1 / 49

National HMO Network – 12th October 2010

National HMO Network – 12th October 2010. Workshop A – Using the HHSRS to achieve improvements in HMOs and Flat conversions Dave Beach and Rob Sale. Aims and objectives. Review the legislative framework in which the HHSRS used to improve HMOs

acervantes
Télécharger la présentation

National HMO Network – 12th October 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. National HMO Network – 12th October 2010 Workshop A – Using the HHSRS to achieve improvements in HMOs and Flat conversions Dave Beach and Rob Sale

  2. Aims and objectives • Review the legislative framework in which the HHSRS used to improve HMOs • Look at the practical issues faced by Enforcement officers – Excess Cold • Use your responses to the questionnaire to highlight issues and to promote discussion • Inform policy development and good working practices in the use of the HHSRS to improve HMO conditions

  3. HHSRS in HMOs – key factors • Getting HHSRS assessments right • Using enforcement tools correctly • Having an appropriate Enforcement Policy • Achieving improvements that are appropriate to reduce/remove the hazards and provide suitable HMO accommodation

  4. HMO HHSRS assessments overview • HHSRS not originally aimed at bedsits • HHSRS assessed in relation to “dwellings” • “Dwelling” includes non self-contained bedsit-type accommodation with shared amenities

  5. HMO HHSRS Assessments Overview (cont.) • HHSRS relies on comparisons with the “average” situation • For defects/hazards that are considered worse than average, go through scoring process (NB Excess Cold) • The average likelihoods, harm outcomes and hazard scores (annex D) are intended to represent “typical” conditions for dwelling of given type/age

  6. HMO HHSRS Assessments Overview (cont.) • The Hazard Profiles (Annex D) are split into up to 8 different ages and types of dwelling • A number of these are split into “Non HMOs” and “HMOs”, including Excess Cold and Food Safety • “HMO” category - includes self contained converted flats as well as HMO bedsit accommodation

  7. HHSRS HMO assessments – comparison with “average” • HMO bedsits form small proportion of their dwelling/age groups (annex D) • Inherent physical differences between typical bedsits and other dwellings grouped together for HHSRS • Meaningful comparisons with “average” therefore difficult e.g. amenity sharing

  8. HHSRS HMO assessments – comparison with “average” • Excess cold – “average” bedsit has poorer heating than average flat but it is smaller and has less external wall area – need to appreciate differences but relate any defects to actual or perceived risks in generating scores • Overall approach to all Excess Cold assessments the same but risk assessments must be relevant and individual to each dwelling • National averages for guidance

  9. HHSRS – Improvement notices • LA’s have duty to deal with category 1 hazards and a power to deal with category 2 hazards • HHSRS assessments on individual bedsits but improvement notices served on “residential premises”; includes “a dwelling” and “an HMO” • Single Improvement notice can specify action to deal with category 1 and 2 hazards on same premises

  10. HHSRS – Improvement notices (cont.) Improvement notices must state: - • Whether served under s11 or s12 • The nature of the hazard and the residential premises on which it exists • Details of the remedial action

  11. Importance of hazard score and band in current legislative framework • Defects in HMOs are likely to impact upon individual bedsits in different ways, generating different scores/bands • The hazard score and band dictates range of enforcement options • Classification as category 1 or category 2 is important in terms of local enforcement policies, particularly if seeking “whole house” improvements

  12. HHSRS in HMOs – linking hazards to bedsits Falls between levels hazard affecting top bedsits. Falls on stairs hazard affecting all bedsits

  13. HHSRS in HMOs – linking hazards to bedsits Questionnaire: - • HMO arranged as bedsits – how would HHSRS assessments be made? • HMO assessed for Fire found to generate a mix of category 1 and 2 hazards for different bedsits – how would this be reflected in content of any Improvement Notice served?

  14. Hazard assessment process for Fire in HMOs

  15. Content of Improvement Notice

  16. HHSRS in HMOs – linking hazards to bedsits • Not necessarily a right or wrong way – no RPT decisions • Key is probably consistency • Choice of s11, s12 or combined Improvement Notice consistent with hazards/bands identified • Schedules of work consistent with powers used and local enforcement policies

  17. Enforcement policy - Which of the following best describes your authority’s enforcement policy as regards HHSRS?

  18. HHSRS – local authority enforcement policiesrelating to category 1 and2 hazards • No minimum threshold for enforcement, but • 62% of respondents indicated that there were local restrictions on enforcement • When dealing with hazards/defects that would benefit from “whole house” solutions, take account of any local policy restrictions

