Baselines

  21. Ensuring a Carbon Market: Post 2012 Regime…. • Simplified process for determining additionality of small solar, wind and hydro • Transparent, consistent and non- discriminatory process for registration of projects by the EB • With the above in place venture capital would follow CDM even in regions where CDM projects are currently scarce

  22. An ounce of practice is worth more than a ton of preaching

More Related