1 / 3

Defining the intersection between AR and AR4D (from 1rst meeting of the EU Africa HLGE)

Defining the intersection between AR and AR4D (from 1rst meeting of the EU Africa HLGE).

zena
Télécharger la présentation

Defining the intersection between AR and AR4D (from 1rst meeting of the EU Africa HLGE)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Defining the intersection between AR and AR4D(from 1rst meeting of the EU Africa HLGE) Intersection of what: Common development challenges ? Or research question ? Or Innovation process ? Or shared interest ?Intersect at what level ? Global : climate change, adaptation food prices volatilityMeso: shared infrastructures, skilled communitiesMicro : research topic , like food and diet related obesity, development of drought resistant crops….

  2. Defining the intersection between AR and AR4D(from 1rst meeting of the EU Africa HLGE) Suggested categories of AR / AR4D common research issues:Global issues (climate change)Basic knowledge, including research infrastructures (gene discovery )Boundary issues (avian flu, plant pests…) Mutual /common issues (rural livelihoods) Methodological issues (multi-scale modeling, excellence versus impact)Institutional issues (PPP, science and society)

  3. Defining the intersection between AR and AR4D(from ARCH commissioned study) Study on how to improve complementarities between EC investments in AR through FP 7/H2020 and in AR4D through FSTPRecommendations raised a number of institutional issues: - have explicit policy goals (H2020 better than FP 7) - competitive calls versus target funding (eligibility criteria, transparency, ex ante evaluation or ex post performance) - promote dialogue between research communities and synergies between programs (FACCE/ CCAFS)- co-fund a Knowledge hub (=> a global TAP?)

More Related