1 / 13

United States Joint Forces Command Joint Concept Development and Experimentation (JCD&E) Tidewater Association of Se

United States Joint Forces Command Joint Concept Development and Experimentation (JCD&E) Tidewater Association of Service Contractors (TASC).

yoland
Télécharger la présentation

United States Joint Forces Command Joint Concept Development and Experimentation (JCD&E) Tidewater Association of Se

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. United States Joint Forces Command Joint Concept Development and Experimentation (JCD&E) Tidewater Association of Service Contractors (TASC) Distribution:For Official Use Only – Not Approved for Public ReleaseAdministrative/Operational Use – 14 November 2008Other requests for this document shall be referred to:Joint Concept Development and ExperimentationU.S. Joint Forces Command115 Lake View ParkwaySuffolk, VA 23435-2697 Attn: Mr. Kelly Mayes, Phone: 757-203-3191 [Name] [Title] Joint Concept Development & Experimentation USJFCOM, J9 1

  2. Joint Experimentation Evolution Addressing operators needs Problem Set: Restoring Stability Problem Set: Irregular Warfare OIF OEF Problem Set: Major Combat Operations • JCDE “Enterprise” approach • In-theater experimentation • Reach-back – reach-out • Practical solutions • Increased use of focused events 2009 MNF-I support CSE MNE-5 ISAF support 2008 • Distributed Environment • Expanding Interagency and Multinational participation • Advanced M+S • Integrated Joint and Service Experiments 2007 Noble Resolve Urban Resolve MNE-4 2006 2005 • Building Partnerships • Establishing Joint Context • Fielding Prototype Solutions 2004 Unified Quest Unified Course Unified Engagement Joint Urban Warrior 2003 • Evolving Mission • Team Building • Identifying Required Authorities 2002 2001 Millennium Challenge 2000 1999 1998 Birth of JFCOM Joint Concept Development & Experimentation

  3. ExperimentVs.Exercise Experiment Exercise • Explores NEW WAYS OF OPERATING • Often employs M&S as primary tool • Develops emerging capabilities definition while applying new technologies • Establishes discovery environment • Stimulates creation of new tactics, techniques and procedures • Examines EXISTING WAYS OF OPERATING to improve readiness • Typically live forces centric with simulation support • Training & education focused • Reinforces established processes, procedures, benchmarks • Facilitates warfighter certifications

  4. Focusing on DoD’s Biggest Challenges

  5. Joint Concept Development and Experimentation Problem Statement The Department of Defense requires the ability to focus and synchronize experimentation efforts to ensure the most important security challenges, now and in the future, are being addressed while ensuring a focus on customers; a focus on outcomes and a return on investment Experimentation Design conduct and enable comprehensive, innovative and objective joint experimentation to examine validity of concepts and capabilities to satisfy needs of the Joint Force Commander. • Concepts • Innovative • Intellectually Rigorous • Clearly Written • Concise and • Defendable • Capabilities • Define • Experiment • Transition • For the future Joint Force Commander Enterprise Approach Collaboratively and transparently lead JCDE Enterprise efforts to synchronize concept, capability and experimentation efforts across the Department of Defense.

  6. Addressing Strategic Priorities Shaping Countries at Strategic Crossroads (15) • Guidance for Development of the Force • Established guidance of focus for DOD joint experimentation • Defeat Terrorist Networks • Combating WMD • Shaping countries at the crossroads • Defending the homeland • Directed balance in JCD&E portfolio • Near, Mid, & Far-Term • Strategic, operational & tactical levels Preventing WMD Acquisition or Use (8) Defending the Homeland in Depth (9) Defeating TerroristNetworks (24) GDF Focus Areas(Number of Projects) Temporal Balance

  7. FY09 Summary: Defeating Terrorist Networks (IW) • Problem: The Joint Force Commander requires the ability to dissuade, deter, and defeat irregular adversaries who are adaptive and networked. • Key outcomes/deliverables • Support SOCOM & USMC for IW JICs (COIN, UW, DTN, FID) & CBAs • Wargame Hybrid Threat (IDF) and Phase 0 CT solutions • Synchronize coalition IW • Evaluate IW small-unit training, personnel suppression and urban recon capabilities • Identify/refine C2/DA processes, tools and architectures to support and synchronize IW • Develop offensive and defensive cyber ops capabilities • Enable distributed ops through decentralized and resilient C2 for fires and maneuver • Develop rules, tools and processes to support/enable whole-of-government approach • Identify/refine requirements for IA/MN sharing of decision-quality info • FY09 Projects • Irregular Warfare Concepts Support (IWC SPT) • Support to SOCOM IW Experimentation (SOCOM Spt) • Multinational Experiment 6 (MNE6) • Counter-Personnel Warning and Suppression Systems (CPWSS) • Enhanced Urban Reconnaissance (EUR) • Small Unit Decision Making LOE (SUDM LOE) • IWC/Joint Urban Operations S&T (IWC/JUO S&T) • IWC/Joint Urban Operations CBA (IWC/JUO CBA) • IWC/Joint Urban Operations M&S (IWC/JUO M&S) • “Hybrid Threat” Experimentation w/IDF (IDF Exp) • Joint Urban Warrior (JUW) • Joint Force Commander Command & Control (JFC C2) • Joint Force Commander Domain Awareness (JFC DA) • Joint Integrated Persistent Surveillance (JIPS) • Cyberspace Operations (CYBEROPS) • Joint Distributed Operations (JDO) • Cooperative Security (CS) Experimentation • Deployable Security Sector Reform (DSSR) • Unified Action 09 (UA09) • Interagency Shared Common Operational Picture (IACOP) • Strategic Communication (SC) Experimentation • Stability Operations JOC (STAB OPS JOC) • Geospatial Analysis and Planning Support (GAPS)

