1 / 20

Riga Interim Report 2017: KEY FINDINGS ON THE CANDIDATE COUNTRIES’ PERFORMANCE

This Interim Report provides an overview of the performance of candidate countries in the period 2015-17, highlighting policy developments in vocational education and training (VET). It examines progress in key areas such as apprenticeships, quality assurance, accessibility, and teacher training. The report offers recommendations for moving forward to enhance the quality and accessibility of VET systems.

antoniom
Télécharger la présentation

Riga Interim Report 2017: KEY FINDINGS ON THE CANDIDATE COUNTRIES’ PERFORMANCE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Riga Interim Report 2017: KEY FINDINGS ON THE CANDIDATE COUNTRIES’ PERFORMANCE ACVT/DGVT preparatory meeting Turin, 1 December 2017

  2. Why an Interim Report? • An output agreed under the Monitoring Framework of Riga • Half way to the 2020 horizon of Riga, time to look what has been achieved and what remains to be done • The interim report provides inputs to the discussion on the future of VET

  3. How is the Report structured • The Report has two main parts: • Synthesis Report • Chapter 1 - Policy brief • Chapter 2 - Developments in countries’ VET policies in the period 2015-17 at a glance • Chapter 3 - Countries’ policy developments by MTD • Chapter 4 - EU 28+ and Candidate Countries: common trends and messages for the future • 2. Country chapters • VET Policy development per MTD • Conclusions

  4. MTD prioritisation by the Candidate countries

  5. Addressing Riga mtds: Policy developments in the candidate countries in 2015-17

  6. Total number of actions 2017-15

  7. MTD1: Focus on apprenticeships • Paving the way for introducing formal AP in the Western Balkans • Policy analysis and policy formulation – ex-ante, concepts and strategies (MK, RS), WGs (MK, RS) • Setting the regulatory framework: new legislation adopted (MK, AL) or waiting for adoption (RS, ME) • Measures for implementation – roadmaps, feasibility studies (AL), budget allocations (RS), MoUs (RS), membership in EAfA, pilots and “tasters” • Making existing AP more attractive and accessible, promoting entrepreneurship through AP in Turkey • WBL in school-based VET – “business as usual” with focus on practical training in companies

  8. MTD2: work in progress on qa and tracking mechanisms in vet • EQAVET-compatible national QA approaches devised in 4 CCs, implementation launched • Continuing work on the alignment with EQAVET indicators • National Reference Points appointed: ME, TR, RS • Building tracking systems in VET: AL, MK, ME

  9. MTD3: efforts to make vet and qualifications more accessible, flexible and permeable • Enhancing access and increasing participation in VET • Designing programmes and learning modalities to meet the specific needs of vulnerable groups of learners – ME, MK, TR, AL • Measures addressing dropping-out and early leaving from education and training – RS, MK • Reinforcing counselling services – AL, ME, TR • Making VET systems and pathways permeable, easing transfer of learning within VET and to/from other education and training programmes • Legislation in favour of better permeability – AL, TR • Actions targeting transfer and flexibility of learning – MK, ME • Improving access to qualifications • NQF development • Setting up/improvement of VNFIL as an alternative route to acquire formal qualifications

  10. MTD4: UNDER-REPORTING OR FEW DEVELOPMENTS? • Promotion of key competences through strategic documents (MK), new teacher standards (ME) • Focus on entrepreneurship • Monitoring of key competences remains underdeveloped

  11. MTD5: school teachers in the spotlight • Changing models of initial teacher training in the Western Balkans to address existing gaps – MK, ME, RS • CPD for teachers in VET schools – new approaches and regulations, piloting new modalities • Initial training and CPD of trainers/mentors in companies - a new challenge on the horizon

  12. Types of actions taken in 2017-15, all MTDs

  13. Types of actions 2017-15 per MTD in the candidate countries

  14. Moving forward • Implement the newly developed WBL concepts and legal provisions, increase the scope and enhance the quality of learners’ internships and placements • Strengthen the QA mechanisms and increase the use of EQAVET indicators for quality monitoring; extend and sustain (newly launched) VET tracking mechanisms and apply their results for adapting VET provision • Target measures at groups facing barriers to VET and LM entry, enhance participation in adult learning, while continue with NQF development/ implementation and designing/scaling up of VNFIL arrangements

  15. Moving forward • Strengthen the promotion and monitoring of key competences in VET curricula and through teacher training (with special focus on transversal KCs), provide more effective opportunities to acquire/improve those skills through CVET, reinforce monitoring of the acquisition of key competences • Increase the opportunities for CDP relevant to the vocational specialism of VET teachers/trainers (in-company training!), develop systemic approach to CPD of trainers and mentors in enterprises

  16. conclusions

  17. interim Report: Reflecting on the past – Learning for the Future • No single European VET system • A sense of a single common ambition: to continue upgrading VET as a quality choice for all learners • The five MTDs strike a balance between what is feasible and what is expected the VET systems to focus on • Technological advancement is a challenge and opportunity for VET systems • Political commitment to VET reform is key • Prioritisation often needs consensus among all stakeholders

  18. interim Report: Reflecting on the past – Learning for the Future • Bruges objectives – A heritage for Riga • No starting point but rather a point of transition • Prioritisation is a tough job! • There are urgent needs/priorities outside Riga i.e. inclusion of refugee learners • Not always easy to report and monitor achievements • Not all achievements are captured in monitoring and reporting • Systematic discussion of Riga in ACVT/DGVT committees helps • Spill over effect of Riga into the discussion on the Future of VET

  19. Thankyou for your attention

More Related