1 / 24

Using an Efficient Frontier Analysis Approach to Improve ERM Implementation

Using an Efficient Frontier Analysis Approach to Improve ERM Implementation. Prepared by: Ward Ching, Vice President, Risk Management Operations, Safeway, Inc. Loren Nickel, FCAS, CFA, MAAA, Regional Director and Actuary, Aon Global Risk Consulting RIMS Session ERM009.

azura
Télécharger la présentation

Using an Efficient Frontier Analysis Approach to Improve ERM Implementation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Using an Efficient Frontier Analysis Approach to Improve ERM Implementation Prepared by: Ward Ching, Vice President, Risk Management Operations, Safeway, Inc. Loren Nickel, FCAS, CFA, MAAA, Regional Director and Actuary, Aon Global Risk Consulting RIMS Session ERM009

  2. Before we get started… • This is a technical discussion of the use of EFA techniques as applied to hazard risks within an hypothetical organization. • Yes, there will be some math. The obligatory equation and assumption set is gratuitously included for your reading and napping enjoyment. • Yes, there will be a number of graphs that have reasonably squiggly lines in them. • If we feel like it, there may be a quiz at the end of the session, just to see if you were awake. Cheating may be necessary. Start taking notes now, just in case. • If your head hurts, even slightly, we’ve done our jobs.

  3. Anyone who wants to leave, now is the time to do it… You are now well and truly warned...

  4. We won’t point fingers at you (well maybe) or snicker too loudly…

  5. Your dignity is our main concern…well, sort of.

  6. Over the past 25 years, advanced quantitative financial and behavioral analysis has received much attention • Need to better understand and predict performance impact of hazard risk as a financial portfolio • Limitations of single discipline modeling often lead to misreading or under valuation of complex business risks across operational categories. • Need to answer broader risk related questions (insurance, finance, audit and operations) to seek out a more integrated and data robust approach. • Questions regarding the dynamic impact of enterprise-wide risk portfolios has given rise to robust Enterprise or Strategic Risk Management techniques.

  7. The RIMS Strategic Risk Management Framework

  8. Framework highlights… • The focus of the Framework is on the impact of risk on strategies • How do differing risk profiles create economic or operational tradeoffs? • How do the tradeoffs impact risk transfer or risk assumption decisions? • Are all risk assumption decisions the same? • How do risk tolerances change as an entity’s strategy changes? • Do the “analytically informed” risk adjusted strategies yield competitive or exploitable opportunities?

  9. Modern Portfolio Theory is the analytical foundation that underpins Efficient Frontier Analysis • MPT is a mathematical method developed in the mid-1950s. • Theory of Finance focused on the maximization of portfolio return while minimizing risk subject to an expected predetermined financial return. • MPT simulates the impact of various “risk adjusted” strategies against fixed targeted returns. • The objective of MPT is to understand the sources of volatility across a defined portfolio or mix of assets. • MPT models generally assume normal distribution functions and views risk as the standard deviation of return.

  10. Types of questions asked • What is the economic value of an organization’s material risk profile when characterized as a financial portfolio? • How can the economic or operational volatility of an organization’s risk profile be examined dynamically and intertemporally? • Are an organization’s risk mitigation strategies and methods efficiently matching its risk profile? • If an organization changes its operationsin a material way, what impact can be visualized across the organization's risk portfolio? • If risk retention and risk transfer are considered two independent variables in an organization's’ risk profile distribution, how can the two be maximized through insurance purchase? • Other Techniques Used: Dynamic Financial Analysis, Capital Asset Pricing Modeling, Behavioral Economics.

  11. What is Efficient Frontier Analysis? • EFA is a quantitative technique that allows for the graphical depiction of an organization's’ portfolio of risk. • In many cases EFA is performed in conjunction with higher order simulation methods such as the Monte Carlo application in insurance. • EFA focuses on understanding the trade offs between risk assumption and risk transfer given an optimal risk portfolio.

  12. EFA Questions • What is the shape, size and volatility of an organization’s risk frontier? • What drives changes in the shape of an organization’s risk frontier? • Do the risk mitigation methods being used by the organization to manage/assume/transfer risk correspond to the risk frontier? • Are there instances where the risk mitigation methods are inefficient relative to the risk frontier (i.e., under defend volatile or difficult risks and over defend trivial risks?) • Can the use of EFA influence insurance-related retention efficiency or layering decisions? • Can the use of EFA suggest different or integrated approaches to financially engineering risk across hazard, market, operational, or reputational risk spaces?

  13. Benefits to Risk Management The four benefits to risk management as defined by James Lam  are: • Managing risk is management’s job • Managing risk can reduce earnings volatility • Managing risk can maximize shareholder value • Risk management promotes job and financial security

  14. Financial Efficient Frontier Formulas Transformed into Insurance Framework Standard Expected Loss Formula: E(rc) = rf + y[E(rp) – rf] We will replace E(rc) with E(rsp) E(rsp) = expected risk spend; which is expected retained loss + premium paid to transfer risk Standard Risk Formula: σ2p=wA2σA2+ wB2σB2+2wAwBσAσBρAB We will replace σ2p with TVAR95 TVAR95= Tail Value at Risk and is the average of the 5% of the worst outcomes in a simulation for the portfolio of risk

  15. Efficient Frontier Framework Portfolio Preference

  16. Sample Case Study – Current Program We have a sample insurance program which includes three lines of coverage: Earthquake, Workers’ Compensation and General Liability. The following table shows the retention and limits purchased, along with the current expected losses retained by line and for the portfolio.

  17. Sample Case Study – Mathematical Options • Using the mathematical method, we select options that are mathematically close to the current program and then extend outward. • Under the mathematical method, there is no recognition of marketplace dynamics; it is purely a linear selection of options. • The availability approach (not shown here) selects options that are known to be available in the marketplace, and may not be linear.

  18. Sample Case Study – Simulated Losses

  19. Sample Case Study – Efficient Frontier

  20. Sample Case Study - Findings • The portfolios no longer follow the efficient frontier, as some of the options lie above the efficient frontier line. • The slope of the efficient frontier is steep, and follows the risks that contribute to the portfolio (earthquake in this instance is driving the steep curve) • If the organization is using a risk appetite for the entire portfolio, then they would look at the efficient frontier below the $20 million dollar Tail Value at Risk level. (Only option #4 qualifies)

  21. Several Modern Portfolio Concerns Contained in the Framework • Asset returns are (jointly) normally distributed random variables • Addressed by using TVAR and non-normal assumptions • Correlations between assets are fixed and constant forever • Addressed by using copulas and/or correlation matrix • All investors have access to the same information at the same time • Insurance markets clearly have this concern, where anyone with more information can be at an advantage • All securities can be divided into parcels of any size • Still a concern, as insurance products are not fractional. However, more information may lead to a product that is better than current offerings. • Risk/volatility of an asset is known in advance/is constant • Addressed by using simulations allowing for parameter risk in addition to process risk

  22. Behavioral Concerns of Efficient Frontier The different types of informational errors are: • Forecasting errors • Over-relying on recent experience • Overconfidence • Are you ‘lucky’ or ‘good’? • Conservatism • Slow to react to new information • Sample size neglect and representativeness • Using too small a sample size for forecasting

  23. Takeaways • Businesses will begin to focus on insurance risk in a portfolio • Our new framework is robust, and appropriate for today’s computing power and ‘big data’ storage • Experience is an important criteria for any framework, i.e. knowing when it is appropriate and when it is not

  24. Ok…you can leave now…

More Related