1 / 11

Cumulative task assessment

Cumulative task assessment. Reflection. The concept of our project. The idea is simple but effective The general idea is good and comprehensible The amount of work put in is important All the decision are well thought The concept include ideas from a large amount of people

amish
Télécharger la présentation

Cumulative task assessment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Cumulative task assessment Reflection

  2. The concept of our project • The idea is simple but effective • The general idea is good and comprehensible • The amount of work put in is important • All the decision are well thought • The concept include ideas from a large amount of people • The project had sollicitate the help of professional (Mr Ross)

  3. The organization/planning • The project was plan a long time ahead • The project follow the require structure • All the requirement are present • The blog and information are clearly and neatly display and organized • The general project follow a step by step procedure

  4. The program • The program was debug and fully functional • The program work • The program is neat and organized • The program is simple and effective • The program is comprehensible • Good and explanatory annotation are present

  5. The realisation • The project was done in time. • After few fixes the project work in practise. • The robot achieved is objective • The simplicity of the program was achieve • The size of the program file is of 1kgs • The robot was carefully customized and used • The program match with the wiring of the robot used

  6. Group skills • The group and I were able to adapt to the situation and fixed the problems. • The group used a vast range of skills • The group was able to communicate and comprehend each other ideas to realise the best project. • The group ask a lot of questions when necessary • The group did not mind to ask for support from more qualify individual during their project.

  7. Theory VS Practise • The program did not work from the beginning. • The program needed a few changes • The team needed the help of the teacher to correct and make their program work. • A few range of robot were enable to perform the main objective from the first trial

  8. Too much help • Despite a good work the team might have: • Ask too much questions • Ask too much help • The group might lack of: • Assurance/confidence • Lack of autonomy

  9. Quality of the work • Good quality however: • A lot of grammatical mistake present • Verb misconjugaison

  10. Conclusion One can conclude that the work given by Jose Foppiani was of a general good quality with a good organization and a good team work. The plan establish from the beginning was follow and changed based on the need of the situation. The program and work follow the requirement but might has asked for too much support. A large vast of skills has been used to demonstrate the basic robotic and programing skill understanding. The work of Jose and the member of his team reveal again through this project that theory rarilly work in practise and always need adjustment.

  11. A big thanks to…. • Minjai Lee • Daniel Benda • Mr Ross

More Related