1 / 41

GAINESVILLE HALL COUNTY Comprehensive Plan Update

GAINESVILLE HALL COUNTY Comprehensive Plan Update. Land Demand & Development Capacity May 28, 2003. Tonight we will Discuss:. Where we are in the Planning Process Why we do a Demand and Capacity Analysis The method and results of the Demand Analysis

yazid
Télécharger la présentation

GAINESVILLE HALL COUNTY Comprehensive Plan Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. GAINESVILLE HALL COUNTYComprehensive Plan Update Land Demand & Development Capacity May 28, 2003

  2. Tonight we will Discuss: • Where we are in the Planning Process • Why we do a Demand and Capacity Analysis • The method and results of the Demand Analysis • The method and results of the Capacity Analysis • Comparison of the Demand to Capacity • What this means for the City/County

  3. Project Initiation Land Demand Analysis Inventories Vision and Policy Development Plan Development Implementation Strategy Public Outreach Land Capacity Analysis Where are we in this process?

  4. Why do a Demand & Capacity Analysis • Identify potential future growth pressures • Identify the current capacity of the City/County to deal with potential growth • To create a baseline for “what if” scenarios • To establish a foundation for the discussion of policy questions • How should we prepare for the future?

  5. Caution: These analyses and forecasts represent what could happen if current trends continue and current policies are implemented. They do not reflect a value judgment as to whether they are desirable or not.

  6. What Have We Heard? Five Consensus Planning Themes: • Quality Growth • Efficient Growth • Fiscally Sound Growth • Urban and Rural Growth • Coordinated Growth

  7. Five Attributes of Growth • Location of Growth • Amount of Growth • Rate and Timing of Growth • Fiscal Impact of Growth • Quality and Environmental Impact of Growth

  8. The Demand Analysis Bill Ross

  9. Demand AnalysisMethodology • Population and employment forecasts • Translate population into dwelling units in different categories • Translate employment into land use categories • Translate employment into square footage and acreage

  10. Forecasts • Past trends – we looked back: • Thirty years (1970-2000) • Recent past (the 1990s) • Natural growth process affected by: • Market response to land availability • Infrastructure constraints • Redevelopment, communication diversity • Technological innovation

  11. Forecasts • Assumptions • Past trends represent a valid anticipation of future change in Hall County and its cities. • Those past trends will continue with few changes in the market forces that created them. • Factors that would otherwise limit growth naturally will not begin to affect growth until the latter portion of the 2030 forecast horizon.

  12. Forecasts Hall County 2003—2030 Population 162,372—489,366 Employment 95,605—280,792

  13. Gainesville 2003—2030 Population 29,662—87,309 Employment 51,924—92,088 Forecasts

  14. Comparison to Other Counties

  15. Comparison to Other Counties

  16. Residential Demand

  17. Nonresidential Demand

  18. Questions about Demand?

  19. The Capacity Analysis Greg Dale

  20. Capacity Analysis Methodology • Identify available land (Gross Land) • Identify constraints to land (Net Land) • Identify Potential Development Areas (PDAs) • Assign Development Density • Calculate Residential Unit and Nonresidential Building Area Capacity

  21. How much land is available? • Assumptions • Vacant Parcels in City • Most land zoned for agriculture in the County • Conservation land, in floodplains or stream buffers is not available • Certain small fragments of land are not included • Only includes land in Gainesville and unincorporated Hall County

  22. Net Land • Assumptions • The way steep slope reduces the capacity of land varies • 15 % of Gross Land is needed for infrastructure

  23. Residential Capacity Assumptions • Calculated for areas currently designated for residential development • Guided by existing Comprehensive Plan, adopted land use density and Zoning Regulations • Different between City and County • High and low scenario • 108,109 Net Acres for Residential

  24. Net Residential Acreage Hall County –104,760 acres Gainesville- 3,079 acres

  25. Residential Capacity Density Assumptions

  26. Residential Unit Capacity (Adjusted) 72,922-131,707 Total Units

  27. Nonresidential CapacityAssumptions • Density based on established “floor area ratios” • Capacity calculated for • Office • Commercial/Retail • Industrial • 13,322 net acres of nonresidential land

  28. Net Nonresidential Acreage Commercial/Retail-918 acres Office- 3,281 acres Industrial-9,122 acres

  29. Nonresidential Density Assumptions

  30. Nonresidential Building Area Capacity (Adjusted) 130-157 million SF total nonresidential

  31. Capacity Questions ?

  32. Residential Demand vs. Capacity

  33. Residential Demand vs. Capacity Single Family New Units

  34. Nonresidential Demand vs. Capacity

  35. Implications ofDemand and Capacity • There is potential market pressure to “build out” most of Hall County under the current planning policies within the planning horizon • This means that we need to be thinking about the “end state” for the City and County • In some ways, this makes the planning simpler – we are not planning for a portion of the county, only to be revisited again and again

  36. Implications ofDemand and Capacity • We should assume that the future pattern of land uses, intensities, densities, and character proposed in this plan is the final pattern • We can identify this final pattern relative to the final level of infrastructure needed to support it • Once we establish the final state, then we address how to get there in the most orderly and efficient way, which includes rate of growth issues, the relationship of land use to infrastructure, the allocation of costs of the infrastructure

  37. Next Month: • Examine the demand and capacity further • Where do we have capacity? • Is it in the right places, both from a market perspective, and from a land use perspective? • How does the capacity of different types of residential land use compare to demand?

  38. Next Month: • Is the “end state” suggested by current policies what the community wants to be in 15-30 years? • What are the policy implications for the Comprehensive Plan?

  39. Questions and Comments

More Related