1 / 18

Libel

Libel. What reporters need to know. Libel is a “tort”. A tort is not a dessert. It is a wrong done to another person for which there is a remedy in civil -- not criminal -- law. Examples of torts: Breach of contract, invasion of privacy, denial of civil rights.

yvonne
Télécharger la présentation

Libel

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Libel What reporters need to know

  2. Libel is a “tort” • A tort is not a dessert. • It is a wrong done to another person for which there is a remedy in civil -- not criminal -- law. • Examples of torts: Breach of contract, invasion of privacy, denial of civil rights. • Examples of crimes: Murder, assault. • Some wrongs can be both civil and criminal -- i.e. Nicole and O.J.

  3. Torts • Not punishable by incarceration or fine • Punishable only with “damages” • Actual damages are money lost, pain and suffering, court costs, lawyers’ fees • Punitive damages -- meant to sting so that the tort is not committed again.

  4. The Elements of Libel • Published false defamation of an identifiable living person with fault. • Note: Businesses and corporations may also file libel suits, but do so less frequently than individuals.

  5. Publication • A statement must be “published” to be libelous. • “Published” means communicated to any third person by any means, written or spoken.

  6. Falsity • At one time, truthful libels were punished more severely than false libels. • Now, however, truth is a perfect defense against a charge of libel.

  7. Defamation • A statement about a person that tends to injure his or her standing or reputation in the community. • For example: Claims of dishonesty, moral turpitude, drunkenness, addiction. • Not all defamation is libelous -- because some defamation is true.

  8. Identification • To successfully sue, a person must be identifiable. • Not necessarily identified by name. • Members of large groups generally can’t be libeled • Members of small groups can be.

  9. Living person • The dead can’t be libeled. A libel case will be dismissed on the death of the plaintiff. • Governments can’t be libeled.

  10. Fault • Fault means the defendant did something wrong • Was negligent -- failed to exercise the care a responsible reporter would exercise • Was grossly negligent -- failed even worse • Committed “actual malice” -- published a defamatory falsehood knowing it was false, or with reckless disregard of its truth or falsity.

  11. Recap • For a statement to be libelous, it must be • Published • False • Defamation • Of identifiable • Living person • With fault

  12. Two kinds of libel law • Common law • “Judge-made” law, based on precedent built up in cases over the years. • Constitutional law • Based on U.S. Constitution • Applicable to libel after Times v Sullivan decision in 1964

  13. Common law libel • To bring a charge of libel, only three elements were needed -- publication, defamation, identification. • “No-fault” libel -- the presence of the statement in the story was enough, even if it was an honest mistake.

  14. Common law defenses • Truth -- basically, accuracy • Fair comment -- opinion, but on an accurate factual basis. • Privilege -- a fair and accurate account of a public proceeding • Note: All of these depend on accuracy -- no protection for erroneous statement.

  15. Times v. Sullivan • Landmark Supreme Court decision • No more “no-fault” libel • Switched burden of proof of falsity from defendant to plaintiff • Said public officials had to prove actual malice

  16. Rationale for decision • Public officials enjoy “privilege” of open comment • The people are the real government • They should be privileged to criticize public officials • Common law libel chills robust and vigorous public debate

  17. Fallout from Times v Sullivan • Standards later extended from public officials to include public figures • Those who seek the limelight or thrust themselves voluntarily into the public arena • Even private citizens must prove some standard of fault to prevail -- at least negligence

  18. Recap: Since Times v Sullivan • To prevail in a libel action • Public officials • And public figures • Must prove not only publication, defamation and identification • But also falsity and actual malice.

More Related