1 / 31

Casualty Actuaries in Reinsurance Property Per Risk Reinsurance

Casualty Actuaries in Reinsurance Property Per Risk Reinsurance. Glenn Meyers Insurance Services Office, Inc. June 2-3, 2003. ISO’s PSOLD Product. Underlying data – Commercial property claims reported to ISO during 1991-2000 Separate mixed exponential curves fit by:

aloomis
Télécharger la présentation

Casualty Actuaries in Reinsurance Property Per Risk Reinsurance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Casualty Actuaries in ReinsuranceProperty Per Risk Reinsurance Glenn Meyers Insurance Services Office, Inc. June 2-3, 2003

  2. ISO’s PSOLD Product • Underlying data – Commercial property claims reported to ISO during 1991-2000 • Separate mixed exponential curves fit by: • Amount of insurance groups • Occupancy group • Subline • Coverage (Building, Contents, Building + Contents, All Causes of Loss) • Previously discussed 2000 CARe meeting http://www.casact.org/coneduc/reinsure/2000/handouts/meyers1.ppt • Will not repeat the entire presentation here • Talk about demographic features

  3. Sample Input for AOI Ranges

  4. Sample Input for State and Occupancy

  5. The Mixed Exponential Size of Loss Distribution • i’s vary by subline and coverage • wi’s vary by AOI and occupancy group in addition to subline and coverage

  6. The Mixed Exponential Size of Loss Distribution • i = mean of the ith exponential distribution • For higher i’s, a higher severity class will tend to have higher wi’s.

  7. The Classification Data Availability Problem • Focus on Reinsurance Treaties • Primary insurers report data in bulk to reinsurers • Property values in building size ranges • Some classification, state and deductible information • Reinsurers can use ISO demographic information to estimate effect of unreported data.

  8. Thought Experiment • Consider a database with • Amount of Insurance - AOI • State • Occupancy Group • Loss Amount • Select records that satisfy criteria – e.g. • AOI between X and Y • State = Tennessee • Apartments • Construct empirical size of loss distribution • Credibility problems

  9. Database Behind PSOLD 120,000+ records (for each coverage/line combination) containing: • Severity model parameters • Amount of insurance group • 60 AOI groups • Occupancy class group • State • Number of claims applicable to the record

  10. Constructing a Size of Loss Distribution Consistent with Available Data Using ISO Demographic Data • Select relevant data • Selection criteria can include: • Occupancy Class Group(s) • Amount of Insurance Range(s) • State(s) • Supply premium for each selection • Each state has different AOI and occupancy/class demographics

  11. Constructing a Size of Loss Distribution for a “Selection” • Record output - Layer Average Severity • Combine all records in selection: • LASSelection = Wt Average(LASRecords) • Use the record’s claim count as weights

  12. Constructing a Size of Loss Distribution for a “Selection” Where: i = ith overall weight parameter wij= ith weight parameter for the jth record Cj= Claim weight for the jth record

  13. Case 1 – Very Limited Information • All occupancy classes • All amounts of insurance • All states Case 2 – State Information • All occupancy classes • All amounts of insurance • Tennessee only

  14. Differences due to state demographics by occupancy and AOI

  15. The Combined Size of LossDistribution for Several “Selections” • Claim Weights for a “selection” are proportional to Premium Claim Severity • LASCombined = Wt Average(LASSelection) • Using the “selection” total claim weights • The definition of a “selection” is flexible

  16. The Combined Size of LossDistribution for Several “Selections” • Calculate i’s for groups for which you have pure premium information. • Calculate the average severity for jth group

  17. The Combined Size of LossDistribution for Several “Selections” • Calculate the group claim weights • Calculate the weights for the treaty size of loss distribution

  18. Case 1 – Very Limited Information • All occupancy classes • All amounts of insurance • All states Case 3 – AOI Information • All occupancy classes • Different AOI Groups • 50% under $250K • 30% between $250K and $500K • 20% over $500K • All States

  19. Differences due to more specific AOI information

  20. Sample Input for AOI Ranges Put in a lot of selections PSOLD demographics fill in within the selections

  21. Sample Input for State and Occupancy Can specify state and class within each selection

  22. The Deductible Problem • Most property insurance is sold with a deductible • A lot of different deductibles • PSOLD has ground up size of loss distribution as well as size of loss distributions net of deductibles

  23. Size of Loss Distributions Net of Deductibles • Combine over all deductibles LASCombined Post Deductible Equals Wt Average(LASSpecific Deductible) • Weights are the number of claims over each deductible.

  24. Size of Loss Distributions Net of Deductibles For an exponential distribution: Net severity Need only adjust frequency -- i.e. wi’s

  25. Adjusting the wi’s • Djjth deductible amount • ij • Wi = Weighted Average gij’s

  26. Case 4 = Case 1 Ground Up

  27. Summary • PSOLD allows you to use whatever information you do have • Amount of insurance (limits profile) • Occupancy class group • State • Deductible • PSOLD demographic information provides a default to use when you do not get information on reinsurance treaties.

  28. A Major Departure from Traditional Property Size of Loss Tabulations • Tabulate by dollars of insured value • Traditionally, property size of loss distributions have been tabulated by % of insured value.

  29. Fitted $ Average Severity against Insured Value

  30. Fitted Average Severity as % of Insured Value Blow up this area

  31. Fitted Average Severity as % of Insured Value Eventually, assuming that loss distributions based on a percentage of AOI will produce layer costs that are too high.

More Related