The Best Advice You Could Ever Get About Sophont

1. It is simple to confuse the concepts of "virtual reality" and a "electronic design of reality (simulation)". The former is a self-contained Universe, replete with its "laws of physics" and "reasoning". It can bear resemblance to the real life or not. It can be consistent or not. It can interact with the real life or not. In short, it is an arbitrary environment. On the other hand, a design of reality must have a direct and strong relationship to the world. It should comply with the guidelines of physics and of reasoning. The lack of such a relationship renders it worthless. A flight simulator is not much great in a world without airplanes or if it ignores the laws of nature. A technical analysis program is ineffective without a stock exchange or if its mathematically erroneous. Yet, the two concepts are typically baffled due to the fact that they are both moderated by and live on computer systems. The computer is a self-contained (though not closed) Universe. It includes the hardware, the information and the instructions for the control of the data (software). It is, for that reason, by meaning, a virtual truth. It is flexible and can associate its reality with the world outside. However it can also refrain from doing so. This is the threatening "what if" in artificial intelligence (AI). What if a computer system were to decline to associate its internal (virtual) reality with the reality of its makers? What if it were to enforce its own reality on us and make it the fortunate one? In the aesthetically tantalizing film, "The Matrix", a type of AI computer systems takes over the world. It gathers human embryos in laboratories called "fields". It then feeds them through grim looking tubes and keeps them immersed in gelatinous liquid in cocoons. This new "machine types" derives its energy needs from the electricity produced by the billions of bodies therefore preserved. A sophisticated, all-pervasive, computer system program called "The Matrix" creates a "world" inhabited by the consciousness of the regrettable human batteries. Ensconced in their shells, they see themselves walking, talking, working and making love. This is a tangible and olfactory phantasm masterfully created by the Matrix. Its computing power is mind boggling. It creates the minutest details and reams of data in a stunningly successful effort to preserve the impression. A group of human wrongdoers succeeds to find out the trick of the Matrix. They form an underground and live aboard a ship, loosely interacting with a halcyon city called "Zion", the last bastion of resistance. In one of the scenes, Cypher, among the rebels problems. Over a glass of (illusory) rubicund white wine and (spectral) juicy steak, he presents the main dilemma of the motion picture. Is it better to live gladly in a perfectly detailed deception-- or to make it through unhappily however free of its hold? The Matrix manages the minds of all the humans worldwide. It is a bridge between them, they inter-connected through it. It makes them share the same sights, smells and textures. They remember. They compete. They make choices. The Matrix is sufficiently complex to allow for this evident absence of determinism and universality of free will. The root question is: is there any distinction in between making decisions and knowing of making them (not having made them)? If one is uninformed of the presence of the Matrix, the response is no. From the inside, as a part of the Matrix, making decisions and seeming making them equal states. Only an outside observer-- one who in belongings of complete details concerning both the Matrix and the people-- can discriminate. Moreover, if the Matrix were a computer program of limitless intricacy, no observer (finite or limitless) would have had the ability to state with any certainty whose a decision was-- the Matrix's or the human's. And since the Matrix, for all intents and purposes, is limitless compared to the mind of any single, tube-nourished, individual-- it is safe to state that the states of "making a decision" and "appearing to be deciding" are subjectively indistinguishable. No individual within the Matrix would have the ability to tell the difference. His or her life would seem to him or her as genuine as ours are to us. The Matrix might be deterministic-- however this determinism is unattainable to specific minds since of the complexity involved. When faced with a trillion deterministic courses, one would be justified to feel that he exercised totally free, unconstrained will in selecting one of them. Free will and determinism are indistinguishable at a particular level of complexity. Yet, we KNOW that the Matrix is various to our world. It is NOT the same. This is an intuitive kind of knowledge, for sure, however this does not interfere with its firmness. If there is no subjective difference in between the Matrix

