Online Discussions
240 likes | 461 Vues
Online Discussions. HMOA 5403. By Bundhun Amit Varma. Objectives. Define Online Discussion Recognise models of online discussions Synchronous Asynchronous Distinguish three characteristics of synchronous discussion asynchronous discussion
Online Discussions
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Online Discussions HMOA 5403 By BundhunAmitVarma
Objectives • Define Online Discussion • Recognise models of online discussions • Synchronous • Asynchronous • Distinguish three characteristics of • synchronous discussion • asynchronous discussion • Explain three major processes in online discussions • Relate to the Productive online discussion model • Identify six successful factors for online discussion
What is Online Discussion? • Interaction method • among Students • between Student and online facilitator • Demonstrate students' competencies through activities • Brainstorming and Web field trips • Problem Solving and case analysis • Cooperative Debate and Collaborative writing • Online assessment method • through active and effective participation • Uses technology • Internet, Computers, Web Cam, Speakers
Two Models for online discussion • Web conferencing (Synchronous) • Virtual meeting • Virtual classes • Web seminar/ Webinar • Discussion Forums (Asynchronous) • Discussion threads • Blog comments
Web Conferencing • Combination of audio and video interaction • Real time broadcast of workshop • Synchronous discussion • Viewing of office applications and resources
Discussion Forum • Allows discussion on topics • Conversation are organised in a main thread and responses • Asynchronous • Facilitates group work and collaboration
Characteristics of synchronous discussions • Collaborative work • Instant Feedback • Simulate face to face discussions for remote students
Characteristics for asynchronous discussion • Development of critical thinking on discussion topics • More time to think on topic discussed • More meaningful analysis from other participant comments. (Meyer,2007) • Extra research before commenting (Du, Zhang, Olinzock, & Adams, 2008) • Equal opportunity for participation • Formation of social ties • Increase student to student discussion • Collaboration
Major process in online discussion • Cognitive • elementary clarification, • in-depth clarification • inference • judgment • Strategies • Linking ideas • Critical assessment (Newman, Johnson, Cochrane, and Webb ,1995)
Major process in online discussion • Argumentation • Triggering event • Searching for clarification and attempting to orient one’s attention • Integrating the information and knowledge into a coherent idea or concept • the resolution of the issue or problem (Garrison, Anderson, and Archer’s ,2000) Events
Major process in online discussion • Social knowledge Construction • sharing/comparing of information • discovery and exploration of dissonance or inconsistency among ideas, concepts or statements • negotiation of meaning/co-construction of knowledge • testing and modification of proposed synthesis or co-construction • agreement statement(s)/application of newly constructed meaning • (Gunawardena et al. ,1997)
Productive online discussion model Productive Online Discussion Model (Gao, F., Wang, C., & Sun, Y, 2009)
Six factors for sucessful online discussion • Clear Instruction • Feedback • Motivation • Expectations • Structure of discussion • Dialogue strategies
Factors for successful online discussion • Clear Instructions • Simple • Exact • Eliminate confusion • I know what to do
Factors for successful online discussion • Feedback • Provide clarification when needed • Guide students to have in depth discussion • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) to learners FAQ
Factors for successful online discussion • Motivation • Make discussion relevant to learner • Include online discussion participation in the course grade • Make participation requirement explicit • Grading • Rubrics • Interactive learning environment • Can I do this task? • Why I am doing this task? • How can I do this task ?
Factors for successful online discussion • Expectations • set of guidelines for appropriateness • specific about the quality and level of posts • Length of message • Level of formality • Criteria for acceptable response • Resources to be consulted
Factors for successful online discussion • Structure of discussion • Encourage a good level of socialization • connect the discussions to the course objectives. • Model types of discussions • Set deadlines for participation
Factors for successful online discussion • Effective Dialogue Strategies University of Oregon Teaching Effectiveness Program
Conclusion • Online discussion • Important learning means in distance learning • Promote High Order Thinking • Need much planning and design • Knowledge creation tool • Learners’ Participation is mandatory • Facilitated through motivation and relevancy • Encompasses the three major theories of learning • Behaviourism, cognitivism and constructivism
References • Al- Shalchi, O. N. (2009). The effectiveness and development of online discussions. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(1), 104-108 • Du, J., Zhang, K., Olinzock, A., & Adams, J. (2008). Graduate students’ perspectives on the meaningful nature of online discussions. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(1), 21-36. • Gao, F., Wang, C., & Sun, Y, (2009). A new model of productive online discussion and its implications for research and instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 2(1), 65-78. • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 1-19. • Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global on-line debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397-431. • Generating and Facilitating Engaging and Effective Online Discussions by University of Oregon Teaching Effectiveness Program • Meyer, K. A. (2007). Student perceptions of face-to-face and online discussions: The advantage goes to … Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(4), 53-69. • Newman, D. R., Johnson, C., Cochrane, C., & Webb, B. (1995). A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning. Interpersonal Computing and Technology, 3(2), 56-77. • Zorfass, J., Remz, A., Gold, J., Ethier, D. & Corley, P. (1998).Strategies to ensure that online facilitators are successful
References- pictures • http://www.chaaban.info/2010/03/27/video-conferencing/ • http://blog.venuegen.com/tag/business-best-practices/page/2/ • http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SynchronousLearning.png • http://www.lirs.org/blog/resources/nilc-united-we-stand-share-new-dream-act-policy-faq/attachment/faq-icon • http://www.clker.com/clipart-eiffel-tower-paris.html • http://www.examiner.com/article/diabetes-101-where-can-i-find-the-best-diabetes-forums-blogs-or-discussion-boards • http://effectiveonlineteaching.org/2011/12/07/how-to-design-discussion-forum-questions-that-promote-interaction/ • http://www.bizchickblogs.com/2011/04/use-online-feedback-sources-to-gain-credibility.html • http://info.socious.com/bid/31533/4-Ways-to-Keep-Discussion-Forums-Active-Online-Community-Tips