1 / 42

Case Rounds November 29, 2010

Case Rounds November 29, 2010. Chris Kuchta, PT,SCS,CSCS Director of Aquatics PRO Physical Therapy Wilmington, DE Chris.Kuchta@propt.com. Initial Evaluation. 17 y/o male high school soccer player No prior injury; negative medical history Referred to PT by primary MD

ally
Télécharger la présentation

Case Rounds November 29, 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Case Rounds November 29, 2010 Chris Kuchta, PT,SCS,CSCS Director of Aquatics PRO Physical Therapy Wilmington, DE Chris.Kuchta@propt.com

  2. Initial Evaluation • 17 y/o male high school soccer player • No prior injury; negative medical history • Referred to PT by primary MD • ‘R hip pain, eval & tx’ • Injury occurred approximately 2 weeks prior • Sprinting to ball, clipped toe of another player and subsequently tripped and fell to ground • Had immediate pain and took himself out of the game • Walked off the field • Currently 0/10 pain at rest, 10/10 attempting sports activities

  3. Initial Evaluation • The basics • When – Approximately 2 weeks ago • Where – Pt. generally rubs his right flank, and is unable to point to a specific cause of his pain with one finger • How – Unfortunately he does not remember if the injury occurred while sprinting or falling/landing • What else would you like to know about the patient?

  4. Initial Evaluation • Activities that worsen sx: • Coughing and sneezing • Twisting and turning, such as rolling over in bed and getting out of car • Any attempts at sports activity • Improve sx: • Advil • Relative rest

  5. Initial Evaluation • X-Rays negative • No bruising or abrasions noticed • Hasn’t been limping • No “red flags”

  6. Question # 1 • Blood in the urine after trauma usually indicates • A. Kidney stones • B. Urinary tract infection • C. Injury to the urogential system • D. None of the above

  7. Initial Evaluation • What sport-specific questions are pertinent to this case?

  8. Initial Evaluation • What position does he play? • Is he in-season? • If so, how much of the season is left? • Is he only playing for his high school? • What is his dominant (kicking) leg? • Is he responsible for throw-ins? • Is he currently playing another sport?

  9. Question # 2 • Based on the patient’s chief complaint of R flank pain, what structures may refer to this area? A. Ribs 4-7 B. Shaft of the femur C. 11-12th Thoracic nerve root D. Pubic symphysis

  10. Initial Evaluation • Lower T-spine and upper L-spine nerve roots can refer to hip and/or flank region • Note that a standard pelvic X-Ray may not show those levels

  11. Initial Evaluation • What is your hypothesis and why? • What objective tests would you like to perform and why?

  12. Objective Data Hip Outcome Score • ADL 62%, Sports 12% • Scale 0-100, lower scores indicate more disability • Global rating ADL 80%, Sports 0% • Corresponds with subjective report • Observations • No limp • No ecchymosis or swelling hip or flank

  13. PROM R L Trunk AROM Lumbopelvic screen (-) Fwd flexion – tip of 3rd finger 18cm from floor Extension – full, mild deviation to the right R lat flexion 40cm L lat flexion 51cm w 4/10 ‘pulling’ flank pain Max open of R and max closing L both 4/10 pain Objective Data

  14. Strength R L Objective Data Kendall’s DLLT Lost PPT with pain @ 75

  15. Special Tests • Thomas test + • Slightly more rectus tightness R vs L • 2/10 pain testing R • Obers test revealed bilat ITB tightness • 2/10 pain testing R • Faber, Scour, segmental spring testing of T10-L5 all negative, dermatomes intact

  16. Question # 3 • Patient is tender 1cm proximal to ASIS on the R. What muscle could this be? A. Rectus Abdominus B. Sartorius C. Oblique Externus Abdominus D. Quadratus Lumborum

  17. Objective Data • Palpation: • R rectus abdominus negative • Diffusely TTP R oblique vs L, distal third mm mass 4/10 pain • How can we try to isolate? • L S/L over pillows, ask pt to perform a side ‘crunch’ (i.e. Activate against gravity) • Result – 3/10 pulling pain in the start position, 8/10 upon attempting to ‘crunch’- test stopped

  18. Assessment • Why did he have pain with max opening/closing? • Why was coughing/sneeing, resisted R hip abd provocative? • What is your PT diagnosis???

  19. Assessment • PT diagnosis R external oblique strain

  20. Plan of Care • What are the patient’s impairments?

  21. Plan of Care • What are your goals?

  22. Plan of Care • What should be in the plan of care? • How can we effectively implement a plan of care when the patient has up to 10/10 pain?

  23. Plan of Care • Welcome to the world of Aquatic Physical Therapy!

  24. Question # 4 • What water temperature will be appropriate for whole body immersion to facilitate muscle relaxation and pain relief for aquatic therapy? • A. 115 degrees F • B. 68 degrees F • C. 92 degrees F • D. 34 degrees F

  25. Plan of Care • Benefits • Warm water (92 degrees F) • Facilitates flexibility/mobility • Decreases pain sensitivity/mm spasm • Bouyancy • Based on level of immersion, can drastically decrease axial compression/stresses • Eliminate gravitational load from extremities – facilitate mobility and sport-specific movements • Resistance in all directions • Can easily implement dynamic movements early in POC, safely challenge problem areas later on

  26. Plan of Care • Initial aquatic activities in straight planes, progressive challenge to core • Use buoyancy and surface tension to effectively restore mobility and flexibility of the involved area • Add rotational/multiplanar motions to tolerance • Sport-specific motions

  27. Acute Aquatic Management

  28. Plan of Care

  29. Plan of Care

  30. Plan of Care

  31. Plan of Care • After first pool treatment : “dude, there’s no way I could do that out there (on land)”

  32. Question # 5 • What other differential dx might you suspect if pain persisted or worsened during treatment (buoyancy did not help)? • “sports hernia” • T-11 pars interarticularis fx • Osteitis pubis • All of the above

  33. Reassessment At IE At re-check

  34. Reassessment • We decide to keep him in the pool • Pool program revamped to include more challenge to external obliques and incorporate sport-specific movements.

  35. Plan of Care

  36. Plan of Care

  37. Plan of Care

  38. Plan of Care • Functional testing • Performed in pool first

  39. Consider his injury and sport in choosing functional progression Plan of Care

  40. Plan of Care • Pt’s only complaint was 1-2/10 pulling type pain R flank with corner abdominal series, specifically reverse curl-up with R rotation. • After 8 aquatic treatments, we now decide he is ready for formal re-evaluation on land.

  41. Formal Re-Evaluation Test Deficit • No c/o pain during testing • DLLT to 40 degrees, 1/10 R oblique pain • Based on aquatic progression and objective findings, we decide to transition to land

  42. Plan of Care • As of 11/23, pt continues to progress well and is on his way to accomplishing PT and his own goals of full participation in indoor soccer. Any other questions? Thank you

More Related