1 / 10

Current Challenge

Service Task Force Final Report President’s Emerging Leaders Electronic Communications with Students Team (PEL ECS). Current Challenge. Determine the extent of the perceived problem of students not reading emails sent by the University

Télécharger la présentation

Current Challenge

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Service Task Force Final ReportPresident’s Emerging LeadersElectronic Communications with Students Team (PEL ECS)

  2. Current Challenge • Determine the extent of the perceived problem of students not reading emails sent by the University • Examine the potential of developing the University’s portal(s) as either a secondary or possible primary mode of communication with students

  3. Interviews • Perception that students do not read or act upon critical emails from the University • Perception that portal strategy duplicates One Stop online • Great deal of effort to solidify student portal strategy

  4. Surveys • Pilot survey, 37 students • Formal survey, 100 students • 35 Freshman • 20 Sophomore • 20 Junior • 15 Senior • 7 Graduate Students • 42 majors

  5. Survey Results • 70% described their University email account as their primary email account • 90% access their University email account every day • 70% receive “just the right amount” of email from the University, 24% receive “too many” emails • Nearly 80% delete some University emails without reading them • 58% delete emails because the subject line is irrelevant to them • 37% delete messages they believe to be impersonal or broadcast • 14% hit delete because they don’t recognize the sender name/address

  6. Email Usage Data • Between May 1 and May 3, 2006 • 37,094 students accessed their University email account (approx. 77%) • Only 14% forward their University email

  7. Literature Searches • University email policy better defined than most other schools • University would be best served creating their own effective writing best practices for email • Portal best practice documents cited in report, Portal Development for Undergraduate Students at the University of Minnesota Twin Cities: Fostering Capacity and Assuring Sustainability

  8. Technology Changing Across Campus • Difficult to formulate recommendations on a moving target • Webmail was updated not once, but twice during the course of our report • University Counseling and Consulting Services announced a Podcast that offered students tips on avoiding procrastination and managing stress • University Libraries offers UThink, the largest academically affiliated weblog service in North America, and hosts 2,523 blogs • Academic and Distributed Computing Services (ADCS) has developed the “University of Minnesota’s Community wiki” with 69 wikis to date • Strategic implementation of enterprise-wide technology initiatives will ensure cost savings and eliminate duplicated efforts

  9. Recommendations • Students rely on email to receive information, but may delete what they perceive to be irrelevant or too long and may perceive they receive too many messages • Reassert current University policy for communicating with students • Develop and communicate tips to assist members of the University community with creating email messages that are more likely to be read and acted upon by students • Create and enforce one way for University community members to obtain addresses and permission for group or mass emails

  10. Recommendations • Technology implementations can be done at the department or college level, therefore, it is difficult to know what is available • Create and maintain an enterprise-wide communications matrix of available technologies • Create a department for communication technology development and implementation • Integrate existing technologies as much as possible to avoid the need to duplicate messages • Use the University report Portal Development for Undergraduate Students at the University of Minnesota Twin Cities: Fostering Capacity and Assuring Sustainability as the basis for further portal development

More Related