1 / 8

Enhancing General Practices through Qualified Medical Support: Evaluation of AGnES Model Project

The AGnES project aimed to improve the quality of primary care in Germany by integrating qualified medical practice personnel into general practices. This evaluation highlights the project's impact on quality of care and acceptance among general practitioners. Results show significant improvements in patient management and practice efficiency, alongside positive feedback from practitioners on the support received. This study serves as a model for enhancing general practice through qualified personnel, ultimately aiming for better patient outcomes and practice satisfaction.

zelda-turner
Télécharger la présentation

Enhancing General Practices through Qualified Medical Support: Evaluation of AGnES Model Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Berg, N v d; Meinke, C; Heymann, R; Fiß, T; Suckert, E; Pöller, C; Dreier, A; Rogalski, H; Karopka, T; Oppermann, R; Hoffmann, W AGnES: Supporting General PractitionersWithQualified Medical Practice Personnel – Model Project Evaluation Regarding Quality andAcceptance DtschArzteblInt 2009; 106(1-2): 3-9, DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0003

  2. Berg, N v d; Meinke, C; Heymann, R; Fiß, T; Suckert, E; Pöller, C; Dreier, A; Rogalski, H; Karopka, T; Oppermann, R; Hoffmann, W AGnES: Supporting General PractitionersWithQualified Medical Practice Personnel – Model Project Evaluation Regarding Quality andAcceptance DtschArzteblInt 2009; 106(1-2): 3-9, DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0003

  3. Berg, N v d; Meinke, C; Heymann, R; Fiß, T; Suckert, E; Pöller, C; Dreier, A; Rogalski, H; Karopka, T; Oppermann, R; Hoffmann, W AGnES: Supporting General PractitionersWithQualified Medical Practice Personnel – Model Project Evaluation Regarding Quality andAcceptance DtschArzteblInt 2009; 106(1-2): 3-9, DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0003

  4. Berg, N v d; Meinke, C; Heymann, R; Fiß, T; Suckert, E; Pöller, C; Dreier, A; Rogalski, H; Karopka, T; Oppermann, R; Hoffmann, W AGnES: Supporting General PractitionersWithQualified Medical Practice Personnel – Model Project Evaluation Regarding Quality andAcceptance DtschArzteblInt 2009; 106(1-2): 3-9, DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0003

  5. Berg, N v d; Meinke, C; Heymann, R; Fiß, T; Suckert, E; Pöller, C; Dreier, A; Rogalski, H; Karopka, T; Oppermann, R; Hoffmann, W AGnES: Supporting General PractitionersWithQualified Medical Practice Personnel – Model Project Evaluation Regarding Quality andAcceptance DtschArzteblInt 2009; 106(1-2): 3-9, DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0003

  6. Berg, N v d; Meinke, C; Heymann, R; Fiß, T; Suckert, E; Pöller, C; Dreier, A; Rogalski, H; Karopka, T; Oppermann, R; Hoffmann, W AGnES: Supporting General PractitionersWithQualified Medical Practice Personnel – Model Project Evaluation Regarding Quality andAcceptance DtschArzteblInt 2009; 106(1-2): 3-9, DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0003

  7. Berg, N v d; Meinke, C; Heymann, R; Fiß, T; Suckert, E; Pöller, C; Dreier, A; Rogalski, H; Karopka, T; Oppermann, R; Hoffmann, W AGnES: Supporting General PractitionersWithQualified Medical Practice Personnel – Model Project Evaluation Regarding Quality andAcceptance DtschArzteblInt 2009; 106(1-2): 3-9, DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0003

  8. Berg, N v d; Meinke, C; Heymann, R; Fiß, T; Suckert, E; Pöller, C; Dreier, A; Rogalski, H; Karopka, T; Oppermann, R; Hoffmann, W AGnES: Supporting General PractitionersWithQualified Medical Practice Personnel – Model Project Evaluation Regarding Quality andAcceptance DtschArzteblInt 2009; 106(1-2): 3-9, DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0003

More Related