1 / 15

Budget Discussion

Budget Discussion. Board Briefing 2009-2010 Adopted Budget. 2% Scenario Adopted Budget. 2% Cuts. (1) Includes $457,000 for Research positions. 2009-10 FTES Targets. We are projecting being funded up to only 19,100 FTES for 2009-10.

arvid
Télécharger la présentation

Budget Discussion

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Budget Discussion Board Briefing 2009-2010 Adopted Budget

  2. 2% Scenario Adopted Budget

  3. 2% Cuts (1) Includes $457,000 for Research positions.

  4. 2009-10 FTES Targets • We are projecting being funded up to only 19,100 FTES for 2009-10. • Our 2008-09 FTES was 20,300 resident FTES, we were funded for 19,800. • That is a reduction of 1,200 FTES over what we served in 2008-09

  5. 2009-10 FTES Targets TABLE 1

  6. 2008-2009 Fall Comparisons

  7. FTES • College Productivity Targets have been set at:

  8. Productivity – How does it add up?

  9. Glossary of Terms • FTES: Full-Time Equivalent Student TheDistrict receives about $4,600 for each FTES • FTEF: Full-Time Equivalent Faculty A load of 100% taught by one instructor (full-time) or several instructors (part-time). Part-time faculty may not exceed 60% of a full-time load (now 67% in January 2009) • Productivity The efficiency with which we use our resources. It is figured by dividing the semester WSCH by the semester FTEF. Because FTEF is also an annualized term, productivity can also be figured by dividing the WSCH by 2 times the Load Factor. District target for a productivity of 525 which is the same as 17.5 FTES/FTEF for 07-08. 17.5x30 = 525. Each decrease of 10 WSCH/FTEF in district wide productivity equates to about $500,000 in additional costs. So if a as a district we decrease from 17.5 FTES/FTEF to 16.5 FTES/FTEF that is the same as 30 point drop or $1,500,000 in additional costs.

  10. Examples of Different FTES/FTEF Targets • District Wide – 17.5 FTES/FTEF Budgeted • 17 FTES/FTEF $750,000 additional costs (more 1351 money needs to be spend) • 16.5 FTES/FTEF as a district $1,500,000 in additional costs. • 16 FTES/FTEF $2,250,000 additional costs

  11. Per Campus as of Fall 2007 • If: • Alameda is 18% of district enrollment • Berkeley in 18% • Laney is 43% and • Merritt is 21% • Then for each 1 point decrease of FTEF/FTES the additional cost or savings per college is the percentage of $1,500,000 • Alameda $270,000 • Berkeley $270,000 • Laney $645,000 • Merritt $315,000 So when Merritt operates at 14.5 vs. 17.5 it cost $1 million more to produce the same FTES at Berkeley

  12. Questions?

More Related