1 / 4

The Twain-Douglass Debates

This debate explores the effectiveness of Mark Twain's satirical fiction compared to Frederick Douglass's autobiographical non-fiction in addressing slavery and racial injustice. Both writers communicated powerful messages during a pivotal time in American history, aiming to challenge cultural assumptions about race. In this discussion, we will present two strong supporting arguments for our position, provide textual evidence from relevant works, anticipate opposing refutations, and prepare counter-arguments, ultimately evaluating the impact of each writer's approach and their contributions to social justice.

yardley
Télécharger la présentation

The Twain-Douglass Debates

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Twain-Douglass Debates • Prompt: Considering that both Mark Twain and Frederick Douglass were writing at a similar time and place, and for a similar purpose—to expose the injustice of slavery and to change their culture's assumptions about race—which writer most likely communicated his message most effectively: Twain with his satirical fiction or Douglass with his autobiographical non-fiction? • You and your partner will be assigned a position.

  2. The Twain-Douglass Debates • Come up with the two strongest supporting arguments for your position. • For each supporting argument, locate two pieces of textual evidence (from either work) that could support the argument. • For each supporting argument, anticipate your opponent's refutation—how they might try to take down your supporting argument—and consider how you will counter it. • Try to anticipate the two supporting arguments of your opposition. • Come up with a concession/refutation combo to counter each of your opponent's arguments. • Locate a piece of textual evidence (from either work) that could support your refutations.

  3. Outline your argumentation Topic Sentence Details & Elaboration • Supporting argument #1 • Supporting evidence (include page #) • Supporting evidence (include page #) • Anticipated opponent refutation and your counter-argument • Supporting argument #2 • Supporting evidence (include page #) • Supporting evidence (include page #) • Anticipated opponent refutation and your counter-argument • Anticipated opponent argument #1 & Refutation • Supporting evidence (include page #) • Anticipated opponent argument #2 & Refutation • Supporting evidence (include page #) Commentary

  4. Post-Debate Evaluation • How well did you anticipate your opponent's arguments? • How reasonable did you and your partner remain?  Did you offer any concessions so as to seem more reasonable? • Were you able to successfully refute any of your opponents arguments? • How well did you defend your arguments against your opponent's refutations?

More Related