Data Management for Research

Data Management for Research Michael A. Kohn, MD, MPP 7 January 2003

Assumptions about Students • Actively involved in a clinical research study • Some experience with entering and maintaining data in single-table spreadsheet or statistical software

Housekeeping • Check Lab sheet to confirm which lab you are in. • Labs will be in Library 222. • Bring a diskette and your syllabus to labs. • Syllabus and “Learn MS Access 2000” CD

Requirements • Turn in all 4 assignments on time • Turn in course evaluation

Course Objective Learn how to develop a multi-table, relational database for a research study using Microsoft Access. Example: Infant Jaundice Study

Data Management for Clinical Research • We know how to • define the study population, the independent variables and the outcome variables; • measure these variables and anticipate problems with measurement; • analyze the results.

Data Management for Clinical Research • The DBMS (Database Management System) is for • entering and storing the measurements, • entering and storing the other information necessary to administer the study (subject contact information, exam schedules, reimbursement records, etc.), • monitoring the study, and • either analyzing the results or formatting the results for analysis.

Four Types of Research Database • Combination of paper files, Excel spreadsheets, and direct keyboard entry into the statistical analysis package. • Desktop multi-table relational database. • Client-Server multi-table relational database. • Internet database server.

Advantages of a computerized database • Ease of data entry • Automatic data validation • Automatic error checking • Alternative is a stack of paper forms

Advantages of a Multi-Table Relational Database • Eliminates redundancy • Ensures data integrity • Note: Unless you plan on doing your analysis long-hand, you always need a computer database of some sort (a Stata dataset or an Excel spreadsheet may be adequate); you don’t always need a multi-table relational DBMS (like Microsoft Access).

Multi-Table Relational Database Collection of spreadsheet-like, two-dimensional tables. Rows in Tables = Records Columns in Tables = Attributes Tables are related one-to-many, many-to-many, and one-to-one.

Jaundice and Infant Feeding Study Cohort study to determine the 5-year neuropsychiatric sequelae of infants with neonatal jaundice or feeding disorders.

Infant Jaundice Study (Our fictional version of JIFee) Methods: Design-Cohort study. Setting-Single, urban medical center Subjects-Infants with neonatal jaundice and randomly selected non-jaundiced infants Independent Variable-Presence or absence of jaundice Outcome Variable- Neuropsychiatric score (ranging from 55 to 145) at age 5 Analysis- ?

Infant Jaundice Study Data • Approximately 400 children • 5 examiners (doctors) • Approximately 700 neuropsychiatric examinations, measuring weight, height, and “NPScore” (IQ) • Some children to be examined more than once • No examiner to see the same child twice • If child died before age 5, store age and circumstances of death

Assignments Lab 1: Tables and Relationships 1/14/2003 Send Access file LastnameLab1.mdb to Andrew High, (ahigh@psg.ucsf.edu) by 1/20/2003. Lab 2: Forms, Queries, and Reports 1/21/2003 Send Access file LastnameLab2.mdb to Andrew High, (ahigh@psg.ucsf.edu) by 1/27/2003. We will work through these assignments in the labs, so you don’t need to have Access2000 at home.

Assignments (cont’d) Lab 3: Exporting and Analyzing Data 1/28/2003 Determine if neonatal jaundice was associated with the 5-year neuropsychiatric scores and create a table, figure, or paragraph appropriate for the “Results” section of a manuscript summarizing the association. Write a sentence or two for the “Methods” section on inter-rater reliability. (Use Bland and Altman, BMJ 1996; 313:744) Send assignment to ahigh@psg.ucsf.edu by 2/3/2003.

Assignments (cont’d) Class session 5 (not a lab): Planning and Budgeting for Data Management 2/4/2003 Write a one-page data management section for your research study protocol and create a budget for data management. If you do not have your own research study protocol, write the data management section and create a budget for the fictional Infant Jaundice Study protocol. We can compare your budget with the real budget of JIFee. Send assignment to ahigh@psg.ucsf.edu by 2/10/2003.

Table of Study Subjects Infant Jaundice Study Table of Subjects = “Baby” Row = Individual Infant Columns = ID#, Name, DOB, Sex, Jaundice. If one set of measurements per infant, put measurements in subject table. This is a single-table database.

Demonstration Label columns and enter rows of data in datasheet view

Demonstration Table design or “data dictionary” view

Demonstration Disallowed values Duplicate primary keys This automatic error checking and data validation IS why you need to enter your data into a computer; it is NOT why you need a relational DBMS. Many single-table products (Filemaker Pro, SAS FSP, even Excel) can do error checking and data validation.

Acceptable table showing one set of exam results per participant.

Table of Study Subjects Table of Study Subjects Row = Individual Infant Columns = ID#, Name, DOB, Sex, Jaundice If some infants have more than one exam, what do you do?

Unacceptable table showing multiple exam results per study participant.

Common Error • If you find yourself creating multiple columns for the same measurement, e.g., Date1, Score1, Date2, Score2, Date3, Score3, … • Or if your table is more than about 30 columns wide, • It is time to restructure your table.

