1 / 5

Environmental Regulation

Environmental Regulation. Bargaining, Standards, Taxes & Fines, Trading of Emissions Allowances. The Coase Theorem. Under ideal conditions, efficient solutions to externalities are realized by bargaining among the affected parties, regardless of the assignment of property rights.

Télécharger la présentation

Environmental Regulation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Environmental Regulation Bargaining, Standards, Taxes & Fines, Trading of Emissions Allowances

  2. The Coase Theorem • Under ideal conditions, efficient solutions to externalities are realized by bargaining among the affected parties, regardless of the assignment of property rights. • Coase’s Example: straying cattle • Is it an “Impossibility” Theorem? • Ignores equity – who gets bargaining rent • Ignores strategic possibilities • Extortion by threats to pollute • Ignores transaction costs • Organizing, free riders, cross state lines, smoking example

  3. Taxes & Fines vs. Standards • Without regulation, private MC of pollution is less than social MC • Optimal tax • Raises private MC = social MC = MB (demand) • Collects tax revenue • Optimal fine similar, F* = MB • Standards reduce Q of polluting good • Same outcome as tax if set correctly • Preferred by producers since profits increase • Both entail enforcement costs • Monitor to enforce standard • Prevent tax evasion

  4. Uncertainty and Heterogeneity • Set standard, PC*, expecting pollution control cost MC1 = MB • If true MC0 > MC1, impose excessive cost • If true MC2 < MC1, lose foregone benefits • Similar outcomes if MC varies across sites • Solutions • Differential standards – “new site bias” • Trade allowances to establish price • Netting, offsets, bubbles & banking

  5. Effect of Clean Air Regulation

More Related