1 / 28

Laurie Mets Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology The University of Chicago Fermi Lab, March 16, 2002

Genetic Engineering and Food. How can we understand the impact of science on what we eat?. Laurie Mets Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology The University of Chicago Fermi Lab, March 16, 2002. Nutritional Energy (calories) Essential nutrients Appealing Flavor Appearance Not harmful.

Angelica
Télécharger la présentation

Laurie Mets Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology The University of Chicago Fermi Lab, March 16, 2002

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Genetic Engineering and Food How can we understand the impact of science on what we eat? Laurie Mets Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology The University of Chicago Fermi Lab, March 16, 2002

  2. Nutritional Energy (calories) Essential nutrients Appealing Flavor Appearance Not harmful Highly productive agriculture Genetic Engineering impacts each of these properties of plants (and animals) Good Food at a Good Price

  3. What is “Genetic Engineering?” • “Genetic engineering focuses on the manipulation (blocking, adding, or scrambling) of the genetic material (the DNA) inside the cells of living organisms to block or add desired traits.” www.wholefoodsmarket.com • Modification of the genetic makeup of organisms by man • Cross-breeding and progeny selection • Plant A fertilized with pollen from plant B • Molecular genetic engineering • Enabling technology - not intrinsically harmful; not intrinsically beneficial

  4. Genetic Engineering is an Ancient Art • Darwin – variation is much higher in domesticated species than in wild species • Braidwood – time and place of domestication can be traced to location of increased variation • Bruce D. Smith – times and sites of domestication correspond to the origins of organized civilizations • Variations under domestication represent changes in the genetic composition of the organisms associated with man’s activities

  5. Best Invention of the Millenium- NY Times Magazine, 4/19/99 “How the bean saved civilization” - Umberto Eco Prof of Semiotics, Univ. of Bologna

  6. Examples of engineered species • Wheat (Triticum aestivum) - a man-made species • Corn (Zea mays) - derived from teosinte • Soybeans (Glycine max) - from G. soja • Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) - wild varieties are toxic None of the food varieties can grow without help from man

  7. The Development of Genetic Engineering Techniques • Darwin - models for understanding the role of selection • Mendel - mathematical models for predicting the outcome of cross-breeding • Beadle (et al) - how genes determine the chemical composition of organisms • Watson & Crick - general model for DNA structure • Cohen & Boyer – DNA splicing leads to artificial “transgenic” organisms

  8. Agrobacterium • A soil bacterium that generates transgenic plants • Transfers some of its genes to the plant • Causes “gall” growths and forces the plant to make nutrients for it • Use by human molecular genetic engineers: • genes that the bacterium transfers are replaced by others • e.g. BT toxin for pest resistance; herbicide degrading enzymes for herbicide resistance; enzymes to alter fatty acid composition or add nutrients (Golden rice) • Host range has been modified for engineering monocot crops like rice and corn

  9. Virtual Engineering Projects • What property of an organism would you like to change? • How might that property be controlled by genes? • What specific steps must be taken to accomplish the engineering? • Assessment: what are the social impacts – both intended and unintended?

  10. Molecular anatomy of a gene

  11. Unicellular organism Multicellular organism

  12. “From Alchemy to Algeny” “The very thought of recombining living material into an infinite number of new combinations is so extraordinary that the human mind is barely able to grasp the immensity of the transition at hand” Jeremy Rifkin, The Biotech Century Like the theories underlying alchemy, this analysis is based upon a faulty scientific model. What can be engineered is limited by physical and genetic realities.

  13. Science provides tools and models Valuation requires social and political processes

  14. What should be genetically engineered? • Why should it be engineered? • Who should be involved in the discussion? • How should the discussion be conducted?

  15. Problem:The pace of change enabled by modern genetic engineering is outstripping the ability of cultural traditions and institutions to assist in the evaluation of foods

  16. “Public aceptance of foods [from transgenic plants] ultimately depends on the credibility of the testing and regulatory process…” Dr. Perry Adkisson April 5, 2000 in introducing public release of the National Research Council report on “Genetically Modified Pest-Protected Plants: Science and Regulation”

  17. How does genetic engineering affect agricultural practice? • Traditional cross-breeding for commodity markets is a numbers game that will always be dominated by the largest players • Engineering of added value traits should create specialty niche products, subdividing commodity markets and creating opportunities for smaller scale players

  18. Why is the organic farming industry opposed to “Genetic Engineering?” • Organic farming accesses a niche market of consumers who want to avoid potential exposure to agricultural chemicals • Genetic methods that could obviate the use of chemicals in traditional agriculture represent a threat to that niche

  19. From www.wholefoodsmarket.com“Unintended Consequences of Agricultural Biotechnology” Antibiotic resistance. The use of antibiotic resistant “marker” genes risks the transfer of antibiotic resistance into humans and the environment, diminishing the effectiveness of the antibiotics. Antibiotics in common use for marker selection: G418; Kanamycin

  20. From www.wholefoodsmarket.com“Unintended Consequences of Agricultural Biotechnology” Allergies. The effect known as antiidiotope allergen. Cummins in “Genetic Engineered Foods and Allergenicity” states that “When an antibody is made against an antigen (allergen) there is an antibody made against the antibody (antiidiotope antibody). Most genetically engineered crops have genes for antibiotic tolerance, which produce enzymes that match an allergenic antibiotic. The enzymes will produce antibodies that are allergens. Thus most genetically engineered crops are likely to be allergenic to people sensitive to antibiotics.” Antibiotics in common use for marker selection: G418; Kanamycin

  21. What lies in the future? • Modern gene transfer engineering makes smaller, more defined changes than traditional cross-breeding methods • Genomic approaches to marker-assisted breeding promise to make engineering by cross-breeding more efficient and precise

  22. Comparative Physical Mapping

  23. Microbial Community Assessment Vancomycin resistant enterococci from produce - lateral transfer or selected strains? with Raj Sinha, Chicago State Univ.

  24. Civilization itself depends upon genetic engineering Techniques are becoming more powerful and technical outcomes more predictable Use of engineering requires thought

More Related