1 / 14

The WHIM In Leiden

The WHIM In Leiden. Joop Schaye. Can we find the missing baryons?. Most of the WHIM (10^5-10^7 K) is only moderately overdense Most of the WHIM is metal-poor Metallicity is highly stochastic. Studies using metal emission and (less so) absorption will give a highly biased view.

yolanda-russell
Télécharger la présentation

The WHIM In Leiden

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The WHIM In Leiden Joop Schaye

  2. Can we find the missing baryons? • Most of the WHIM (10^5-10^7 K) is only moderately overdense • Most of the WHIM is metal-poor • Metallicity is highly stochastic Studies using metal emission and (less so) absorption will give a highly biased view.

  3. Can we find the missing baryons? • Using metal lines, it is impossible to measure Ω(WHIM) more precisely than the metal distribution • Measurements of Ω(WHIM) are only interesting if the errors are smaller than a factor 2 • Simulations can predict Ω(WHIM) to within a factor 2, but not the metal distribution • Turn the problem around! • Analogy: Ω(baryon) at z=3 from the Lyα-forest

  4. What can we learn from the WHIM? • Astrophysics rather than cosmology: • Metal distribution • Cooling in clusters and around galaxies • Feedback from galaxies • Strategies: • Look around galaxies (stack!) rather than blank fields • Need decent angular resolution

  5. But can we really predict Ω(WHIM) ? • Heating and cooling depend on simulation dynamic range • Cooling depends on metallicity • Cooling depends on relatitve abundances • Cooling depends on UV radiation

  6. Collisional Ionization Equilibrium

  7. Photoionization Equilibrium

  8. But can we really predict Ω(WHIM) ? • Have a very large dynamic range • Include chemodynamics • Compute cooling element-by-element • Include photo-ionization of all elements We need cosmological hydro simulations that:

  9. OWLS:OverWhelmingly Large Simulations 10 M CPU hours awarded

  10. The software: Gadget II (SPH) + Chemodynamics (AGB, SNe Ia and II, 11 elements) + Cooling by element and incl. photoionization + New subgrid SF + New wind model + Quasar feedback

  11. The simulations • Cosmological, Hydro (radiative transfer under development) • 2xN3, N up to ~1000, most ~500 • Many runs with varying physics • Aim to “resolve” all galaxies that cool via atoms • Aim to resolve Jeans scale at SF threshold

  12. The science • Nearly everything (on scales 1 kpc < L < 100 Mpc) Strengths: Hydro, abundances, cooling • Examples: • Feedback processes and galaxy formation • WHIM • Clusters

  13. The OWLS people • Leiden: Schaye (PI), Dalla Vecchia, Haas, Wiersma • MPA: Springel • Durham: Theuns • SISSA: Tornatore And: The VIRGO collaboration for zoomed simulations

More Related