Unacceptable table with participant-specific data duplicated for each exam. (Note problem with Helen’s DOB.)

Normalization If some infants have multiple exams, “normalize” the records into two tables, one for subjects and one for examinations.

Figure 6. Data normalized into two tables: one (“Baby”) with rows comprising subject-specific information; the other (“Exam”) with rows comprising exam-specific information. Note that Helen can only have one birth date. Subjects with no exams, e.g. Alejandro, still appear in the database. “SubjectID” functions as the primary key in the “Baby” table and as the foreign key in the “Exam” table.

Figure 7. Relationships diagram showing the one-to-many relationship between the table of subjects (“Baby”) and the table of measurements (“Exam”).

Demonstration Inability to create integrity violations with normalized tables. This IS why you need a multi-table relational DBMS.

Table of Examiners Neuropsychiatric outcomes are assessed by 5 different examiners (doctors) May want to assess whether examiner characteristics (sex, specialty, age) affect neuropsychiatric scores Doctor examines many children; each child may have more than one exam; but a child is never examined by the same doctor twice.

Table of examiners with multiple examiner-specific fields.

Figure 9. Undesirable table in which examiner-specific data is repeated with each examination. (Note that Dr. Novello is a female pediatrician for two examinations and a male internist for an exam in between.)

Figure 10. Normalization into two tables, one for exam-specific information and one for examiner-specific information. (Note that Dr. Novello cannot change specialty or gender between examinations.) “DocID” functions as a second foreign key in the “Exam” table. (The other foreign key is “SubjectID”.)

Figure 11. Relationships diagram showing the relationships between the table of subjects (Baby), the table of measurements (Exam) and the table of examiners (Doctor). The “Exam” table functions as a linkage or join table between “Baby” and “Doctor” creating a “many-to-many” relationship between study subjects and examiners.

One-to-One Relationship: Infants and Deaths.

Some fields are subject specific but valued for only a few subjects. Maintaining columns for these fields in the table of subjects leads to empty fields and wasted space.

Figure 12. Some fields are subject specific but valued for only a few subjects. Maintaining columns for these fields in the table of subjects leads to empty fields and wasted space.

Figure 13. Creating a separate table with a one-to-one relationship eliminates the empty fields and wasted space.

Figure 14. The relationships diagram now includes a table (“Death”) with a one-to-one relationship with the table of subjects (“Baby”). A subject can only have one record in the one-to-one-related table, but the vast majority of subjects will not have any “Death” record.

Undesirability of Storing Calculated Values Store raw data, not calculated fields, e.g., store dates and times; calculate intervals. Storing a patient’s birth date allows calculation of his or her exact age on the date of a particular measurement.

Figure 15. Calculated fields such as “AgeInMonths” are undesirable. What if the birth date for SubjectID 2322 (Helen) is corrected in the “Baby” table?

Demonstration • Calculate Age • Calculate BMI

Standard Data Entry Conventions Several conventions for data entry and display have developed over time. Although most users of screen forms are not aware of these conventions, they have come to expect them subconsciously. For example, a series of mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive choices is usually displayed as an “option group” consisting of several different “radio buttons”, whereas choices which are not mutually exclusive are displayed as check boxes. N.B. An “option group” of mutually exclusive choices is a single column or field. A group of N check boxes represents N yes/no fields.

Use check boxes when options are not mutually exclusive. (5 fields) Use radio buttons when options are mutually exclusive. (1 field) Computer chart abstraction form showing two common data entry conventions.

Demonstration Option group for examiner’s medical specialty

Guidelines for Data Management in Clinical Research Establish the database tables, their rows and columns, and their relationships correctly at the outset. A poorly organized database makes data maintenance and retrieval nearly impossible. Make sure the data are normalized. The data structures should never require duplicate data entry or redundant storage. ? MS Genetics Example

Guidelines for Data Management in Clinical Research Establish and follow naming conventions for columns and tables. Short field names without spaces or underscores are convenient for programming, querying, and other manipulations. Instead of spaces or underscores, use “IntraCaps” (upper case letters within the variable name) to distinguish words, e.g. “StudyID”, “FName”, “FdDisord”, or “ExamDate”. Table names should be singular, e.g. “Baby” instead of “Babies”, “Exam” instead of “Exams”.

Guidelines for Data Management in Clinical Research Obtain baseline demographic and clinical information about members of the study population from existing computer databases. Avoid re-entering data which are already available (in digital formats) from other sources. In the JIFee Study, the patient demographic data and contact information are obtained from the hospital database. Computer systems can almost always produce text-delimited or fixed-column-width character files that the database management system can import.

Guidelines for Data Management in Clinical Research Minimize the extent to which study measurements are recorded on paper forms. Enter data directly into the computer database or move data from paper forms into the computer database as close to the data collection time as possible. When you define a variable in a computer database, you specify both its format and its domain or range of allowed values. Using these format and domain specifications, computer data entry forms give immediate feedback about improper formats and values that are out of range. The best time to receive this feedback is when the study subject is still on site.

Data Management for Research