1 / 7

Maria Carolina Rozo V. 20042165057 Gustavo Adolfo Bolaños M. 20041165045

Maria Carolina Rozo V. 20042165057 Gustavo Adolfo Bolaños M. 20041165045. A look on cross linguistic differences in short compositions.

alisa
Télécharger la présentation

Maria Carolina Rozo V. 20042165057 Gustavo Adolfo Bolaños M. 20041165045

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Maria Carolina Rozo V. 20042165057 Gustavo Adolfo Bolaños M. 20041165045 A look on cross linguistic differences in short compositions

  2. Students from 11th grade at Miguel Antonio Caro School write in English, they write as if they were writing in Spanish, showing an evidence of interference. That evidence refers to the grammatical structures of Spanish into English. This interference makes their writings difficult to read and understand which means that cross linguistic influence is present in their writings. According to this, we want to describe how that influence affects students’ composition outcome.

  3. Research objectives • General • to describe the way cross-linguistic differences affect students’ composition outcome. Specific • To characterize the major cross linguistic influences which affect students’ compositions • To analyze the role of pair work activities in the composition process

  4. Paradigm Mixed Research Approach Mixed model Research (Johnson and Christensen, 2008) Participants 35 students from 11th grade at Miguel Antonio Caro School

  5. David W. Johnson, Roger T. Johnson, Edythe Holubec, 2009 Johanne Myles, 2002 John M. Lannon, 2007 Odlin, 2004 Ellis, 1994 Freeman, 1999 Littlewood, 1998

  6. DATA COLLECTION Students’ samples Questionnaires

  7. REFERENCES • Johanne Myles (2002). Second Language Writing and Research: The Writing Process and Error Analysis in Student Texts. • Roger T. Johnson, Edythe Holubec (2009). The Newsletter ofThe Cooperative Learning Institute. Volume 24. Issue 1. David W. Johnson. • John M. Lannon (2003).The writing Process: A Concise Rhetoric, Reader, and Handbook. • Johnson, burke & Christensen Larry (2004) Educational Research. • Littlewood, William (1998) Foreign and second language learning. Cambridge University Press • Freeman, Diane &Long Michael (1999) An introduction to second language acquisition Research. Logman, New York • Odlin, Terence (1998) Language Transfer- Cross linguistic influence in language learning, Cambridge University Press • Rod, Ellis (1994) The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.

More Related