  19. Excess Cold in HMOs – Assessment and Specification • Annex D guidance – greater risk of harm from dwellings with low energy efficiency • Some occupancy factors but dwelling characteristics are key • Energy efficiency depends upon thermal insulation of structure, fuel type and size & design of means of heating and ventilation

  20. Energy Efficiency Principles • Heat/Energy ‘balance’ • Temperature gradient • Minimise heatloss • Fabric, Ventilation • Maximise incidental heat gain • Minimise space heating (h/w) ‘top up’ • Maximise plant efficiency • Emissions, affordability • ‘U – values’ (W/m2oC) • ‘Rate per unit area per degree temperature difference) • 0.35 good, 6 bad!

  21. Heatloss

  22. Example U- values

  23. Excess Cold – The “Average”

  24. Excess Cold – the “Average”

  25. Bedsits – Excess cold overview

  26. Excess Cold and SAP • Approved methodology for energy performance of buildings (£/m2, CO2) • Some correlation between SAP and measured living room and bedroom temperatures (NB 40 – 60, Warm Front Study) • Standard location, heating pattern, occupancy • Incomplete picture of particular dwelling • Increased complexity and expense • Difficult to apply to ‘HMO’s’ • ‘Proxy rating of 35 for Cat 1 hazard for ‘Decent Home’ • Useful tool to support Hazard Assessment but not replace it • Reinforce confidence not provide it – eg. gas v electric heating (Illie and Prochazka v Haringey, 2010)

  27. Excess Cold in HMOs – Improvement Objectives • Balanced/appropriate heating/insulation & ventilation • Residents to have access to controls to regulate temperature in each bedsit • Residents to benefit from dwelling that is adequately and efficiently heated • These temperatures available for defined period • Improvements defined in terms of ‘reasonable’ (acceptable) cost • ‘pay back’ • Investment • Affordable warmth

  28. Space heating in HMOs Gas or electric? Central heating or individual room heaters? • What is the preferred method of space heating in HMOs? • What other systems can also be considered? • Key caveats and conditions affecting acceptability of different systems • ‘Inappropriate or inefficient’ • Inadequate size’

  29. Space heating in HMOs

  30. Space Heating in HMOs – Central Heating • Favoured option – preferred option of 82% respondents, considered by other 18% Caveats/conditions highlighted: • Controllability – tenants access to TRVs • Heating extended to common parts • Building insulation – particularly loft But although preferred option, central heating only required in HMOs by 32% respondent Local Authorities

  31. Space Heating in HMOs – Central Heating

  32. Space Heating in HMOs – Central Heating • Varying experiences/difficulties experienced in asking for Central heating (NB Low numbers!) • Where problems experienced, discussion and debate with landlord most popular option to resolve – also Licensing conditions Possible discussion items: - • Why are more authorities not asking for central heating in bedsit HMOs? • If not central heating, what heating systems are being installed?

  33. Space Heating in HMOs – Storage Heaters • Favoured option of small number of authorities. Preferred/accepted by 84% respondents Caveats/conditions highlighted: • Access to off peak supply • Modern storage heaters (convectors) • Access to heaters for on peak boost • Effective building insulation – loft and wall

  34. Space Heating in HMOs – Gas Room Heaters • Not a favoured option but accepted by 58% respondents Caveats/conditions highlighted: • Room sealed appliances • Provision to heat any shared areas • Building insulation - loft • Modern, efficient, programmable appliances

  35. Space Heating in HMOs – Fixed Electric Room Heaters • Not a favoured option but accepted by 74% respondents Caveats/conditions highlighted: • Modern appliances with timer/thermostat • Building insulation • Affordability • Efficient enough to be economically viable

  36. Space heating in HMOs – guidelines and discussion points • Difficult to rule out any particular fuel/system – need to consider options on an individual basis • Gas central heating – are practical issues (control etc) but can be overcome. Likely to be most cost effective option. • Room heaters – refer to manufacturer’s instructions/specifications. Some room heaters only suitable for use in well insulated buildings (walls and roof) . Storage heaters unsuitable for small bedsits

  37. Heating – general conclusions • Heating to every room, include shared bathrooms and common parts in bedsits • Preference for gas where no central heating – Part L • Consider dwelling size • Gas boilers: • 67% efficient (average), around 15 years old, ‘obsolete’, poor repair record - consider replacement • D rated (78% plus) above average BUT NB assess individual case: • M Fearon v LB Newham (HMO, tests, hot water costs) • Irene Thompson v Newcastle under Lyme, 2008 (Age alone insufficient)

