1 / 7

Integrating quantitative methods with the employability agenda

Integrating quantitative methods with the employability agenda. h.snaith@aston.ac.uk. Core claims and structure. What is employability? Why might there be a fit with QM? Reframing QM as employability learning Next steps. The context: the employability agenda.

zarek
Télécharger la présentation

Integrating quantitative methods with the employability agenda

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Integrating quantitative methods with the employability agenda h.snaith@aston.ac.uk

  2. Core claims and structure • What is employability? • Why might there be a fit with QM? • Reframing QM as employability learning • Next steps

  3. The context: the employability agenda • Originated in an HEA project with PIs Donna Lee/Emma Foster (Birmingham) • Initial results presented at PSA, full dissemination Summer 2013 • Rooted in low employment rates in politics • Aimed to explore academics’ experience of and attitudes towards employability • Differentiated between ‘elite’ and ‘new’ universities to consider whether the strategies pursued by each showed competitive differentiation

  4. Employability learning • ‘Employability’ a term that is inescapable within academia • Discourse originally about graduate skills, now increasingly about graduate employment – ‘the HEI employability agenda is rather less concerned with developing employable graduates as it is with employedgraduates’ • Employability learning is about giving students tools to manage their own careers • Skills based, experience based, and empowerment based • Of these the first is most commonly used, but the latter are just as important

  5. Why QM? • ‘Graduates need to be able to count to twenty without taking their shoes and socks off’ • One of the few areas of the politics/social science curriculum in which skills training is obvious • Students often don’t like it – partly because they view it as difficult (‘maths’), but partly because they think it is an intrusion into their degree • Numerical ability clearly is useful for employability – both in content terms (e.g. economics employment 90% rather than 60% for politics at Birmingham) and for graduate scheme apps • Also undergoing a pedagogical resurgence of late under pressure from government and private sector

  6. Reframing QM and employability • QM usually framed as skills – but can we shift the discourse towards experience or empowerment? • Considering assessments as reflections of things they would otherwise do • Raising numeracy for future careers – does this increase buy in or enthusiasm? • Making subject integration clear (curricular engagement e.g. Newcastle ESRC scheme) • But issues of resources, responsibility, and interest • Disconnect between what students say they want and what they do (‘I want a degree to get me a job’ ‘I will never use this module’)

  7. Next steps: working with students • Curricular work is often quite displaced from employability initiatives • Study at Loughborough (ESRC CI) – pre and post-testing of undergraduates in sociology, at Aston (linguistics), etc • Ideally follow a longitudinal cohort pre-and post employment engagement (e.g. placements) • Speaking to placements/careers services direct, not just academics

More Related