1 / 24

The Vocational Training System in the United States

The Vocational Training System in the United States. Thomas Bailey Community College Research Center Teachers College, Columbia University And Peter Berg School of Labor and Industrial Relations Michigan State University. Outline.

yuri
Télécharger la présentation

The Vocational Training System in the United States

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Vocational Training System in the United States Thomas Bailey Community College Research Center Teachers College, Columbia University And Peter Berg School of Labor and Industrial Relations Michigan State University

  2. Outline • Structure of the post secondary education system in the United States • Characteristics of the vocational education student population • Connection of vocational education to the labor market • Weakening distinction between general and vocational education • Issues in vocational education

  3. Structure of Post Secondary (PS) Educational Options High School Academic/Vocational 4-Year Univ. Public 4-Year Univ. Private 2-Year Com. Coll. Public 4-Year Univ. Public 2-Year Trade School, for profit 2-Year Com. Coll. Public 4-Year College, for profit 4-Year College, for profit Apprenticeship Non-Credit instruction

  4. Providers of Non-Credit Job-Related Education (1999) Source: NHES99

  5. Fall Headcount: 1970 to 2000 7,000,000 Public four-year 6,000,000 5,000,000 Public two-year 4,000,000 Private four-year 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 Private two-year 0 1970- 1972- 1974- 1976- 1978- 1980- 1982- 1984- 1986- 1988- 1990- 1992- 1994- 1996- 1998- 2000- 71 73 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 Source: U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Digest of Education Statistics.

  6. To Which Field of Study? Source: BPS89.

  7. Current Fund Expenditures (per student, 1995-96) Source: U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Digest of Education Statistics.

  8. Tuition (2001-2002)

  9. States with the Largest and Smallest Two-Year Enrollment (Fall 2000) Five states with most CC students Public Ratio of two-year Four-year Two-year to four-year 1) California 551,871 1,375,900 2.49 2) Texas 436,530 460,004 1.05 3) Illinois 193,783 340,372 1.76 4) Florida 238,189 318,723 1.34 5) New York 336,003 247,414 0.74 Five states with fewest CC students Public Ratio of two-year Four-year Two-year to four-year 46) West Virginia 69,967 6,169 0.09 47) Montana 32,059 5,328 0.17 48) South Dakota 29,882 4,975 0.17 49) Vermont 15,609 4,412 0.28 50) Alaska 25,396 1,163 0.05 Source: U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Digest of Education Statistics.

  10. Summary • CCs account for 40-50 percent of PS enrollments • CCs have much lower costs and much lower tuition • The majority of students in community colleges are in occupational programs • Structure of PS sector varies by state

  11. Characteristics of the Vocational Education Student Population

  12. High School Completion and Initial Postsecondary EnrollmentEighth Graders in 1988

  13. High School Completion and Initial Postsecondary Education by SES QuartileEighth Graders in 1988

  14. Community Colleges and AccessCompared to Students in BA Programs

  15. Connection of Vocational Education to the Labor Market • Weak relationship between specific educational credentials and specific jobs. • Employers involved in designing curricula at community colleges. Many courses taught by past practitioners. Employers serve on community college advisory boards. • Labor Union involvement varies by state. More involvement where unions are strong. • Varied economic value to vocational education

  16. Economic Outcomes by Degree Source: NELS.

  17. Economic Value of a Community College Education • Benefits of an Associate Degree (compared to a HS degree) • Men earn 15 to 30 percent more • Women earn up to 50 percent more • Certificates • Positive for women • Uncertain for men • Earnings benefit of an associate degree is at least half of the benefit of a BA

  18. Summary of Economic Value • AAs and BAs have economic value • CC education, on a per year or per course basis, has as high a payoff as BA education (at least so far) • Certificates have uncertain value and rarely serve as lower rungs of educational ladders • Education without degrees has value, but degrees have more value

  19. Blurring of the Lines between Vocational and General Education • Traditionally, distinction made by type of degree, not preparing students for work. • Many occupational degrees have counterparts in general education system. • Nursing, IT, engineering, accounting • 4-Year universities are increasingly occupational. • BA’s in business, education, health

  20. Blurring of the Lines between Vocational and General Education • Efforts to increase transfers to general education have met with limited success • Non-credit instruction (further training) occurring across all post-secondary institutions.

  21. Issues in Vocational Education • Transferability and achieving a degree or certification • Equity

  22. CC First PSE Students in Various GroupsPercent Distribution by Highest Outcome in All PSE within Eight Years (NELS)

  23. Equity • CC education has value, especially if students earn degrees • Many still don’t have access even to CCs • Many, almost a majority, do not earn any degrees • Access and success are both highly related to income.

  24. Conclusion • Vocational Education System is undergoing change • Rising education requirements • Increasing academic content of vocational work • More non-traditional pathways through college • Concerns about equity and opportunity • Distinctions between vocational education and general education, between initial and further training are becoming blurred. • Efforts to build a system to prepare students for work and subsequent education are far from realized • Race and class still matter

More Related