310 likes | 426 Vues
This text explores the intricacies of the policy cycle, focusing on agenda-setting, policy formulation, decision-making, implementation, and evaluation. It discusses the roles of government actors and interest groups, their incentives, and strategies in shaping public policy. Key models, such as Kingdon’s streams model, are utilized to explain how problems, politics, and policies converge to create opportunities for policy change. The analysis emphasizes the significance of social and formal agendas and highlights the resources and objectives that strategic actors leverage to influence policy outcomes.
E N D
Today’s agenda • Policy Cycle • Government actors - incentives • Interest Groups • Interests • Resources • Strategies
Agenda-Setting Policy Formulation Decisionmaking Policy Implementation Monitoring and Evaluation Policy Cycle Model
Agenda-Setting – Definitions • Social Agenda (general, systemic): issues that the public thinks deserve attention from government • measures: polls, media • Formal Agenda (government): issues explicitly up for active and serious consideration by policy makers • measures: announced proposals, throne speech
Agenda-Setting - Process • Kingdon’s “streams” model: a confluence of • Problem stream • Politics stream • Policy (solution) stream • Opens a “policy window” • Opportunity for “policy entrepreneurs”
Agenda-Setting - Process • Changes in “Problem” • indicators • knowledge, technology • focusing event • Changes in “Politics” • changing public mood • elections • interest group strategies
Agenda-Setting Policy Formulation Decisionmaking Policy Implementation Monitoring and Evaluation Policy Cycle Model
Policy Formulation Thinking Talking Consultation with stakeholders • Policy analysis of alternatives
Decision-making rational incrementalism no means-ends distinction alternative search limited to those closest to status quo ignores possible consequences decision rule: “satisfice” test of good policy: agreement successive limited comparisons: trial and error learning • clarify objectives, prioritize them • list all alternatives • assess consequences of alternatives • compare alternatives • choose alternative that maximizes/optimizes objectives
Implementation – conditions for success • Clear, consistent objectives • Sound causal theory • Adequate administrative authority • Committed, skillful implementors • Support from stakeholders • Facilitative socio-economic conditions
Interest groups in context • Strategic actors • Government • Elected officials • Bureaucrats • Non-government interest groups
Government Actors -Interests, Resources: Politicians • resource: authority • Objectives: reelection, policy objectives, power • reelection comes first -- fundamental constraint • effect: public opinion matters
Government Actors –Interests, Resources: Bureaucrats • resources • authority • expertise • objectives • policy objectives • power (budgets, jurisdiction) • autonomy
Interest Groups • energy firms • trade associations • environmental NGOs • aboriginal groups • consumer groups (?) • List of actors
Value orientations 5 - Strong environmental values 3 - neutral 4- Moderate environmental values 1 - Strong pro development values 2 - moderate pro development values On a scale from 1 to 5, with 1 being extremely supportive of energy development and 5 being extremely supportive of environmental conservation, how would you rate your simulation group's values?
Group Resources • money • expertise (substance, process) • skilled leadership (effective, charismatic) • appealing cause • public opinion • contacts • control over investment, jobs
Group Resources – The Privileged Position of Business • control over investment, jobs • government seeks reelection • reelection depends on jobs, healthy economy • jobs, growth created by investment • investment a function of business climate • government constrained from undermining business climate
What resources does your group have to influence public policy?
Actors Strategies – First orderadopt those most likely to advance their interests • lobby • influence public opinion • through media • influence market behaviour • finance elections • litigation • form coalitions • direct action (demonstrations, civil disobedience)
Actors Strategies II – Second Order • change the rules of the game within an arena • Expanding participation • shift the venue to another arena • Legislature to cabinet • Provincial to federal • Domestic to international • Government to market • idea-based strategies to reframe problem • in framing arguments, actors appeal to widely shared values and expert authority • “green jobs”
The politics of science: Classic view: separation Science (facts) Politics (values) Truth
Politics of Science:Recognition of “Trans-science” Jasanoff and Wynne 1998
Politics of ScienceConstructivist View Politics Science
Politics of ScienceConstructivist View (when pressed) Politics Science
Politics and Science • Policy reflects value judgments, but embodies causal assumptions • Causal knowledge frequently very uncertain, undermining power of science • actors adopt the scientific arguments most consistent with their interests • “science” becomes a contested resource for actors in the policy process, by lending credibility to arguments • the body of credible science bounds the range of legitimate arguments, but only loosely
Politics and Science (cont) • Scientific controversies are frequently more about underlying value conflicts • e.g., conservation vs. development
A continuum Regulatory Science: Scientific assumptions adopted for the purpose of policy-making Regulatory Science Politics Science
Regulatory Science Approach • Some causal assumptions are better than others – science helps • Some policies are better reflections of society’s distribution of preferences than others -- democratic institutions help • Avoid: political decisions made by scientists and scientific judgments being made by politicians • Prefer: transparent justification for decisions • Reveals boundary where scientific advice ends and value judgments begins • Promotes accountability