1 / 30

Casualty Actuaries in Reinsurance

Casualty Actuaries in Reinsurance. Observations on Medical Malpractice. James D. Hurley, ACAS, MAAA May 20, 2008. This document is incomplete without the accompanying discussion; it is confidential and intended solely for the information and benefit of the immediate recipient hereof.

hedy
Télécharger la présentation

Casualty Actuaries in Reinsurance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Casualty Actuaries in Reinsurance Observations on Medical Malpractice James D. Hurley, ACAS, MAAA May 20, 2008 This document is incomplete without the accompanying discussion; it is confidential and intended solely for the information and benefit of the immediate recipient hereof.

  2. Observations on Medical Malpractice • Financial results • Reinsurance issues • What’s different . . . or not?

  3. Observations on Medical Malpractice • Financial results impacted by . . . • 1990’s • modest loss trends • favorable reserve development • relatively high investment returns • expansion • slippage in pricing • 2000’s • loss trends pick up • unfavorable reserve development • investment returns turn • rates adjusted Continued . . .

  4. Observations on Medical Malpractice (cont.) • 2003  2006 • rates/prices tight • tort reform • loss trends • investment returns stabilize • 2007  20?? • rates reduced • tort reforms “+“ • loss trends • investment returns “return” (some)

  5. Observations on Medical Malpractice Source: A.M. Best’s Aggregates and Averages

  6. Observations on Medical Malpractice Source: Compilation of Best Data

  7. Observations on Medical Malpractice Source: Compilation of Best Data

  8. Observations on Medical Malpractice Source: Compilation of Best Data

  9. Observations on Medical Malpractice Source: Compilation of Best Data

  10. Observations on Medical Malpractice Source: Compilation of Best Data

  11. Observations on Medical Malpractice Source: Compilation of Best Data

  12. Observations on Medical Malpractice Source: Compilation of Best Data

  13. Observations on Medical Malpractice Source: Compilation of Best Data

  14. Observations on Medical Malpractice Source: Compilation of Best Data

  15. Observations on Medical Malpractice Source: Compilation of Best Data

  16. Observations on Medical Malpractice Source: Compilation of Best Data

  17. Observations on Medical Malpractice Source: Compilation of Best Data

  18. Observations on Medical Malpractice • Reinsurance Issues • Reinsurance attestation • risk transfer • NAIC survey • Proposed rule – New Jersey • reporting requirements

  19. Observations on Medical Malpractice • Market needs  some divergence • start-ups • capacity • avoid early “knock-out” • mature companies • clash • ECO/EPL

  20. Observations on Medical Malpractice • What’s different . . . or not? • rules • rates • results • capacity • other?

  21. What’s different . . . or not?  “Rules” • Florida  proposed SB 1660 • consumer protection laws apply to insurance • more rigorous requirements on experience rating individual physicians and schedule rating generally • ALAE/DCC shall be part of insurer’s “rate base” only to extent they do not exceed “. . . the national average for such expenses, as determined by the office, for the prior calendar year . . .” • Requires (apparently) a Florida income statement • policies effective on/after October 1, 2007, rates shall be 25% less than rates at October 1, 2004

  22. What’s different . . . or not?  “Rules” • Florida  proposed SB 1660 (cont.) • insurer/self-insurer or RRG filing a proposed rate change • must give notice to public • any insured can request a hearing within 30 days (any consumer may participate) • public counsel has standing to request hearing • med mal rates cannot be based on experience for 2003 and prior

  23. What’s different . . . or not?  “Rules” • Colorado  SB 164 (proposed 2008) • “guts” the non-economic cap • “. . . no rate shall be held to be inadequate unless surplus falls below . . .” company action level RBC • Similar RBC related proposals in Rhode Island, D.C. • Other states debating/changing “rules” • California (all lines) • Ohio – file annually • Missouri – recent legislation requires new “rules” • Illinois – fully documented filings

  24. What’s different . . . or not?  “Rates” Percentage of Rate Changes in Survey by Range* *October 2007 Medical Liability Monitor

  25. What’s different . . . or not?  “Rates” • Comments on the survey • “repositioning” changes? • number of rate increases down by 50% • 50% show “no change”; 30% reflect decreases • opportunity to get class/territory right • manual changes; not collected • tracking and balanced?

  26. What’s different . . . or not?  “Results” 26

  27. What’s different . . . or not?  “Capacity” 27

  28. What’s different . . . or not?  “Capacity” 28

  29. What’s different . . . or not?  “Capacity” 29

  30. What’s different . . . or not?  “Other” • Market composition • reduced “commercial” presence • specialty companies • non-physician directed • physician directed • Investment income • volatile stock market • interest rates • impact of leverage • Start-ups • how do they play?

More Related