1 / 16

Priority Prolific Offender Program Alberta, Canada

Priority Prolific Offender Program Alberta, Canada. Solicitor General & Public Security Public Security Division. Priority Prolific Offender Program. Response to Alberta’s Crime Reduction and Safe Communities Task Force recommendation #19:

zubaida
Télécharger la présentation

Priority Prolific Offender Program Alberta, Canada

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Priority Prolific Offender ProgramAlberta, Canada Solicitor General & Public Security Public Security Division

  2. Priority Prolific Offender Program Response to Alberta’s Crime Reduction and Safe Communities Task Force recommendation #19: “take targeted action to address the serious problem of repeat offenders”

  3. Prolific Offender Appears repeatedly before the courts with relatively low-level offences Also known as: chronic, repeat or habitual offenders Continues to offend while on release Offences are not usually confined to one type of crime May have very complex issues & needs Crimes are not necessarily motivated by profit

  4. Why Target Them? Small portion of offenders are responsible for the majority of crime 15% of offenders - 50-60% of all crime Monopolize time & resources Multiple court dates for minor crimes Significantly impact the community Typically receive light sentences

  5. Priority Prolific Offender Program Comprehensive Bail Package Liaise with Crown Co-ordinate Enforcement activities Facilitate wrap around services

  6. Selection Criteria • Frequently committing substantive offences • Committing substantive offences while on release • History of non compliance • Intelligence indicates offender active • Criminal behavior seriously impacts public safety and confidence in justice system • Medium to high risk to reoffend, based on risk assessments or police reports

  7. Discretionary Criteria • Offenders behavior is correlated with addictions/mental health issues • Lack of stable residency and unemployment • Influential with other offenders resulting in criminal behavior amongst associates.

  8. Access to Packages Names flagged on CPIC, JOIN, ACOM, CoMIS, and OMS Contact info listed Intranet Site Package will be e-mailed Future – S: drive or web based

  9. PPOP Process Evaluation • Purpose: to analyze the implementation of the program • Determine effectiveness and use of tracking tools • Satisfaction of stakeholders • Use of rehabilitative services for offenders • Contracted The Canadian Research Institute for Law and the Family (CRILF)

  10. Evaluation Methodology • Best practice literature review • Program Document Analysis • Interviews: Police Officers • Sheriff Investigative Support Unit (SISU) • PPOP Unit Staff • Crown Prosecutors, Defense Counsel, Judges • Treatment/Service Providers • Priority Prolific Offenders

  11. #1 Identify type of offenders referred & assess their views • Stakeholders – selected offenders fit criteria • Offenders – client engagement & voluntary participation important • Appropriate program due to need for monitoring • Benefits of having constant support available • Aids in compliance with conditions • Many report ceasing offending when fully engaged

  12. #2 Examine Implementation & Growth Capacity • Criteria appropriate & used consistently • Too broad, more discretion & community involvement • Consistent referral process not being used • Flagging offenders on databases is helpful • Monitoring – need more resources, more awareness of SISU • CBPs provide complete/accurate information • Beginning to see justice efficiencies • Expansion welcomed

  13. #3 Interventions Received & Experience Accessing Services • PPOP fulfilling role in providing services • Ability to respond quickly • Close communication and information sharing • Large range of services provided • Little delay in receiving but could use more • Dedicate Crown would assist in responding • Formalized partnerships is best practice • Not always in place

  14. #4 Current Data Collection and Future Evaluations • Monthly aggregate program stats collected • Need to establish systematic data collection on individuals • Future evaluations • Monitor & document outcomes and changes to program • Analysis of cost and benefits of program

  15. Conclusions & Recommendations • PPOP is promising and beneficial approach • Recommends: • Development of Operations Manual • Review of Comprehensive Bail Packages • Funding/Resources • Education and Awareness • Process and Outcome Evaluation

  16. PPOP Contact Information Menasha NIKHANJ Manager Desk (780) 638-2877 Menasha.nikhanj@gov.ab.ca Lisa GAGNIER Researcher Desk (780) 644-2786 Lisa.gagnier@gov.ab.ca

More Related