1 / 28

Nutrition

Nutrition. Who. Starvation induced malnutrition Reduced Intake Defective absorption Physiological Stress / Expenditure Burn Malignancy / Surgery Trauma Patient in ICU … CAVH / CAVHD (dialysis) Short term / Long term. Nutritional Status Assessment. No Gold Standard

annot
Télécharger la présentation

Nutrition

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Nutrition

  2. Who • Starvation induced malnutrition • Reduced Intake • Defective absorption • Physiological Stress / Expenditure • Burn • Malignancy / Surgery • Trauma • Patient in ICU… • CAVH / CAVHD (dialysis) • Short term / Long term

  3. Nutritional Status Assessment No Gold Standard History & Examination

  4. Parameters • Weight lost • Subjective / objective • 5-10%, 1 month • 10-20%, 6 months • Weakness • Central muscle wasting • Clothing / Photos • Lost of muscle bulk

  5. Indirect assessment • Anthropometry • Triceps bulk • Skinfold thickness • Midarm muscle circumference • Problems • Inter observer variability • Affected by the patient’s hydration status • Patients own factors (jobs, activities, habits)

  6. Indirect assessment • Creatine-height index • Urinary collection (patient need to have meat-free diets) • Muscle function • Grip strength • Respiratory status • Response to electrical stimulation • Delayed hypersensitivity • Test the immunity respond

  7. ParametersOthers • Albumin • Prealbumin • Immune competence • Delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity • Total lymphocyte count

  8. Biochemical markers • Albumin (T1/2=21days) • Transferrin (T1/2=8days) • Prealbumin (T1/2=2-3days) • Need to consider : • Synthesis rate • Degradation rates • Vascular losses Veterans Affairs Total Parental Nutrition Cooperative Study Group (1991) Perioperative total parental nutrition in surgical patients. N Engl J Med 325, 525-532 Grant,JP. (1986) Nutritional assessment in clinical practice. Nutr Clin Pract 1, 3-11 Fleck,A (1988) Acute phase response: implications for nutrition and recovery. Nutrition 4, 109-117

  9. International Classification of Disease Ninth revision • Recommendations for assessment of malnutrition • Percent weight loss from usual weight, percent IBW (ideal body weight) • Serum albumin level • Inability to eat for ≥7 days Stack JA, Babineau TJ, Bistrian BP (1996) Assessment of nutritional status in clinical practice. Gastroenterologist 4, S8-S15

  10. Prognostic Nutritional Index • PNI(%)=158-16.6(Alb)-0.78(Tsf)-0.20(Tfn)-5.8(Dh) Alb: Albumin (g/dL) Tsf: Triceps folds thickness (mm) Tfn: Serum transferrin (mg/dL) Dh: Delayed hypersensitivity (0-2) none, <5mm, >5mm Surgery, Basic Science and Clinical Evidence, 2000 pp 123-176

  11. Prognostic Inflammatory Nutrition Index PINI=(CRP)(AAG)/(PA)(ALB) CRP: C reactive protein AAG: α1 acid-glycoprotein PA: prealbumin ALB: albumin Surgery, Basic Science and Clinical Evidence, 2000 pp 123-176

  12. Caloric requirements • Harris-Benedict Equation • Male 66+(13.7 x wt.kg) + (5 x ht.cm) – (6.8 x age) • Female 665 + (9.6 x wt.kg) + (1.7 x ht.cm) – (4.7 x age) • Roughly • 22 to 25 Kcal/kg of actual body weight/day

  13. Nutrition Support • Enteral Feeding • Parental Feeding • Total Parental Feeding (TPN) • Partial Parental Feeding

  14. Enteral Feeding • More physiological • Less access complication • Less metabolic complication • Less volume complication • More economical

  15. Enteral Feeding • Prevent intestinal mucosal atrophy • Maintain gut mucosal barrier • Decrease translocation of bacteria from GIT to circulation / peritoneum • Important mechanism for second phase of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SRS) & later multiorgan failure syndrome (MOF) • Retain normal gut flora distribution

  16. Enteral Feeding • Nasogastric tube • Gastrostomy tube • Nasojejunal tube • Jejunostomy tube Bolus feeding Continuous feeding Feeding ideally should bypass or placed distal to the segment of disease / obstruction

