1 / 21

MANEMO Applicability of existing mechanism

Ryuji Wakikawa (Keio U). MANEMO Applicability of existing mechanism. MANEMO Problems. MR4. MR3. MR2. MR1. MR1. MR4. MR3. MR2. HA3. HA3. HA2. HA2. HA1. HA4. HA1. HA4. INTERNET. INTERNET. CN. AR. AR. Issue 1: Sub-optimal path Communication in Nested NEMO.

zeroun
Télécharger la présentation

MANEMO Applicability of existing mechanism

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ryuji Wakikawa (Keio U) MANEMO Applicability of existing mechanism

  2. MANEMO Problems MR4 MR3 MR2 MR1 MR1 MR4 MR3 MR2 HA3 HA3 HA2 HA2 HA1 HA4 HA1 HA4 INTERNET INTERNET CN AR AR

  3. Issue 1: Sub-optimal pathCommunication in Nested NEMO

  4. Optimal Path for internal communication MR4 MR3 MR2 MR1 MR1 MR4 MR3 MR2 HA3 HA3 HA2 HA2 HA1 HA4 HA1 HA4 INTERNET INTERNET CN AR AR

  5. MANET/AUTOCONF Applicability Required functions Prefix Route Exchange for neighboring MRs (MNP) Address assignment for local communication in nested NEMO NEMO MR exchanges prefix route of own MNP routes the packets to the destination according to the prefix route if available bypass the HA (no tunnel) HA3 HA2 HA1 HA4 INTERNET CN AR/IGW ANP::/64 LL:LMR1 ANP::MR1 LL:MR2 ANP::MR2 MR1 MR2 LL::MR4 ANP::MR4 LL:MR3 ANP::MR3 MR4 MR3

  6. Considerations Routing Scope? 1-hop? (NDP) 2-hop? (NHDP) n-hop? (MANET) Who should participate in the MANET? mobile router (MR) fixed router (FR) mobile network node (MNN) mobile host (MH) Which address is used? link local? unique site-local? global address owned by each MR, HoA? (unique, topology incorrect) obtained from upper MR? (topology incorrect) obtained from AR?(topology correct) Is Tunnel required? NO HA independent

  7. MANET/AUTOCONF applicability

  8. NHDP vs NDP NDP Mobile IPv6 based protocols rely on NDP for movement detection (DNA) network reachable detection (Router reachability) address configuration (including DAD) Neighbor Unreachability Detection returning home operation 1-hop neighboring information NHDP offers similar functionalities of NDP 2-hop neighbors information link information How can mobile router interact with NDP and NHDP simultaneously?! conflicting reachability information conflicting routing table information

  9. Issue 2: Sub-optimal Pathfrom Nested NEMO to the Internet

  10. Optimal Path from nested NEMO to the Internet MR1 MR2 MR3 MR4 MR4 MR3 MR2 MR1 HA3 HA3 HA2 HA2 HA1 HA4 HA1 HA4 INTERNET INTERNET CN CN AR AR

  11. Required functions Global topology correct address assignment from AR Route setup to AR (Internet) Sending BU and Creating tunnel NEMO MR sends BU for the global address to its HA Tunnel setup routes the packets of other MRs AR/IGW MUST NOT leak the prefix routes to the Internet MANET/AUTOCONF Applicability HA3 HA2 HA1 HA4 INTERNET CN AR/IGW ANP::/64 ANP::MR1 ANP::MR2 MR1 MR2 ANP::MR4 ANP::MR3 MR3 MR4

  12. Considerations Routing Scope? 1-hop? (NDP) 2-hop? (NHDP) n-hop? (MANET) Who should participate in the manet? mobile router (MR) fixed router (FR) mobile network node (MNN) mobile host (MH) Which address is used? link local? unique site-local? global address owned by each MR, HoA? (topology incorrect) obtained from upper MR? (topology incorrect) obtained from AR?(topology correct) Is Tunnel required? YES HA dependent

