1 / 19

Chapter 4 - Evaluating Financial Performance

Chapter 4 - Evaluating Financial Performance. Financial Analysis – process of assessing financial condition of a firm Principal analytic tool is the financial ratio Understand ratios and what they mean. Ratio Analysis. Identify firm’s strengths and weaknesses

zeus-davis
Télécharger la présentation

Chapter 4 - Evaluating Financial Performance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Chapter 4 - Evaluating Financial Performance • Financial Analysis – process of assessing financial condition of a firm • Principal analytic tool is the financial ratio • Understand ratios and what they mean

  2. Ratio Analysis • Identify firm’s strengths and weaknesses • Comparison of the firm over time or with other firms • Industry averages – benchmarks • Robert Morris Associates, Dun & Bradstreet • Four types of ratios: liquidity, efficiency, leverage and profitability

  3. Ratios and Major Questions • How liquid is the firm? • Are adequate operating profits being generated? • How is the firm financing its assets? • Are shareholders receiving an adequate return?

  4. How Liquid is the Firm? • Liquidity – ability to meet maturing obligations • Enough resources to pay when due? • How do liquid assets compare with debt? • Compare cash and assets to be converted to cash with debt due in same period • Can firm convert receivables/inventories to cash on timely basis? How quick or long?

  5. Liquidity • Current ratio – conventional wisdom says 2:1 but there is “the lettuce problem”. • Acid test or quick ratio – (CA - Inv)/ CL • Collection period – how many days to collect receivables = AR / DCrS = say 20 • Turnover – how many times are AR rolled over during a year? = CS/AR = say 18 X • By most of these measures, McD less liquid

  6. Collection Period & Turnover Measure the same thing – are reciprocals 365 days = 17.9 X 365 Days = 20.4days 20.4 days 17.9 X McD not good at collections (20 days vs. 7) Are longer credit terms good or bad? Competitive necessity or weak management ? Receivables aging – good footnote

  7. Inventory Turnover • Turnover Ratio = Cost of Goods Sold (Times per year) Inventory • Why COGS? Need cost-based numbers in numerator and denominator • If less liquid, greater chance to be unable to pay on time. • McD – excellent inventory management (87 times a year versus 35)

  8. Cash Conversion Cycle • To reduce working capital, speed up collections, turn inventory faster, slow disbursements • Sum of days required to collect + days in inventory - Days of Payable Outstanding • DPO = Accounts Payable = say 29 COGS / 365

  9. Operating Profits – Adequate? • Text tells us to use operating profits • GP ignores marketing exp; NP includes financing effects • OIROI – Operating Income Return on Investment – op profits relative to assets OIROI = Operating Income Total Assets McD generates more income per $ of assets

  10. OIROI • Separate OIROI into its two pieces: OIROI = OPM * TAT 15.4% = 23.4% * .66 • Operating Profit Margin = Op. Income Sales • Management’s effectiveness in keeping costs in line with sales; McD = very good

  11. Total Asset Turnover • TAT = Sales = .66 Total Assets • Amount of sales generated by $1 of assets • Higher turnover better; good use of asset • McD – weak $0.66 in sales per $ of assets • Where’s the problem? Check components

  12. Total Asset Turnover • McD very weak. But why? • TurnoverMcDonalds Peers • Receivables 17.9 X = Bad 56 • Inventory 87 Good 35 • Fixed Assets .84 Bad 3.2

  13. OIROI Summary • OIROI = Operating Inc. * Sales Sales Total Assets • McD effectively keeps costs and operating expenses low, but is not particularly good in managing its assets Overall, they are doing better than the competitors – OIROI = 15. 4% versus 11.6%

  14. How Does Firm Finance Assets? • What percentage of assets are financed by debt and how much by equity? • Debt includes all liabilities, both short and long-term Debt Ratio = Total Debt Total Assets • McD uses significantly less debt (54 vs 69%)

  15. Times Interest Earned • TIE – how much operating income is available to meet interest expense? Or, how many times is it covering annual interest? • TIE = Operating Income = 7.5 Times Interest Expense McD – no problem in paying int. Op. Inc. could fall to 1/7th of current level and still pay (1/7.5)

  16. Adequate Returns? • Are stockholders receiving an adequate return on their investment? Is it attractive compared to other companies? Return on Com Equity = Net Income Common Equity Equity = PV+ P-I + RE but no preferred stock McD – profitability fully offsets low leverage

  17. What Can We Say About McD • Its liquidity is average even with low receivable turnover; good on inventory • OIROI is good;good profitability offsets low asset turnover • Uses less debt than competitors • Good Return on Equity; uses less debt but this offset by greater profitability.

  18. Limitations With Ratios • Difficult to identify industry categories • No exact peers • Averages are only approximates • Accounting principles differ • Ratios can be too high or too low • Industry averages include “stars and dogs” • However, ratios are still useful tools

  19. Unmentioned Problems • Old firm versus new • Have assets been depreciated? • Window dressing • Actions to make good at year end • Role of “revolvers” • Some ratios make you look good, others make look bad • Overall – look at several combinations

More Related