1 / 11

RamRack Conceptual Design Review

RockSat 2008-2009. RamRack Conceptual Design Review. Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor: Dr. Azer Yalin October 28, 2008. Overview.

zuwena
Télécharger la présentation

RamRack Conceptual Design Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. RockSat 2008-2009 RamRackConceptual Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor: Dr. AzerYalin October 28, 2008

  2. Overview • Objective: To develop a sounding rocket payload to act as a power bus, data logger, and mounting structure for future scientific payloads • Overview: • Power bus will be programmable to provide varying voltage supplies depending on need • Data logger will provide a broad range of low level sensor communication and will contain several redundant systems • Design will incorporate several permanent sensors that can be used to monitor conditions of this and future flights • Success Criteria: On this initial flight sensor data will provide data on conditions in the immediate region of the payload as well as to determine the ductility of the frame under stresses • Benefits: This information will be used to create constraints on future experimental payloads

  3. Design • Parts • Mounting Frame • Provides structural support for scientific payload and power and control modules. • Sufficient stiffness for a full can future payload. • Battery Packs • Electronics • Redundant 16 channel A/D 16 bit conversion and dual serial input with data logging capabilities. • 4 GB storage available on MiniSD card. • Real-time system monitoring and control.

  4. Mounting Frame

  5. Batteries • Tenergy Li-Ion • 7.4V • 22000 mAh • 3.2oz • 2.63” x 1.45” x 0.7”

  6. Electronics • ATmega 2561 • Data logging • General I/O • Atmega 168 • System Control • System Monitor • uALFAT-TF • SD card interface • CD74HC4067 • 16-Channel Analog Multiplexer

  7. RockSat 2008-2009 • RockSat Payload Canister User Guide Compliance • Mass: • Estimated use: 2.5lbs • Allotted: 2.5lbs • Volume: • Estimated use: 9” x 2” • Allotted: 9” x 2” • Payload activation • G-switch – no voltage running prior to launch. On launch, G-switch activates latching relay to power electronic systems. • Rocket Interface • Complies with no-volt shorting wire setup.

  8. Logistics • We have contacted the other Colorado schools to plan a meeting. • Looking at the week of November 3rd through the 7th.

  9. Management Team Leader Zach Glueckert Mechanical Engineering Systems Engineer Control Systems Chris Reed Christina Watanuki Zach Glueckert Electrical Engineer Tim Schneider Software Engineer Brendan Sheridan

  10. Budget

  11. Conclusions: • Concerns • Shared canister integration • How to mount three different payloads together • Center of mass/volume with other schools • Mass and volume constraints • Is there any data available on vibrations during two stage rocket launch? • Closing Remarks • Well rounded team • Have the mechanical, electrical and computer backgrounds required to meet project goals • This is a great way to set up CSU for future involvement in RockSAT

More Related