  17. Enteral Feeding • Different Formulary • (cost Vs medical need) • Polymeric formula • Osmolite / Jevity • Elemental formula • Contains low molecular weight polypeptide, free fatty acids • Partially digested form for better absorption • Modulate formula • Specially chemically prepared formula • Medium / short chain fatty acids • eg. COAD – less carbohydrate (H-CO load)

  18. Enteral Feeding • Complications: • Diarrhea • Electrolytes / Fluid imbalance • Access complication • Dislodgement • Blockage • Breakage • Aspiration

  19. Parental Nutrition • Venous access • Central • Peripheral • Osmolarity of formula • Most of them hyperosmolar in order to achieve the caloric requirement in relation to volume • thus Central venous access preferred

  20. Parental Nutrition • 3 in 1 solution

  21. Parental Nutrition • Additive • Electrolytes • Na, K, Mg, Ca, PO4 … • Trace elements • Copper, zinc, selenium … • Medications • Insulin … • Vitamin

  22. Daily requirement Anabolism = ingested > excreted protein Catabolism= ingested < excreted protein • Protein • 0.8 – 1.0 gm/kd/day • in stress up to 2.5gm/kg/day • liver encephalopathy limited to 0.8gm/kg/day • Measure the nitrogen balance 24 hour urine • nitrogen (gm) x 6.25 = protein (gm) • protein is 16% nitrogen • Fat • at least 3 – 5 % of calories as fat is needed to prevent essential fatty acid deficiency • Limited to 25-40% total calories • too much… adverse effects on immunity and gas exchange, increase risk of sepsis • monitor serum triglycerides • rate < 0.1 gm/kg/hr • continuous lipid infusion promotes improved triglyceride clearance • 10% lipid = 1.1 kcal/ml • 20% lipid = 2 kcal/ml • CHO • minimum of 100gm/day for brain and RBCs metabolism • stressed patient limited to < 5mg CHO/kg/min

  23. Overfeeding • Increased CO2 production • Increased Lipogenesis / fatty liver • Slower recovery • Energy requirement increased • Specific energy • Impaired immune function

  24. Parental Nutrition • Complications • Access complication • Pneumothorax • Line infection • Deep vein thrombosis • Metabolic disturbance • Refeeding syndrome • Decreased PO4 if started with excess carbohydrate formula in severe malnourished patients • Cholestasis • Hyperglycaemia • Hepatic dysfunction • Sepsis • Fluid / electrolytes imbalance

  25. Refeeding Syndrome • Intracellular movement of potassium, magnesium and phosphorus, as well as sodium and fluid retention associated with administration of glucose in poorly nourished patients • Potentially fatal • At risk groups • Severe malnourished patients with • Chronic alcoholism • Prolonged fasting patients • Prolonged IV hydration without nutrition

  26. Evidence • Enteral Feeding • Long term rehabilitation • Mortality 8% vs 21.7% (Fracture Hip) • Bastow MD, Rawlings J, Allison SP (1983) Benefits of supplementary tube feeding after fractured neck of femur: a randomized controlled trial. BMJ 287, 1589-1592 • Delmi M, Rapin CH, Bengoa JM (1990) Dietary supplementation in elderly patients with fractured neck of the femur. Lancet 335, 1013-1016 • Lower incidence of sepsis (26% vs 4%; P<0.05) • Moore, EE, Jones TN(1986) Benefits of immediate jejunostomy feeding after major abdominal trauma-a prospective, randomized study. J Trauma 26,874-88

  27. Evidence • Parenteral Nutrition • More post operative complications • (? Benefit in severely malnourished group) • Veterans Affairs Total Parenteral Nutrition Cooperative Study Group (1991) Perioperative total parenteral nutrition in surgical patients. N Engl J Med 325, 525-532 • Brennan MF, Pisters PWT, Posner M et al (1994) A prospective randomized trial of total parenteral nutrition after major pancreatic resection for malignancy. Ann Surg 220, 436-444 • 7 days Pre-Operative TPN (HCC) • Morbidity 34%vs 55% P=0.02 • Fan ST, Lo CM, Lai ECS et al (1994) Perioperative nutritional support in patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma, N Engl J Med 331, 1547-1552

More Related