270 likes | 409 Vues
Spurious Relationship. A correlation between two variables that have no causal relationship; both variables are caused by another variable. Example: Water causes drunkenness. . Once a group of students decided to study empirically the causes of drunkenness.
E N D
Spurious Relationship A correlation between two variables that have no causal relationship; both variables are caused by another variable
Example: Water causes drunkenness. • Once a group of students decided to study empirically the causes of drunkenness. • They drank vodka and water. Got drunk. • They drank rum and water. Got drunk. • They drank scotch and water. Got drunk. • They drank bourbon and water. Got drunk. • They drank gin and water. Got drunk. • Conclusion: Water causes drunkenness
Examples of spurious relationships • Amount of ice cream sold and death by drowning (units are months) • Number of doctors and number of people dying of disease (by city) • Number of churches and number of homicides (by city) • Number of libraries and number of people on drugs (over time)
What causes the price of rum? • There is a positive relationship between the salaries of Presbyterian ministers in Massachusetts and the price of rum in Havana. • What is the causal mechanism?
Causal Mechanism? International business conditions: prices and salaries increasing everywhere Ministers’ salaries Price of rum
Popular Study: Smoking causes bad grades • True or spurious? • What could be the variable (or variables) that drive both?
News reports • Bottled water causes healthier babies • Drinking tea makes you less likely to contract lung cancer
Research question: Does education cause political tolerance? • Many scholars have found a positive relationship between political tolerance (support for liberty for political enemies) and education. • Causal mechanism? • As people are educated, they are introduced to different kinds of people and perceived danger of political enemies decreases. • As people are educated, they are socialized to the correctness of constitutional rights.
Alternative Explanation • Political tolerance is actually caused by cognitive sophistication, as measured by IQ. • Causal mechanism? • It is difficult to reconcile the emotional reaction to named political enemies (i.e. Nazis) with constitutional rights and it takes a high IQ to understand that democracy benefits from giving liberties to “bad people.”
Relationship between Education and Political Tolerance High Political Tolerance Medium Low Low Medium High Education
Probability • The probability of an outcome … • is the frequency of that outcome • if the process were repeated a large number of times… • under similar conditions
Relationship between Education and Political Tolerance High Political Tolerance Medium Low Low Medium High Education
What is the probability of… • High political tolerance, given low levels of education? • Low political tolerance, given medium levels of education? • High political tolerance, given high levels of education? • Low political tolerance, given low levels of education?
Controlling for IQ • X = high IQ • Y = low IQ
Education and Political Tolerance High Political Tolerance Medium Low Low Medium High Education
Education and Political Tolerance - High IQ High Political Tolerance Medium Low Low Medium High Education
Education and Political Tolerance - High IQ High Political Tolerance Medium Low Low Medium High Education
Education and Political Tolerance - Low IQ High Political Tolerance Medium Low Low Medium High Education
Education and Political Tolerance - Low IQ High Political Tolerance Medium Low Low Medium High Education
Conclusion? • What was the hypothesis? • What was the alternative explanation? • What do we conclude about the likely cause of political tolerance?
Review • A spurious effect is a specific case when correlation is not causation. • The specific case is related to whether the two things correlated are caused by a third variable.
An illustration with a causal model A and B are spuriously correlated if: Z B A
A test of whether A and B are spurious • Look at the relationship between A and B, controlling for Z • This means, that for all values of Z, you should look at the relationship between A and B.
Crosstab analysis testing for spurious relationships, part I (z = 1 or 2)
Crosstab analysis testing for spurious relationships, part 2 (z = 1)
Crosstab analysis testing for spurious relationships, part 3 (z = 2)
Scatterplot illustration of a spurious relationship Z = 1 or 2 A Z = 1 B Z = 2 A A B B