1 / 16

SRR: The Smoothed Round Robin Scheduler

SRR: The Smoothed Round Robin Scheduler. Paul Southerington ECE 742 5 May 2005. Overview. Design Goals Why is it significant? How does it work?. General Goals of Scheduler. Conflicting Design Goals Fairness SRR Attempts to provide long-term and short-term fairness Bounded Delay

zasha
Télécharger la présentation

SRR: The Smoothed Round Robin Scheduler

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SRR: The Smoothed Round Robin Scheduler Paul Southerington ECE 742 5 May 2005

  2. Overview • Design Goals • Why is it significant? • How does it work?

  3. General Goals of Scheduler • Conflicting Design Goals • Fairness • SRR Attempts to provide long-term and short-term fairness • Bounded Delay • Scalability • Complexity • SRR Claims O(1) Complexity • Formal Proofs in original paper

  4. Overview • So how does it work? • Weight Spread Sequences • Weight Matrix • Scheduler Operation

  5. The Weight Spread Sequence • Spreads flow service time across entire round • Values map to columns of matrix • k is the order of the WSS • Chosen based on flow weights • Defined recursively: • Sk = Sk-1, k, Sk-1 • S1 = 1

  6. The Weight Spread Sequence (2) • Length = 2k - 1 • Sample: k=1 through k=4 • S1 = 1 • S2 = 1 2 1 • S3 = 1 2 1 3 1 2 1 • S4 = 1 2 1 3 1 2 1 4 1 2 1 3 1 2 1

  7. The Weight Matrix • One row for each traffic flow • Number of Columns = k= log2(wmax) • Same as order of WSS • Each row is a Weight Vector • Series of binary coefficients • Represent each flow weight in binary • Each bit comprises one element of matrix

  8. Sample Weight Matrix • Weights: w1=5, w2=2, w3=2, w4=3, w5=1

  9. Scheduler Operation • Scan WSS from left-to-right • For each entry in WSS: • Serve traffic from flows in matching column • Flows served sequentially (top-to-bottom) • Move to next entry in WSS • Start Over

  10. Sample Weight Matrix • Weights: w1=5, w2=2, w3=2, w4=3, w5=1 • WSS = S3 = 1 2 1 3 1 2 1 • Service order: f1, f2, f3, f4, f1, f1, f4, f5, f1, f2, f3, f4, f1

  11. Sample Service Curve

  12. SRR Implementation (1) • Weight Matrix and WSS • Size may be fixed • WSS may be precomputed • Can tradeoff granularity for max speed • With 32nd-order WSS: • 4 Tbps with 1 kbps resolution • 8 Tbps with 2 kbps resolution

  13. SRR Implementation (2) • Three Functions • Add_flow() • Executed whenever a new flow arrives • Adds new entry to bottom of doubly-linked list (column) • Worst-case O(k) operation, not O(1)! • Del_flow() • Executed when a flow is no longer backlogged • Basically Add_flow() in reverse

  14. SRR Implementation (3) • Three Functions (contd.) • Schedule() • Operates as described in previous example • Also handles deficit value • Add_flow and Del_flow called from here

  15. Future Improvements • Improvements to Add_flow and Del_flow • Try to improve worst-case O(k) performance • Parallel operation • WSS Compression • Remove WSS elements for empty columns • May not be possible to implement efficiently

  16. Conclusions • Elegant solution to conflicting design goals • May not really perform at O(1) • Still some room for improvement

More Related