2. and our Universe, there must be an unbiased one. Another essential sentence is uttered by Morpheus, the leader of the rebels. He says to "The Chosen One" (the Messiah) that it is actually the year 2199, though the Matrix offers the impression that it is 1999. This is where the Matrix and truth diverge. Though a human who would experience both would discover them equivalent-- objectively they are various. In one of them (the Matrix), people have no objective TIME (though the Matrix may have it). The other (truth) is governed by it. Under the spell of the Matrix, individuals feel as though time passes. They have working watches. The sun increases and sets. Seasons change. They age and die. This is not entirely an impression. Their bodies https://martinhefr892.postach.io/post/ten-horrible-mistakes-you-re-making-with-von-neumann-probe do decay and die, as ours do. They are not exempt from the laws of nature. However their AWARENESS of time is computer system produced. The Matrix is sufficiently sophisticated and knowledgeable to keep a close connection in between the physical state of the human (his health and age) and his consciousness of the passage of time. The standard guidelines of time-- for instance, its asymmetry-- belong to the program. But this is precisely it. Time in the minds of these people is program-generated, not reality-induced. It is not the derivative of modification and irreversible (thermodynamic and other) processes OUT THERE. Their minds are part of a computer system program and the computer system program belongs of their minds. Their bodies are static, deteriorating in their protective nests. Nothing takes place to them except in their minds. They have no physical impact on the world. They effect no change. These things set the Matrix and truth apart. To "qualify" as reality a two-way interaction need to take place. One flow of data is when truth affects the minds of individuals (as does the Matrix). The obverse, but similarly required, type of data circulation is when people understand truth and affect it. The Matrix sets off a time sensation in people the exact same method that deep space triggers a time sensation in us. Something does take place OUT THERE and it is called the Matrix. In this sense, the Matrix is real, it is the reality of these people. It maintains the requirement of the very first kind of circulation of data. But it stops working the 2nd test: individuals do not understand that it exists or any of its attributes, nor do they affect it irreversibly. They do not alter the Matrix. Paradoxically, the rebels do affect the Matrix (they practically destroy it). In doing so, they make it REAL. It is their REALITY due to the fact that they UNDERSTAND it and they irreversibly ALTER it. Using this dual-track test, "virtual" reality IS a truth, albeit, at this stage, of a deterministic type. It affects our minds, we understand that it exists and we affect it in return. Our options and actions irreversibly alter the state of the system. This altered state, in turn, impacts our minds. This interaction IS what we call "truth". With the development of stochastic and quantum virtual truth generators-- the distinction in between "genuine" and "virtual" will fade. The Matrix therefore is not impossible. But that it is possible-- does not make it real. Appendix-- God and Gdel The 2nd movie in the Matrix series-- "The Matrix Reloaded"-- culminates in an encounter in between Neo (" The One") and the architect of the Matrix (a very finely camouflaged God, white beard and all). The designer notifies Neo that he is the 6th reincarnation of The One which Zion, a shelter for those decoupled from the Matrix, has been ruined before and will be destroyed once again.

3. The architect goes on to reveal that his efforts to render the Matrix "unified" (best) stopped working. He was, therefore, forced to present a component of intuition into the formulas to reflect the unpredictability and "grotesqueries" of humanity. This built-in error tends to build up gradually and to threaten the very existence of the Matrix-- for this reason the need to eliminate Zion, the seat of malcontents and rebels, regularly. God seems unaware of the work of an essential, though eccentric, Czech-Austrian mathematical logician, Kurt Gdel (1906-1978). A passing acquaintance with his 2 theorems would have saved the architect a lot of time. Gdel's First Incompleteness Theorem mentions that every consistent axiomatic logical system, sufficient to reveal arithmetic, includes true but unprovable (" not decidable") sentences. In specific cases (when the system is omega- consistent), both stated sentences and their negation are unprovable. The system corresponds and true-- but not "complete" because not all its sentences can be decided as real or false by either being shown or by being refuted. The 2nd Incompleteness Theorem is even more earth-shattering. It states that no consistent official logical system can prove its own consistency. The system may be complete-- but then we are not able to show, utilizing its axioms and inference laws, that it corresponds Simply put, a computational system, like the Matrix, can either be total and inconsistent-- or constant and incomplete. By trying to build a system both complete and consistent, God has contravened of Gdel's theorem and made possible the 3rd sequel, "Matrix Revolutions".