260 likes | 383 Vues
This overview details the structure of the U.S. federal court system, differentiating between state and federal courts, and establishing their respective jurisdictions. It discusses the concept of standing to sue and the role of grand juries in deciding indictments. The process of selecting federal judges is examined, highlighting the influence of political ideology, judicial behavior, and senatorial courtesy, as well as the lengthy appointment process influenced by party dynamics. The complexities of case selection, the Supreme Court's jurisdiction, and judicial opinions are also explored.
E N D
Judicial Branch #1 The Federal Court System
Dual Court System State Courts: have jurisdiction over the majority of cases Federal Courts: have jurisdiction in certain areas
Standing to Sue There must be a real controversy between adversaries. Personal harm must be demonstrated. Grand Juries will decide if there is enough evidence to go to trial (indictment) Plaintiff Defendant
Article III – Federal Courts • No formal qualifications • Serve on “good behavior”– life terms • Appointed by the • Confirmed by the • Can be impeached & removed • Congress determines size & structure of federal courts
Selecting Judges • Presidents seek judicial appointees who share their political ideologies. • R president picks conservative judge by looking at previous rulings • May use “litmus test” on issues such as abortion
Selecting Judges • Party background has a strong effect on judicial behavior. • Can judges ever be neutral? • Senatorial Courtesy: Senators from state where judge is needed will recommend/review Pres’ pick for lower courts
In the S • Appointees face Judiciary Cmte • Cmte will “interview” appointee • Appointee will NOT answer direct questions on topics that may come up when they are a judge
Full Senate • Give “advice and consent” • Do they confirm those who are qualified but have a different ideology? • These votes are often filibustered! • B/c S doesn’t want to vote on issue (they’d like to vote no – but don’t have enough votes to win) these positions often face long delays before getting job
#1, continued … • Why do you think the Framers created a life term for federal judges? • Why aren’t federal judges elected by the people?
Jud #2: Court Structure • How does one become a federal judge? • How long is one term as a federal judge? • Why is picking a federal judge one of the president’s most important jobs
Pottawatomie Independent School District v. Earls (2002) • This school district adopted a policy of mandatory, suspicionless drug testing of high school students participating in any school activity. Students who refused could not participate. • Lindsay Earls a member of the choir challenged this saying it violated the 4th amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches & seizures. • Who’s right? The school or the student?
3 Levels of Federal Cts • District Courts: the entry point for most litigation in federal courts, trial courts • Original jurisdiction – first authority to hear case • 91 District Courts
Circuit Court of Appeals: reviews final decisions of district courts • Appellate jurisdiction – authority to hear an appeal • 12 Circuits • Makes most final decisions 3. Supreme Court: “last stop!”
Supreme Court • 9 Justices • Includes Chief Justice • Judicial Review: is a law constitutional? • From what court case? • Makes the final review on a case
Jurisdiction • Original Jurisdiction: hear case for the 1st time: • Foreign dignitaries (ambassador, etc) • Cases that involve 2 states • Appellate Jurisdiction: hear case on an appeal(Majority of cases) • Constitutional / Federal law • Treaties • Maritime
Selecting a Case • Control their docket • Rule of 4 • 4 justices must decide to hear a case • If they do, it’s given a writ of certiorari(an order for lower ct to send up case for their review) • Most cases will not get heard • Stare Decesis: “Let the decision stand”
Which cases are heard by the SC? • Major/Constitutional issue • Confusion in lower courts
Deciding a Case • Lawyers submit briefs: • Legal documents from both sides • Amicus curiae from IG’s • SC reviews materials
Oral Arguments • Oral Arguments: Each side’s lawyers present to justices publicly • Time limits • Questions & comments from the justices • Solicitor General: US lawyer in SC • Review materials already given to Court
Judicial Power • Judicial Conference: justices discuss the case behind closed doors • Chief Justice presides • Decision: number of people who agree • Ex: 7-2 where 7 justices say no and 2 say yes
Explanation • Opinion: brief that explains the decision • Majority Opinion: explains opinion of the majority • Concurring Opinion: agrees w/majority for different reasons • Dissenting Opinion: explains opinion of the minority • Decision is made public
What if you don’t like their decision? • How to overturn a SC ruling: • The SC issues a new ruling • Possibly re-write law / statute to meet SC’s standards • Constitutional amendment • This gives them a lot of power!!!
Buroc FRQ • Exp 2 reasons why Cong gives federal agencies policy making discretion in executing federal laws. • Choose 1 agency & identify policy area….AND 1 example of how it exercises policy making discretion • Describe 2 ways in which Cong ensures they follow legislative intent