  13. MANET/AUTOCONF applicability

  14. AR/IGW involvement AR/IGW nested NEMO aware • The problem of Nested NEMO HA3 HA2 HA1 HA4 • AR/IGW NOT Nested NEMO aware INTERNET • Prefix Delegation to MR1 CN • MR1 takes roles of IGW/AR • a bit optimization AR/IGW ANP::/64 ANP::MR1 MR1::MR2 MR1 MANEMO Scope?? MR2 MR1::MR4 MR1::MR3 MR4 MR3

  15. Possible Issue: divide a Nested NEMO Nested NEMO-1 Nested NEMO-2 An IPv6 router in a mobile network, named Fixed Router, may divide a nested NEMO, unless it is MANET aware. FR is MANET aware, full optimization FR is NOT MANET aware, it is still better than the basic nested NEMO AR ANP::/48 AR ANP::/64 ANP::MR1 ANP:1::/64 ANP:1::MR1 MR1 MR1 MNP1::/64 MNP1::/64 FR FR MNP1:1::/64 MNP1:1::/64 MNP1:1::MR2 ANP:2::/64?? ANP:2::MR2?? MR2 MR2 MNP2::/64 MNP2::/64

  16. Impact of MR movement AR1 AR2 ANP1::/48 ANP2::/48 ANP1:1::MR1 MR1 MNP1::/64 ANP1:2::MR2 MR2 MNP2::/64 ANP1:3::MR3 ANP1:4::MR4 MR3 MR4 MNP3::/64 MNP4::/64

  17. Impact of MR movement ANP2::/48 AR1 AR2 ANP1::/48 ANP2:1::MR1 MR1 A MR movement causes address changes on all the other MRs. -> MR MUST update CoA -> MR MUST send BU -> MR MAY re-calculate routes This is orthogonal to the NEMO basic functionality, movement transparency. MNP1::/64 ANP2:2::MR2 MR2 MNP2::/64 ANP2:3::MR3 ANP2:4::MR4 MR3 MR4 MNP3::/64 MNP4::/64

  18. The NEMO Addressing: Movement Transparency AR1 AR2 ANP1::/48 ANP2::/48 ANP1::MR1 ANP2::MR1 MR1 MR1 MNP1::/64 MNP1::/64 MNP1::MR2 MNP1::MR2 MR2 MR2 MNP2::/64 MNP2::/64 MR3 MR4 MR3 MR4 MNP3::/64 MNP4::/64 MNP3::/64 MNP4::/64

  19. Multihoming Capability A MR may obtain multiple addresses in Nested NEMO, 1) NEMO topologically incorrect address & 2) AUTOCONF topologically correct address. INTERNET INTERNET AUTOCONF NEMO AR AR ANP::/48 ANP::/64 ANP:1::MR1 ANP:1::/64 ANP::MR1 MR1 MR1 MNP1::/64 Prefix Delegation MNP1::/64 MNP1::MR2 ANP:2::/64 Which is CoA? ANP:2::MR2 (from AR) MNP1::MR2 (from MR1) MR's HoA (from HA) MR2 MR2 MNP2::/64 MNP2::/64

  20. Monami6 Applicability?? It can register both addresses as CoA with MCoA (Monami6), although it may not help anything for the nested NEMO. HA2 HA1 MR2's binding ANP:2::MR2 (BID1) MNP1::MR2 (BID2) INTERNET AR ANP::/48 • Tunnel Selection? • HoA/CoA Selection? • Path Selection? • (I.e.tunnel or MANET direct) ANP:1::MR1 ANP:1::/64 MR1 MNP1::/64 Prefix Delegation ANP:2::/64 ANP:2::MR2 MNP1::MR2 MR2 NEMO&AUTOCONF MNP2::/64

  21. Some Overall Observations • Integration of NEMO, AUTOCONF, OLSR/DYMO, NHDP, NDP…. • MR obtains IPv6 address through NDP or AUTOCONF • MR updates routes by OLSR/DYMO, NHDP, NEMO(tunnel), NDP • MR checks reachability by NDP and NHDP • Interoperability & backward compatibility • MR is not always participating in MANET, but attaches to the legacy v6 link

More Related