  8. FY09 Summary: Preventing WMD • Problem: The Joint Force Commander requires the ability to prevent the spread of weapons of mass destruction; detect, track, interdict, and eliminate these weapons and their delivery systems, and coordinate consequence management activities in support of civil authorities in case of attack. • Key outcomes/deliverables • Develop a systems approach to detection, characterization, interdiction and disablement of RN and BIO threats • Identify near- and mid-term capabilities and recommend technologies for acceleration to fill CWMD gaps • Identify/refine C2/DA processes, tools and architectures to support CWMD ops • Streamline tipping, cueing and communications to optimize effectiveness of surveillance ops • Develop processes, tools and architectures to improve CI/HUMINT integration • Develop TTP’s for recognizing and operating in a denied/degraded GPS environment • FY09 Projects • Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction – Radiological & Nuclear (CWMD RN) • Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction – Biological (CWMD Bio) • Joint Force Commander Domain Awareness (JFC DA) • Joint Force Commander Command & Control (JFC C2) • Joint Integrated Persistent Surveillance (JIPS) • Joint Distributed Operations (JDO) • Joint Counterintelligence/Human Intelligence Integration (JCHI2) • Global Positioning System (GPS) Sustainability

  9. FY09 Summary: Shaping Countries at Strategic Crossroads • Problem: The Joint Force Commander must be able to affect the perceptions, will, behavior, and capabilities of partner, competitor, or adversary leaders, military forces, and relevant populations to further U.S. national security or shared global security interests. • Key outcomes/deliverables • Examine adequacy and supportability of CCJO • Identify/refine C2/DA processes, tools and architectures to support joint ops • Define & integrate offensive/defensive cyber ops capabilities • Define capability gaps & requirements for air access against advanced/hybrid threats • Revise Conventional Warfare Concept • Define capabilities required for Seabasing • Develop TTPs for recognizing and operating in a denied/degraded GPS environment • Improve ability to plan, integrate, and conduct SC activities with USG and coalition partners • Identify/refine requirements for IA/MN sharing of decision-quality info • FY09 Projects • Capstone Concept for Joint Operations (CCJO) Experimentation • Joint Force Commander Command & Control (JFC C2) • Joint Force Commander Domain Awareness (JFC DA) • Joint Integrated Persistent Surveillance (JIPS) • Cyber Operations (CYBEROPS) • Assured Air Access (AAA) • Conventional Warfare Joint Operating Concept (CW JOC) • Irregular Warfare Concepts Support (IWC SPT) • Seabasing • Global Positioning System (GPS) Sustainability • Cooperative Security (CS) Experimentation • Strategic Communication (SC) Experimentation • Interagency Shared Common Operational Picture (IACOP) • Joint Distributed Operations (JDO)

  10. FY09 Summary: Defending the Homeland • Problem: The Joint Force Commander requires the ability to protect United States sovereignty, territory, domestic population, and critical infrastructure against external threats and aggression, natural disasters or other threats. • Key outcomes/deliverables • Develop requirements and processes for integration of national missile defense assets • Identify/refine C2/DA processes, tools and architectures to support joint ops • Define & integrate offensive/defensive cyber ops capabilities • Identify/refine requirements for IA/MN sharing of decision-quality info • Improve ability to plan, integrate, and conduct SC activities with USG and coalition partners • Develop rules, tools and processes to support/enable whole-of-government approach • FY09 Projects • Global Integrated Air and Missile Defense (GMD) • Joint Force Commander Command & Control (JFC C2) • Joint Force Commander Domain Awareness (JFC DA) • Joint Integrated Persistent Surveillance (JIPS) • Interagency Common Operational Picture (IA COP) • Cyberspace Operations (CYBEROPS) • Strategic Communication (SC) Experimentation • Unified Action 09 (UA09)

  11. FY09 Summary: Other • Logistics Projects • USCENTCOM Joint Logistics Transformation: Build a Joint logistics construct designed around a Service-based organization that will coordinate, integrate, and synchronize theater logistics. • Multinational Experiment 6 Logistics: Deliver interoperability standards for multinational users of the beta NATO Logistics Functional Services (LOG FS) systems, to better facilitate information sharing. • USSOUTHCOM Joint Interagency Security Command: Provide solutions that enable military deployment and logistics processes to support interagency led operations. • USSOCOM Joint Special Operations Warfighting Capability: Integrate Geographic Combatant Command’s (GCC) Theater Special Operations Command (TSOC) requirements with General Purpose forces logistics at the operational level when deployed into the GCC AOR. • KORCOM Provide a joint logistics construct for Korean theater of operations to enable transition to a supporting (US)/supported (ROK) command relationship • Armed Private Security Contractors (JFCOM CoS Task J00-0154U-08) • Integrate and deconflict APSC activities with joint force operations • Planning Assessment and Decision Support System (Formerly TEBO - ACTD in transition) • Complete MUA and transition • Title Ten • Unified Quest • Unified Engagement • Trident Warrior • Global Game 09 • Joint Urban Warrior 09 • Expeditionary Warrior 09

  12. Initial Look at FY-10 • Logistics consultancy moves to J3/4 • Joint Urban Operations Office aligned to Irregular Warfare Center • Continuing focus on War Fighter Challenges – in definition • Small amount of FY-08 project close out • Irregular Warfare as a core competency • Minimal to no capability development (hardware/software) • New administration priorities

More Related