1 / 16

Bridging the Gap Between Research and Policy: Insights from Civil Society Partnerships

This presentation by Ajoy Datta at the Civil Society Partnerships Programme emphasizes the critical link between research and policy-making. It discusses whether a gap exists, explores implications for research centers, and provides strategies to effectively promote research to policymakers. Focusing on different global contexts, such as East Asia and Latin America, the presentation highlights the role of think tanks and other actors in influencing policy while underscoring the need for context-aware approaches, stakeholder analysis, and strategic partnerships to enhance the uptake of research.

zagiri
Télécharger la présentation

Bridging the Gap Between Research and Policy: Insights from Civil Society Partnerships

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Civil Society Partnerships Programme Bridging the gap between research and policy making?Ajoy DattaFoundation for the Future, Dead Sea, Jordan 26-28 January 2010

  2. Outline of this presentation • Is there a gap? No, not really • What are the implications for research centres? • How can we promote our own research

  3. Is there a gap? Policy Research

  4. Is there a gap? Research Policy

  5. Is there a gap? • Focus has been on researchers and links to policymakers and policy • Policy is broadly linked to evidence • The issue of knowledge density • Research centres are political actors

  6. Many links exist • Formal internal think tanks • Public think tanks • UN think tanks • Informal ‘internal’ think tanks

  7. Research and policy in East Asia • States and Markets have been politically contested • Think thanks are an important actor • They are political • They are part of a long term national development plan

  8. Research and policy in Latin America • Emergence of think tanks tightly linked to historical development of region • Coincided with political struggles • Eclectic funding sources • Political parties • International NGOs/foundations • Private sector

  9. Is there a gap? Technocratic networks Universities Research Political parties Ideological think tanks NGOs Internal think tanks Regulatory bodies UN Think tanks Lobbies Policy Public think tanks Executive corporations

  10. In the United States • Industrial revolution donors: progressive believe in science • Post Wall Street Crash: contain social disaffection • Second World War: more complex foreign policy and military strategies • Cold War: beat the Russians (and all that implies) • The conservative swing: Get the Republicans into the White House Philanthropy/ Academia Philanthropy/ Policy Ideology Politics

  11. Conclusion • One community • But with differences • Extent of overlap can vary • Context dependent • Little or no gap • Not everyone can be influential • Aligned with political interests

  12. Implications • Really understand the context. What works where? • Recognise the limits to the uptake of some research by policymakers • Uptake is not same everywhere • Work with what you have • Depends on who you are

  13. Promoting your research • Know your policy objective • Understand the context • Identify who you want to influence • Clarify what changes you want • Develop a theory of change • Develop a strategy • Develop your competencies and skills and/or partner with others • Set up a Monitoring and Learning system

  14. For example: • RAPID Framework • Drivers of Change • Power Analysis • SWOT • Influence Mapping • Force Field Analysis • For example: • AIIM • Stakeholder analysis • Influence Mapping • Social Network Analysis • Force Field Analysis Start by defining your policy objectives – constantly review them during the process • For example: • Progress Markers • Opportunities and Threats timeline • Policy Objectives • AIIM • Force Field Analysis • For example: • Log Frame (flexible) • Outcome Mapping • Journals or impact logs • Internal monitoring tools • For example: • Force Field Analysis • For example: • Policy entrepreneur questionnaire • SWOT • Internal performance frameworks • For example: • Publications, public relations • Media and events • Negotiation and advice • Develop a network or coalition • Research

  15. RAPID OUTCOME MAPPING APPROACH (ROMA) More research Develop a network or build partnerships Capacity building Research communications

  16. Thank you Ajoy Datta a.datta@odi.org.uk www.odi.org.uk/rapid www.ebpdn.org

More Related