1 / 11

Annette von Lossau, GTZ, Germany www://gtz.de/agrobiodiv Irene Hoffmann, FAO-AGAP

Inter-sectorial collaboration on Biodiversity: Experiences of the Bamako Workshop. People and Biodiversity. Annette von Lossau, GTZ, Germany www://gtz.de/agrobiodiv Irene Hoffmann, FAO-AGAP. Background and Rationale Situation in West Africa.

zeal
Télécharger la présentation

Annette von Lossau, GTZ, Germany www://gtz.de/agrobiodiv Irene Hoffmann, FAO-AGAP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Inter-sectorial collaboration on Biodiversity: Experiences of the Bamako Workshop People and Biodiversity Annette von Lossau, GTZ, Germany www://gtz.de/agrobiodiv Irene Hoffmann, FAO-AGAP

  2. Background and RationaleSituation in West Africa • Biodiversity is under threat, relevant for MDGs • Inappropriate legal framework • Insecurity on national level how to deal with genetic resources People and Biodiversity • Low understanding of agrobiodiversity and knowledge gaps • No intersectorial platform • No formal and organized exchange between GOs and NGOs

  3. Challenges • reconcile the conservation of agricultural and “natural” biodiversity • Integrate the implementation of biodiversity related policy in a range of institutional and economic systems People and Biodiversity • synergy between the international conventions • vertical integration • horizontal integration

  4. Bamako workshop as an instrument for mainstreaming biodiversity Objectives • Analysis of contraints for the sustainable use of biodiversity People and Biodiversity • Estimation of needs for the development biodiverstity policies • Development of a common vision and understanding • Action plan

  5. Workshop on Agrobiodiversity, Bamako 15th to 19th December 2003 Participants coming from a range of countries: • 5 focal countries: Benin, Burkina Faso, Mali, Mauritania and Senegal. • 10 observer countries Participants representing a diversity of official institutions and civil society: People and Biodiversity • Focal points • Line Ministries • National, regional and international NGOs and Networks • Research Centres • Funding agencies

  6. Procedure • Organized by a steering committee • Establishment of national intersectorial preparation groups • Co-financed by different partners People and Biodiversity • Inputs: • Analysis of the legal and institutional framework • National case studies • Analysis of the state of agrobiodiversity

  7. Most outstanding points of national inputs • Farmers and livestock keepers are custodians of genetic resources • Loss of species, varieties and breeds • Insufficient valorisation of agrobiodiversity for food security People and Biodiversity • Insufficient human and financial resources at local level • Unclear land tenure rights • Missing coordination between different actors

  8. Most important results • Creation of a “momentum” • Better understanding and knowledge People and Biodiversity • Cooperation established/strengthened • Participatory elaboration of action plans

  9. Follow up • Workshop proceedings • Continued networking • Draft project proposal People and Biodiversity • Submission of draft proposal

  10. Challenges and lessons learnt • Networking and cooperation = outstanding benefit • Participatory approach of different stakeholder entry point for enhanced participation beyond ”classic” actors People and Biodiversity • Strengthening the ownership needed • Action plan reflects complex situation • Draft proposal in line with requirements of different donors • Insufficient involvement of private sector

  11. Thank you!

More Related