1 / 64

Econ 240C

Econ 240C. Lecture 16. Part I. VAR. Does the Federal Funds Rate Affect Capacity Utilization?. The Federal Funds Rate is one of the principal monetary instruments of the Federal Reserve Does it affect the economy in “real terms”, as measured by capacity utilization. Preliminary Analysis.

yetty
Télécharger la présentation

Econ 240C

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Econ 240C Lecture 16

  2. Part I. VAR • Does the Federal Funds Rate Affect Capacity Utilization?

  3. The Federal Funds Rate is one of the principal monetary instruments of the Federal Reserve • Does it affect the economy in “real terms”, as measured by capacity utilization

  4. Preliminary Analysis

  5. The Time Series, Monthly, January 1967through May 2003

  6. Federal Funds Rate: July 1954-April 2007

  7. Capacity Utilization Manufacturing: Jan. 1972- April 2007

  8. Changes in FFR & Capacity Utilization

  9. Contemporaneous Correlation

  10. Dynamics: Cross-correlation

  11. In Levels

  12. In differences

  13. Granger Causality

  14. Granger Causality

  15. Granger Causality

  16. Granger Causality

  17. Estimation of VAR

  18. Estimation Results • OLS Estimation • each series is positively autocorrelated • lags 1 and 24 for dcapu • lags 1, 2, 7, 9, 13, 16 • each series depends on the other • dcapu on dffr: negatively at lags 10, 12, 17, 21 • dffr on dcapu: positively at lags 1, 2, 9, 10 and negatively at lag 12

  19. Correlogram of DFFR

  20. Correlogram of DCAPU

  21. We Have Mutual Causality, But We Already Knew That DCAPU DFFR

  22. Interpretation • We need help • Rely on assumptions

  23. What If • What if there were a pure shock to dcapu • as in the primitive VAR, a shock that only affects dcapu immediately

  24. Primitive VAR

  25. The Logic of What If • A shock, edffr , to dffr affects dffr immediately, but if dcapu depends contemporaneously on dffr, then this shock will affect it immediately too • so assume b1 iszero, then dcapu depends only on its own shock, edcapu , first period • But we are not dealing with the primitive, but have substituted out for the contemporaneous terms • Consequently, the errors are no longer pure but have to be assumed pure

  26. DCAPU shock DFFR

  27. Standard VAR • dcapu(t) = (a1 + b1 a2)/(1- b1 b2) +[ (g11+ b1 g21)/(1- b1 b2)] dcapu(t-1) + [ (g12+ b1 g22)/(1- b1 b2)] dffr(t-1) + [(d1+ b1 d2 )/(1- b1 b2)] x(t) + (edcapu(t) + b1 edffr(t))/(1- b1 b2) • But if we assume b1 =0, • thendcapu(t) = a1 +g11 dcapu(t-1) + g12 dffr(t-1) + d1 x(t) + edcapu(t) +

  28. Note that dffr still depends on both shocks • dffr(t) = (b2 a1 + a2)/(1- b1 b2) +[(b2 g11+ g21)/(1- b1 b2)] dcapu(t-1) + [ (b2 g12+ g22)/(1- b1 b2)] dffr(t-1) + [(b2 d1+ d2 )/(1- b1 b2)] x(t) + (b2edcapu(t) + edffr(t))/(1- b1 b2) • dffr(t) = (b2 a1 + a2)+[(b2 g11+ g21) dcapu(t-1) + (b2 g12+ g22) dffr(t-1) + (b2 d1+ d2 ) x(t) + (b2edcapu(t) + edffr(t))

  29. Reality edcapu(t) DCAPU shock DFFR edffr(t)

  30. What If edcapu(t) DCAPU shock DFFR edffr(t)

  31. EVIEWS

  32. Interpretations • Response of dcapu to a shock in dcapu • immediate and positive: autoregressive nature • Response of dffr to a shock in dffr • immediate and positive: autoregressive nature • Response of dcapu to a shock in dffr • starts at zero by assumption that b1 =0, • interpret as Fed having no impact on CAPU • Response of dffr to a shock in dcapu • positive and then damps out • interpret as Fed raising FFR if CAPU rises

  33. Change the Assumption Around

  34. What If edcapu(t) DCAPU shock DFFR edffr(t)

  35. Standard VAR • dffr(t) = (b2 a1 + a2)/(1- b1 b2) +[(b2 g11+ g21)/(1- b1 b2)] dcapu(t-1) + [ (b2 g12+ g22)/(1- b1 b2)] dffr(t-1) + [(b2 d1+ d2 )/(1- b1 b2)] x(t) + (b2edcapu(t) + edffr(t))/(1- b1 b2) • if b2 = 0 • then, dffr(t) = a2 + g21 dcapu(t-1) + g22 dffr(t-1) + d2 x(t) + edffr(t)) • but, dcapu(t) = (a1 + b1 a2) + (g11+ b1 g21) dcapu(t-1) + [ (g12+ b1 g22) dffr(t-1) + [(d1+ b1 d2 ) x(t) + (edcapu(t) + b1 edffr(t))

  36. Interpretations • Response of dcapu to a shock in dcapu • immediate and positive: autoregressive nature • Response of dffr to a shock in dffr • immediate and positive: autoregressive nature • Response of dcapu to a shock in dffr • is positive (not - ) initially but then damps to zero • interpret as Fed having no or little control of CAPU • Response of dffr to a shock in dcapu • starts at zero by assumption that b2 =0, • interpret as Fed raising FFR if CAPU rises

  37. Conclusions • We come to the same model interpretation and policy conclusions no matter what the ordering, i.e. no matter which assumption we use, b1 =0, or b2 =0. • So, accept the analysis

  38. Understanding through Simulation • We can not get back to the primitive fron the standard VAR, so we might as well simplify notation • y(t) = (a1 + b1 a2)/(1- b1 b2) +[ (g11+ b1 g21)/(1- b1 b2)] y(t-1) + [ (g12+ b1 g22)/(1- b1 b2)] w(t-1) + [(d1+ b1 d2 )/(1- b1 b2)] x(t) + (edcapu(t) + b1 edffr(t))/(1- b1 b2) • becomes y(t) = a1 + b11 y(t-1) + c11 w(t-1) + d1 x(t) + e1(t)

  39. And w(t) = (b2 a1 + a2)/(1- b1 b2) +[(b2 g11+ g21)/(1- b1 b2)] y(t-1) + [ (b2 g12+ g22)/(1- b1 b2)] w(t-1) + [(b2 d1+ d2 )/(1- b1 b2)] x(t) + (b2edcapu(t) + edffr(t))/(1- b1 b2) • becomes w(t) = a2 + b21 y(t-1) + c21 w(t-1) + d2 x(t) + e2(t)

More Related