1 / 1

Dynamics and decoherence of a qubit coupled to a two-level system

Dynamics and decoherence of a qubit coupled to a two-level system. S. Ashhab 1 , J. R. Johansson 1 and Franco Nori 1,2 1 Frontier Research System, The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research (RIKEN), Wako, Saitama, Japan

zeus-kelley
Télécharger la présentation

Dynamics and decoherence of a qubit coupled to a two-level system

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Dynamics and decoherence of a qubit coupled to a two-level system S. Ashhab1, J. R. Johansson1 and Franco Nori1,2 1Frontier Research System, The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research (RIKEN), Wako, Saitama, Japan 2Center for Theoretical Physics, CSCS, Department of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA Summary We study the effects of an uncontrollable quantum two-level system (TLS) on the qubit dynamics. We consider both the decoherence dynamics and the qubit’s response to an oscillating external field. Model of qubit-environment Decoherence dynamics Hamiltonian: Outside dashed line: We only need to know S(w). Inside dashed line: We need to know exact nature of the noise sources. Master equation: Trace out TLS Density matrix of entire system Qubit dynamics. Q1: When can we use the classical picture? Results: 1 - Weakly vs. strongly dissipative TLS Dephasing Relaxation a) Focus on one quantum TLS. Short transient time ~1/GTLS followed by exponential decay. I.e., the steady state is an exponential decay with a corrected Gq. b) Transient time ~1/GTLS comparable to decoherence time (1/Gq). A steady state exponential decay is almost reached. Q2: What happens if we try to drive Rabi oscillations in the qubit? Longer TLS T1, T2Þ More memory Þ Non-markovian behavior c) Estimated transient time ~1/GTLS exceeds decoherence time (1/Gq). Qubit decay cannot be described in terms of exponential decay functions, i.e., no G1q andG2q. Rabi oscillations Energy levels in dressed-state picture: Results: 2 – Weakly vs. strongly coupled TLS When the coupling strength is larger than all decoherence rates in the problem ÞStrong coupling. Otherwise Þ Weak coupling. Rabi resonance peak splits into two when coupling strength is increased. Expected result: Results: 3 – Comparison with traditional weak-coupling approximation Traditional weak-coupling approximation Green: analytic expression in traditional weak-coupling approximation Blue: analytic expression in weak-coupling limit of quantum picture Red: numerical simulation of quantum picture Y-axis: Maximum qubit excitation probability between t=0 and t=20p/W0. Additional results: • Zero detuning peak: two-photon process flipping both qubit and TLS states. • Dips in resonance-peak structure: these occur when some of the oscillation frequencies are integer multiples of each other. • Asymmetry between the two main peaks: lower-frequency peak has a larger contribution from the two-photon process. G1 Perturbation theory in quantum picture Largest G Weak coupling Strong coupling l (coupling strength) With decoherence: Solid line: no decoherence. Dashed line: strong TLS decoherence Þ TLS becomes weakly coupled. Dotted line: moderate decoherence on both. Þ Narrow features are suppressed. Dash-dotted line: strong qubit decoherence. Þ Qubit cannot perform Rabi oscillations. The two approaches differ when the condition: is not satisfied. Supported in part by the Frontier Research System at RIKEN, JSPS, the US AFOSR, ARDA, NSA, and the US National Science Foundation. cond-mat/0512677 and cond-mat/0602577. Corresponding author: Sahel Ashhab, ashhab@riken.jp

More Related