1 / 19

Acceptance Testing

Acceptance Testing. The Quilt Optical Workshop June 22, 2004 pschopis@oar.net. Outline. Background Layered approach Specific targets Physical Layer Optical Layer Full System. Testing Background. Adapted lab approach Examples on Web at ITEC sites

zenda
Télécharger la présentation

Acceptance Testing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Acceptance Testing The Quilt Optical Workshop June 22, 2004 pschopis@oar.net

  2. Outline • Background • Layered approach • Specific targets • Physical Layer • Optical Layer • Full System

  3. Testing Background • Adapted lab approach • Examples on Web at ITEC sites • http://www.nc-itec.org/archive/CAR/plan.html • http://www.adec.edu/nsf/index.html

  4. Disclaimer • OARnet purchased existing fiber from vendors • OARnet used SBC as integrator

  5. Test Case Outline • Start with baseline • State explicit requirements for test • State clear testing procedure • State expected outcome • State success criteria • Make subsequent tests dependant on the success of previous test

  6. NOTE: • If using an integrator at least make acceptance criteria part of the Scope of Work (SOW) • Understand how much testing they will do for price paid • Understand what the integrator will charge for additional testing • Have existing test criteria from IRU and hold vendors feet to the fire.

  7. Layered Approach • Full System (Layer 2 &3 functional network) is dependant on optical layer • Optical layer is dependant on Physical Layer • Physical layer is dependant on fiber type, quality of splicing and mechanical connections • By now you know where I’m going with this • A full blown test plan is a lot of work but helps with documenting network baselines for future • If using a SOW it can be substituted for test plan as long as all documentation and segmentation of data is maintained

  8. Targets Physical Layer • Fiber characterization should include • Testing with all fiber components installed e.g. FDP, pigtails etc • Should meet manufacturers dbm per linear measure (Kilometers or Miles) • All splices should meet stated criteria (Note: average over span seems to be more important) • Dispersion should meet fiber manufacturers specifications • Note: Reflection is the boogeyman all others seem easily addressed (-29 db is acceptable, at least in our system)

  9. Target Physical Layer • All OTDR are performed at 1550 and 1625 nm ( C and L bands) • Telcordia specs for ORL < -27 ideal < -40 • All PMD set for 10 Gigabits = 10ps/km, ( 2.5Gbps = 40ps/km, 40 Gbps = 2.5 • Chromatic dispersion 16 to 12K ps/nm for 2.5, 800 to 1000ps/nm for 10 Gbps, 40 Gbps 60 to 100 ps/nm

  10. Targets Physical Layer • Poor splicing that results in reflection must be addressed • Overall dirt in providers bulk heads has been easy but time consuming to correct

  11. Targets Optical Layer • All gear is staged and burned in • All gear is configured in staging and tested to make sure send/receive specifications are met • All gear is configured in staging using fiber characterization data • Post installation all gear is tested, a BERT is run for 24 hours at max load.

  12. Targets Optical Layer • Throughput e.g. Frame Loss • Back-to-back ( duration, binary search) • Verify receiver high/low sensitivity • Verify receiver LOS sensitivity • Verify DWDM Send/Receiver Sensitivity • Verify optical laser output • Verify framing/encapsulation

  13. Targets Optical LayerFinal Acceptance • All nodes are powered down and brought back up to insure proper service recovery • All fiber jumpers are installed correctly • All power is run correctly and verified to meet specs • Cabinet access tool is hanging on back of cabinet

  14. Full System • All routers and switches are attached to optical devices • Routers and switches are configured and brought on line • All point-to-point links tested under load with souce/sink bidirectioanlly for 24 hours.

  15. Questions?

More Related