1 / 31

Investigating heavy quark energy loss with lepton-tagged jets

Investigating heavy quark energy loss with lepton-tagged jets. Jennifer Klay California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo. Theoretical Motivation. Transport coefficient. Strong coupling. Casimir factor. Medium size.

zanthe
Télécharger la présentation

Investigating heavy quark energy loss with lepton-tagged jets

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Investigating heavy quark energy loss with lepton-tagged jets Jennifer Klay California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo

  2. Theoretical Motivation Transport coefficient Strong coupling Casimir factor Medium size Quarks (CR=4/3) vs. Gluons (CR=3)  colour charge dependence Gluon(g): self-interacting mediator of strong force Light quark(q): up, down, strange m ~ 300 MeV «Dead-cone» effect for θ0 < mQ/EQ  mass dependence Heavy quark(Q): charm, bottom m ~1-5 GeV Y.L.Dokshitzer and D.E. Kharzeev, Physics Letters B519, 199 (2001) ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  3. Experimental Landscape STAR, Phys Rev Lett 91, 072304 Di-hadron suppression Photon vs. Hadron suppression Non-photonic electron suppression similar to light hadrons ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  4. Heavy Quark Production in PYTHIA Pair Creation Leading Order: Back-to-back in azimuth (gluon in (c) causes kinematic shift but cross-sections determined by LO 2 2) Flavour Excitation Scattering of Q(Q) out of initial state into final state by gluon or light quark (Virtuality of hard scatter must be > mQ2) E. Norrbin & T. Sjostrand, Eur. Phys. J. C17, 137 (2000) Gluon Splitting No QQ in hard-scatter, but pair created within parton shower or during the fragmentation process of a gluon or a light quark QCD Process classification: 2, 1, or 0 heavy flavours in hard-scattering final state ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  5. b-Jet Kinematics in PYTHIA E. Norrbin & T. Sjostrand, Eur. Phys. J. C17, 137 (2000) Normalized to unit area for shape comparison Leading order pairs come out back-to-back  pT Similar results in HERWIG, ISAJET See R.D. Field, Phys. Rev. D65 (2002) 094006 hep-ph/0201112 ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  6. Lin and Vogt, Nucl.Phys. B544 (1999) 339-354 bB- (38%), B0 (38%), B0s (11%), Λ0b(13%) BlX, BDXlY Bl- (9.30%), BDXl-Y(2.07%) Bl+(1.25%), BDXl+Y(7.36%) bb->dilepton 0.020/event Bl1Xl1l2Y 0.018/event How to find them? Semi-leptonic decay channel provides the signal sources to look for… Find the jet with a B through the e,μ decay and you have your parton… • Backgrounds: • Photonic electrons : 0,  Dalitz, gama conversions  Remove with Minv cut • Mis-identified particles • Leptons from underlying event ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  7. Lepton Jets at the Tevatron Good agreement between experiment/theory p+p, 1.8 TeV Herwig Simulation: bb di-jets within |η|<1.5 Event selection: (69K e + 15K μ) - di-jet with ETuncorr>15 GeV (<ETparton> ~ 20 GeV) - pT>8 GeV lepton within ΔR < 0.4 - Correction for fake tags In simulation these are due to Gluon-splitting CDF, Phys. Rev. D69 (2004) 072004 hep-ex/0311051 ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  8. Heavy Quark Correlations at RHIC A. Mischke, SQM2007 trigger side statistical errors only scaled by 2.86 3.83% 54% ~10% charm production ~70% from charm ~30% from beauty essentially from B decays only probe side ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  9. Jet rate comparison LHC is a jet factory • Full complement of hard observables accessible: • Identified spectra, RAA • Multi-hadron correlations • Jets: Fragmentation function modifications, -jet coincidences, tagged heavy quark jets, … • Quarkonia ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  10. Large Hadron Collider at CERN Latest Schedule: Summer 2008: commission 14 TeV p+p Winter 2009: first 5.5 TeV Pb+Pb collisions? Lac Leman LHC SPS ALICE CERN ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  11. Spectrum of jet observables 1/event 106/mo. 50 GeV 10 GeV 20 GeV 100 GeV 200 GeV Jet ET ~ 10-30 GeV Jet ET ~ 50-200 GeV Leading particle Spectra Jet reconstruction RAA Tagged jets (-jet, b-jet) Multi-hadron correlations Fragmentation functions Complementarity with RHIC Exclusive to LHC, completely new regime BUT! Need a trigger ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  12. Heavy quark jet production Expected N(QQ) per central A+A Collision: RHICLHC Charm 10 250 Bottom 0.055 E. Norrbin & T. Sjostrand, Eur. Phys. J. C17, 137 (2000) A B C ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  13. Size: 16 x 26 meters Weight: 10,000 tons ALICE TOF TRD HMPID ITS PMD Muon Arm PHOS ALICE TPC ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  14. Tracking/PID Robust, redundant tracking: 100 MeV/c to 100 GeV/c DpT/pT ITS (Silicon): 4<r<44 cm, 6 layers TPC: 85<r<245 cm, 159 pad rows TRD: 290<r<370 cm, 6 layers Central Pb+Pb p+p B field = 0.5 T  good pattern recognition Long lever arm  good momentum resolution Material budget: vertex outer TPC < 0.1 X0 107 Central Pb+Pb events  p K TPC dE/dx ~5.5-6.5% ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC ALICE PPR CERN/LHCC 2003-049