  38. Heating – general conclusions Electric Systems: • DOM 8: Guide to the Design of Electric Space Heating Systems • Domestic Heating by Electricity: CE185 (Energy Savings Trust, 2006) • Mix of storage and direct acting heaters with electronic thermostat and timer • Integrated storage/direct systems • Direct acting heaters • Central controls? CELECT, ‘Credanet’ • Consider appropriate package of insulation

  39. Excess Cold – difficult to treat insulation issues

  40. Excess Cold; Heating –v- Insulation • Generally will cost more to heat a bedsit using electricity than gas • In HMOs where electricity is main fuel, insulation is key to minimising heat loss • Most HMOs in older buildings will therefore need significantly improved insulation (wall and roof) in order to make storage or modern fixed electric room heaters economically viable

  41. Excess Cold; Heating –v- Insulation When to insulate walls? • Generally specify cavity wall insulation where possible (funding available) • Solid wall – size of bedsit, number of external surfaces. Use of SAP to calculate running costs with/without insulation • Pledream Properties Ltd v Camden, 2010 • 2 back addition bedsits • ‘large area of external wall in comparison to floor area’ • Storage heating • Extensive other works • Practicability – Large amount of other works, particularly where plaster removed Part L, listing • Should not reduce floor area by more than 5% - best achievable

  42. Excess Cold; Heating –v- Insulation • When to insulate attic rooms/mansards/flat roofs? • Works more expensive and disruptive • Consider use of rooms below • Most likely where roof renewal required (specify ‘from above’) • Where not the case, either take down ceilings/walls and insulate between joists rafters or ‘overboard with thermal board with vapour barrier • See Bristol Worked example March 2007 • Appropriate with electric heating and ‘inefficient’ gas boiler but less important with condensing boiler? • Consider in conjunction with Excess Heat hazard (‘attic room’, restricted ventilation)

  43. Excess Cold; Heating –v- Insulation Possible discussion items: - • How prescriptive are local authorities when asking for Excess Cold hazards to be removed ? • Do work schedules offer a range of possible improvement (heating/insulation) options? • Where electric room heaters are identified as a possible option in older buildings, is the improvement of insulation standards a qualifying requirement? • Should single glazed windows be changed to reduce heat loss?

  44. Excess Cold – Specification of Double glazing

  45. Double/secondary Glazing • ‘Poorer value for money for reducing risk’ (Bristol) • Not normally recommended as improvement on EPC • Relevant factors: • draughts as well as heat loss through glazing – can be reduced via draft-proofing • ‘radiant’ heat loss • disrepair • ‘larger than average pane size’ (at least 30%, preferably over 50% of external wall)

  46. Double/secondary Glazing • RPT: Lindsay-Taylor v Camden, 2007: • Gas heating and double glazing (gas not challenged) • ‘Modest dimensions’ – only two exposed elevations, no b/a or flanks • Flat below and loft insulation • Windows in good condition (minor repair) • Centre terrace, E/W elevation,sheltered • ‘numerous other situations where (double glazing) will be appropriate • Secondary glazing in Listed Buildings • Affect on other elements (walls) • Standard – see Part L1B

  47. Discussion points from RPT Decisions • Landlord can choose preferred heating system - not appropriate for LA to dictate type/fuel for heating system (unless demonstrate inadequacy of alternatives) • Temperature range of 21 deg C when outside –1 deg C excessive based OG reference to ‘small risk’ below 19 deg C • Need for additional insulation, mainly in form of double/secondary glazing, accepted in cases of storage heating (NB not necessarily most cost effective insulation option!) • Affordability to the occupier is a relevant consideration but actual evidence of costs of different options required • ‘Trap’ of failing to assess actual risk, average likelihoods/scores a guide only

  48. HHSRS and HMOs – messages to take from the workshop and discussion points • Assessment process for some hazards in HMOs using HHSRS can be complex • Enforcement using part 1 powers has potential to be problematic and bureaucratic • Adoption of local enforcement policies that are not too restrictive gives more flexibility in achieving comprehensive improvements

  49. HHSRS and HMOs – messages to take from the workshop and discussion points • The numbers in the OG are, at best, to be used to guide judgments but assessments must be individual and relevant to each unit • For Excess Cold hazards, local authorities need to consider an appropriate package of heating and insulation, providing “affordable warmth”. Energy efficiency is a relatively new area of work for EHPs and some additional guidance may be needed regarding the specification of works and collecting/presenting evidence against appeals

More Related