  15. ALICE Electromagnetic Calorimeter • Upgrade to ALICE • ~17 US and European institutions • Current expectations: • 2009 run: partial installation • 2010 run: fully installed and commissioned Lead-scintillator sampling calorimeter Shashlik fiber geometry Avalanche photodiode readout Coverage: ||<0.7, =110° ~13K towers (x~0.014x0.014) Depth ~21 X0 Design resolution: E/E~1% + 8%/√E ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  16. Acceptance/triggering/rates L = 5 x 1026 cm-2 s-1; t = 106 s; 50 GeV jet Rate ~ 1 Hz ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  17. Jet triggering with EMCAL A. Mischke and P. Jacobs, ALICE INT-2005-50 • Background rejection ~ factor of 10 • Centrality dependent threshold • Good efficiency above ~60 GeV ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  18. p+p Pb+Pb    FastJet, M. Cacciari, G. Salaam hep-ph/0512210 N3 Nlog(N) In all cases, a background subtraction method is necessary Geometric nearest neighbor search Jet-finding in Heavy Ion Collisions Cone jet finders Sum energy within cone of R = √(2+2) Conceptually simple Small cones may have own trigger bias  kT algorithms Allow for arbitrary shaped jets  follow the energy flow Less bias on intra-jet shape N3 combinatorics Many methods under investigation in ALICE ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  19. Cone finder results Pb+Pb: E/E~30% for Ejet = 100 GeV Comparable to p+p Background is subtracted event-by-event using information from outside cone within event and statistical average of background from all events R = 0.3, pT > 2 GeV/c ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  20. What contributes to resolution? p+p, pure simulation pT cut has modest effect, R more dramatic Intrinsic limit to resolution if “hidden” neutrals (n,K0L,) are excluded Jet resolution is affected by the cuts (R,pT) which are necessary to reduce the background/fluctuations in Pb+Pb hadron calorimetry vs. tracking Trade-off: resolution vs. background rejection ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  21. Contributions to electron yields • -PYTHIA 6.22 for shapes • -Cross-sections from NLO (Dainese, y<0.9) • Charm: 2.14 mb • Bottom: 0.082 mb • W: 6.5 nb (NLO,Vogt) ALICE EMCAL acceptance W electrons can be distinguished with isolation cuts Calculation by Mark Heinz ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  22. Electron Identification Studies Electron/pion discrimination via cluster properties Electron p/E Studies by Mark Heinz ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  23. Electron/Pion Id Combined cuts reduce pion background with small decrease in efficiency p/E Cluster shape Cluster multiplicity ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  24. Visualizing events in ALICE K+ (pT=8.8GeV) e+ (pT=16.8GeV) b+b scatter, Q2~50 GeV B0 (pT=41.8GeV)  e+ (pT=16.8GeV) + e (pT=3.3GeV) + D- (pT=21.9GeV)  light hadrons (TRD and TOF not shown) ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  25. Putting it together Investigate the differences in fragmentation distributions for tagged and un-tagged jets How similar/different are they? Pb+Pb only Pb+Pb/p+p Simulation studies in progress for EMCAL review ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  26. Summary/Outlook High production rate for heavy quarks and jets at LHC LHC Jet Identification in heavy ions opens up new observable for investigating flavor-dependent medium coupling b-tagging via leptons in jet/di-jet events • Experimental requirements • Jet triggering • Good jet-finding for pTjet > 30 GeV in heavy ions • PID/Momentum resolution for eID/jet fragmentation studies • Secondary vertex reconstruction Are you ready? Collisions are just around the corner! ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  27. Empty ALICE (last year) ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  28. ALICE ca. 11-July-2007 Installation proceeds apace… ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  29. Backup ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  30. Jet-finding Challenges More than one pT > 7 GeV/c particle per event ~1-2 TeV of energy within jet cone of R ~1 Charged particles from Pb+Pb Background* Energy within cone, E(R) Charged particles within jets* Cone radius, R *(Similar for charged + neutral) pT cuts/small cone radii can suppress background, but also influence jet energy resolution Trade-off with hadron calorimetry vs. tracking for jet reconstruction ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

  31. Fluctuations get worse with larger cones Backgrounds • Fluctuations in background energy within jets caused by: • Event-by-event impact parameter variations • Poissonian fluctuations of uncorrelated particles • Correlated particles from other sources (e.g. overlapping low ET jets) • In- and Out-of-Cone fluctuations ETD-HIC 2007, Montreal QC

More Related